Service flow scheduling method and apparatus, and system
US-2023336486-A1 · Oct 19, 2023 · US
US2025292264A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2025292264-A1 |
| Application number | US-202418602988-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Mar 12, 2024 |
| Priority date | Mar 12, 2024 |
| Publication date | Sep 18, 2025 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
An information handling system generates a data tolerance policy with a data tolerance value for a data type. If a data collection request meets a set of criteria that includes whether a number of active data collection policies exceeds a threshold, then the system modifies the data tolerance value of the data type in the data tolerance policy. The system instruments data according to a modified data tolerance value, the data collection request, and the data tolerance policy.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A method comprising: generating, by a processor, a data tolerance policy with a data tolerance value for a data type; if a data instrumentation request meets a set of criteria that includes whether a number of active data collection policies exceeds a threshold, then modifying the data tolerance value of the data type in the data tolerance policy; collecting data according to a modified data tolerance value, the data instrumentation request, and the data tolerance policy; and transmitting the data in a response to the data instrumentation request. 2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising validating a service level agreement associated with the data instrumentation request. 3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the collecting of the data is performed subsequent to the validating of the service level agreement. 4 . The method of claim 2 , further comprising notifying an application that transmitted the data instrumentation request when the service level agreement passes validation. 5 . The method of claim 2 , further comprising returning an error message when the service level agreement fails validation. 6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of criteria includes system power status of an information handling system. 7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of criteria includes current system load of an information handling system. 8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of criteria includes whether a user is detected. 9 . An information handling system, comprising: a memory to store a data expiration policy; and a processor to communicate with the memory, the processor to: generate a data tolerance policy with a data tolerance value for a data type; if a data collection request meets a set of criteria that includes whether a number of active data collection policies exceeds a threshold, then modify the data tolerance value of the data type in the data tolerance policy; instrument data according to a modified data tolerance value, the data collection request, and the data tolerance policy; and transmit the data in a response to the data collection request. 10 . The information handling system of claim 9 , wherein the processor is further configured to validate a service level agreement associated with the data collection request. 11 . The information handling system of claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to to instrument the data subsequent to a successful validation of the service level agreement. 12 . The information handling system of claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to notify an application that transmitted the data collection request when the service level agreement is successfully validated. 13 . The information handling system of claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to return an error message when the service level agreement fails validation. 14 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium to store instructions that are executable to perform operations comprising: receiving a first request to collect a first data type for a first duration and a second request to collect a second data type for a second duration; if there is a duration that overlaps between the first duration and the second duration, then modifying a data tolerance value of a third data type; generating a policy that includes a modified data tolerance value of the third data type during the duration that overlaps instead of the data tolerance value; instrumenting a first data value of the first data type, a second data value of the second data type, and a third data value of the third data type according to the policy; and transmitting a first response that includes the first data value and a second response that includes the second data value. 15 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the first request is from a first application and the second request is from a second application. 16 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the operations further comprise subsequent to the duration that overlaps between the first duration and the second duration, reverting the modified data tolerance value of the third data type to the data tolerance value. 17 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the operations further comprise validating a service level agreement associated with the first request. 18 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the instrumenting of the first data value is performed subsequent to a successful validation of the service level agreement. 19 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the operations further comprise returning an error to an application that transmitted the first request when the service level agreement fails validation. 20 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the data tolerance value of the third data type is in a data tolerance policy.
Certifying business or products · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.