Vehicle operator awareness system
US-12269494-B2 · Apr 8, 2025 · US
US2025259203A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2025259203-A1 |
| Application number | US-202418441045-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Feb 14, 2024 |
| Priority date | Feb 14, 2024 |
| Publication date | Aug 14, 2025 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method and system of promoting operator focus through systematic positive reinforcement. The method includes receiving sensor data containing operator features; analyzing the operator features to determine the operator is in an alert state; determining a duration of alert time the operator remains in the alert state; and issuing a first level positive reinforcement feedback (1L PRF) in response to the operator remaining in the alert state equal to a sustained attention threshold (AThreshold). The method further includes issuing a second level positive reinforcement feedback (2L PRF) when the number of 1L PFR issued is equal to a first predetermined first value (K1). The method further includes issuing a third level positive reinforcement feedback (3L PRF) when the number of 2L PFR issued is equal to a second predetermined calibration value (K2).
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A method of promoting operator focus through systematic positive reinforcement, comprising: a. analyzing sensor data to determine an operator is in an alert state; b. determining a length of alert time the operator remains in the alert state; C. determining the length of alert time is greater than a predetermine Attention Threshold (AThreshold); and d. issuing a first level positive reinforcement feedback (1L PRF) in response to the length of alert time is greater than the predetermine Attention Threshold (AThreshold). 2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: repeating steps (a) through (d); determining a number of consecutive 1L PRF issued; and issuing a second level positive reinforcement feedback (2L PRF) when the number of consecutive 1L PFR issued is equal to a first predetermined calibration value (K1). 3 . The method of claim 2 , further comprising: determining a number of consecutive 2L PRF issued; and issuing a third level positive reinforcement feedback (3L PRF) when the number of consecutive 2L PFR issued is equal to a second predetermined calibration value (K2). 4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein: the 1L PRF comprises an audible chime; the 2L PRF comprises an audible cheer; and the 3L PRF comprises at least one of a personalized message and an accumulable point redeemable for a service or item of monetary value. 5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the 3L PRF is based on a predetermined focus score (FS), wherein: FS =( TT−ADT )/ TT , wherein: TT=Total Travel Time ADT=Accumulated Distraction time. 6 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the 1L PRF and the 2L PRF are implemented by an infotainment unit of a vehicle. 7 . The method of claim 3 , further comprising: analyzing sensor data to determine a distraction event (DE); determining a distraction duration (DD) of the DE; determining the DD is greater than a predetermine distraction threshold (DT); and resetting the number of consecutive 1L PRF issued to zero in response to the DD is greater than the DT. 8 . The method of claim 3 , wherein analyzing sensor data to determine an operator is in an alert state, comprises: analyzing sensor data to determine whether the operator is exhibiting a predetermined distracted behavior; determining a distracted time duration the operator is exhibiting the predetermine distracted behavior; and determining the operator is in an alert state in response to one of: the operator is determined to not exhibit the predetermined distracted behavior, and the distracted time duration is less than a predetermined distraction threshold (DT). 9 . The method of claim 3 , further comprising: issuing at least one of the 1L PRF, the 2L PRF, and the 3L PRF in response to the 1L PFR being equal to a random value greater than the first predetermined calibration value (K1). 10 . The method of claim 3 , wherein at least one of: the first level positive reinforcement feedback (1L PRF) is issued on an aleatory basis; and the second level positive reinforcement feedback (2L PRF) is issued on the aleatory basis. 11 . A system for promoting operator focus through systematic positive reinforcement, comprising: at least one sensor configured to gather information on an operator of a vehicle; and a control module configured to: analyze the gathered information to determine the operator is in an alert state, determine a duration of alert time the operator remains in the alert state, and issue a first level positive reinforcement feedback (1L PRF) in response to the duration of alert time is equal to a predetermined sustained attention threshold (AThreshold). 12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the control module is further configured to: determine a number of consecutive 1L PRF issued; and issue a second level positive reinforcement feedback (2L PRF) when the number of consecutive 1L PFR issued is equal to a first predetermined first value (K1). 13 . The system of claim 12 , further comprising: an infotainment unit in communication with the control module, wherein the infotainment unit is configured to issue the 1L PRF in a form of a chime and issue the 2L PRF in a form of a cheer. 14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the control module is further configured to: determine a number of consecutive 2L PRF issued; and issue a third level positive reinforcement feedback (3L PRF) when the number of consecutive 2L PFR issued is equal to a second predetermined calibration value (K2). 15 . The system of claim 14 , further comprising: a reward system configured to issue the 3L PRF in a form of reward points redeemable for a service or an item of monetary value. 16 . A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising instructions stored thereon for promoting operator focus through systematic positive reinforcement, that upon execution by a processor, cause the processor to: receive sensor data containing operator features; analyze the operator features to determine an operator is in an alert state; determine a duration of alert time the operator remains in the alert state; and issue a first level positive reinforcement feedback (1L PRF) in response to the duration of time is equal to a predetermine sustained attention threshold (AThreshold). 17 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 16 , further comprising instructions to cause the processor to: determine a number of consecutive 1L PRF issued; and issue a second level positive reinforcement feedback (2L PRF) when the number of consecutive 1L PRF issued is equal to a first predetermined first value (K1). 18 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 17 , further comprising instructions to cause the processor to: determine a number of consecutive 2L PRF issued; and issue a third level positive reinforcement feedback (3L PRF) when the number of consecutive 2L PFR issued is equal to a second predetermined calibration value (K2). 19 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 18 , further comprising instructions to cause the processor to: issue at least one of the 1L PRF and the 2L PRF on an aleatory basis. 20 . The computer readable medium of claim 18 , further comprising instructions to cause the processor to: issue the 3L PRF as an accumulable reward point redeemable for a service or item of monetary value.
indicating a condition of sleep, e.g. anti-dozing alarms · CPC title
constrained by time limit or expiration date · CPC title
detecting deviation from an expected pattern of behaviour or schedule · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.