Providing Emulated Access to a Remotely Managed Storage System

US2024214278A1 · US · A1

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-2024214278-A1
Application numberUS-202318502175-A
CountryUS
Kind codeA1
Filing dateNov 6, 2023
Priority dateOct 2, 2014
Publication dateJun 27, 2024
Grant date

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Systems, methods, and computer readable storage mediums for emulating a local interface to a remotely managed storage system, including: receiving a request for remote access a storage system, wherein access is provided using a user interface (‘UI’); identifying, for a user profile, a version of the UI that is utilized when locally accessing the storage system; and presenting, a remote UI for the storage system, wherein a version of the remote UI matches the version of the UI that is utilized when the user locally accesses the storage system, wherein the remote UI provides read-only access to the storage system.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

21 . A system comprising: a cloud-based system that includes a non-transitory computer readable medium and a computer processor, wherein the non-transitory computer readable medium includes computer program instructions that when executed by the computer processor cause the cloud-based system to carry out the steps of: generating, using historical status information associated with one or more storage systems, responses to requests directed to a storage system of the one or more storage systems as if the cloud-based system was the storage system; and presenting, for the storage system, a remote UI that matches a locally utilized UI for the storage system, wherein the remote UI provides read-only access to the storage system and presents a historical view of the storage system using the generated responses. 22 . The system of claim 21 , wherein the non-transitory computer readable medium further includes computer program instructions that when executed by the computer processor cause the cloud-based system to carry out the steps of receiving a request for remote access to a storage system of the one or more storage systems; and identifying, for a user profile, the locally utilized version of the UI that is utilized when locally accessing the storage system. 23 . The system of claim 21 wherein the one or more storage systems are configured to generate a local GUI presenting a view of the status of the one or more storage systems, and wherein an appearance of the remote UI is substantially similar to an appearance of the local GUI. 24 . The system of claim 23 wherein the non-transitory computer readable medium further includes computer program instructions that when executed by the computer processor cause the cloud-based system to carry out the step of generating, by the cloud-based system, the remote UI to match the local GUI. 25 . The system of claim 21 wherein a user is unable to make changes to the one or more storage systems using the remote UI. 26 . The system of claim 21 wherein the historical status information includes at least one of volume count, queue depth, read bandwidth, read input/output operations per second (IOPS), read latency, write bandwidth, write IOPS, and write latency. 27 . The system of claim 21 wherein the cloud-based system is further configured to generate the remote UI when the one or more storage systems is offline. 28 . A method comprising: generating, by a cloud-based system, using historical status information associated with one or more storage systems, responses to requests directed to a storage system of the one or more storage systems as if the cloud-based system was the storage system; and presenting, for the storage system, a remote UI that matches a locally utilized UI for the storage system, wherein the remote UI provides read-only access to the storage system and presents a historical view of the storage system using the generated responses. 29 . The method of claim 28 , further comprising: receiving a request for remote access to a storage system of the one or more storage systems; and identifying, for a user profile, the locally utilized version of the UI that is utilized when locally accessing the storage system. 30 . The method of claim 28 wherein the one or more storage systems are configured to generate a local GUI presenting a view of the status of the one or more storage systems, and wherein an appearance of the remote UI is substantially similar to an appearance of the local GUI. 31 . The method of claim 30 further comprising generating, by the cloud-based system, the remote UI to match the local GUI. 32 . The method of claim 28 wherein a user is unable to make changes to the one or more storage systems using the remote UI. 33 . The method of claim 28 wherein the historical status information includes at least one of volume count, queue depth, read bandwidth, read input/output operations per second (IOPS), read latency, write bandwidth, write IOPS, and write latency. 34 . The method of claim 28 wherein the cloud-based system is further configured to generate the remote UI when the one or more storage systems is offline. 35 . A non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing program instructions, wherein the program instructions are executable by a processor of a cloud-based storage system to carry out the steps of: generating, by a cloud-based system, using historical status information associated with one or more storage systems, responses to requests directed to a storage system of the one or more storage systems as if the cloud-based system was the storage system; and presenting, for the storage system, a remote UI that matches a locally utilized UI for the storage system, wherein the remote UI provides read-only access to the storage system and presents a historical view of the storage system using the generated responses. 36 . The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 35 further comprising program instructions to carry out the step of: receiving a request for remote access to a storage system of the one or more storage systems; and identifying, for a user profile, the locally utilized version of the UI that is utilized when locally accessing the storage system. 37 . The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 35 wherein the one or more storage systems are configured to generate a local GUI presenting a view of the status of the one or more storage systems, and wherein an appearance of the remote UI is substantially similar to an appearance of the local GUI. 38 . The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 37 further comprising program instructions to carry out the step of generating, by the cloud-based system, the remote UI to match the local GUI. 39 . The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 35 wherein a user is unable to make changes to the one or more storage systems using the remote UI. 40 . The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 35 wherein the historical status information includes at least one of volume count, queue depth, read bandwidth, read input/output operations per second (IOPS), read latency, write bandwidth, write IOPS, and write latency.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • for distributed storage of data in networks, e.g. transport arrangements for network file system [NFS], storage area networks [SAN] or network attached storage [NAS] · CPC title

  • for the control of specific functions or operations, e.g. selecting or manipulating an object, an image or a displayed text element, setting a parameter value or selecting a range · CPC title

  • where the computing system component is a storage system, e.g. DASD based or network based (digital input from or digital output to record carriers G06F3/06; digital recording or reproducing G11B20/18; for distributed storage of data in networks, e.g. transport arrangements for network file system [NFS], storage area networks [SAN] or network attached storage [NAS], H04L67/1097) · CPC title

  • Data logging (G06F11/14, G06F11/2205 take precedence) · CPC title

  • for performance assessment · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US2024214278A1 cover?
Systems, methods, and computer readable storage mediums for emulating a local interface to a remotely managed storage system, including: receiving a request for remote access a storage system, wherein access is provided using a user interface (‘UI’); identifying, for a user profile, a version of the UI that is utilized when locally accessing the storage system; and presenting, a remote UI for t…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Pure Storage Inc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06F11/3476. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Thu Jun 27 2024 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (A1). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 2 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).