Colored organic peroxide compositions
US-10358559-B2 · Jul 23, 2019 · US
US2023243805A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2023243805-A1 |
| Application number | US-202118024218-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Sep 22, 2021 |
| Priority date | Sep 22, 2020 |
| Publication date | Aug 3, 2023 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Inks for direct food contact with wide colour gamut and good physical resistance properties, and methods for identifying such inks, for printing such inks, and for packaging foodstuffs with materials printed with such inks.
Opening claim text (preview).
1 - 39 . (canceled) 40 . A method of providing or identifying one or more ink or coating composition(s) suitable for food contact, said method comprising the steps of: (i) providing one or more colourant(s); (ii) identifying the substances and any impurities in said colourant(s), wherein said identification comprises subjecting said colourant(s) to an extraction test; (iii) establishing a specific migration limit (SML) for each of the substances identified in step (ii); (iv) formulating said one or more colourant(s) into said ink or coating composition, and calculating the proportion of each of the substances identified in step (ii) which is present in a finished printed layer derived from said ink or coating composition; (v) performing a worst-case calculation by assuming that 100% of each of the substances identified in step (ii) migrates to a foodstuff when contacted with a finished printed layer derived from said ink or coating composition; (vi) evaluating whether said worst-case calculation in step (v) for each of the substances identified in step (ii) satisfies the criterion of being equal to or greater than the specific migration limit (SML) from step (iii), and if said criterion is satisfied for any of said substances then subjecting said ink or coating composition to migration testing; (vii) empirically determining by chemical analysis the migration level (M L ) of each of said substances identified in step (ii) in one or more migration test(s); (viii) evaluating whether the migration level (M L ) measured empirically in step (vii) for each of said substances in said ink or coating composition satisfies the criterion of being less than the specific migration limit (SML) established for that substance in step (iii), (ix) selecting as an ink or coating composition suitable for food contact those ink or coating composition(s) for which every substance contained therein satisfies the criterion in step (viii); (x) optionally selecting those ink or coating composition(s) containing one or more substance(s) which fail the criterion in step (viii) to be an ink or coating composition suitable for food contact only in restricted quantities. 41 . A method according to claim 40 which is a method for identifying a plurality of ink or coating compositions suitable for food contact wherein said plurality of ink or coating compositions constitute a set. 42 . A method according to claim 40 wherein said colourant is a commercially available product having one or more impurities declared by the manufacturer thereof. 43 . A method according to claim 40 wherein one or more of the specific migration limit(s) in step (iii) is stipulated by regional regulations for food contact, preferably selected from one or more of: the EU Plastics Regulation No. 10/2011; Swiss Ordinance on Materials and Articles 817.023.21 of the Food Safety and Veterinary Office of the Swiss Federal Department of Home Affairs; and US FDA Regulation 178.3297; and Chinese Regulation GB 9685-2008 and its subsequent updates. 44 . A method according to claim 40 wherein one or more of the specific migration limit(s) in step (iii) is established by a hazard assessment using the Threshold of Toxicological Concern approach developed by the EFSA, or the EFSA and WHO. 45 . A method according to claim 44 wherein the hazard assessment comprises establishing if the substance identified in step (ii) is genotoxic using VEGA QSAR (version 1.1.5) prediction models. 46 . A method according to claim 40 wherein said specific migration limit(s) in step (iii) is established with reference to the standard EU Cube (10 cm 3 ) exposure model. 47 . A method according to claim 40 wherein said worst-case calculation in step (v) is performed on the basis of one or more food contact exposure models, preferably selected from the standard EU Cube (10 cm 3 ) exposure model, a yoghurt pot lid exposure model, a cheese packaging cylinder exposure model, and a coffee capsule frusto-conical exposure model. 48 . A method according to claim 40 wherein said migration test in step (vii) comprises subjecting the ink or coating composition to one or more, and preferably all, of a food simulant test selected from (a) the 10% ethanol test at 20° C., (b) the 50% ethanol test at 20° C., (c) the hot fill boiled water test and (d) the 3% acetic acid test at 20° C.; and preferably wherein a plurality of migration tests selected from tests (a) to (d) are conducted in which case the migration level (M L ) is defined as the highest migration level measured in any of said plurality of migration tests. 49 . A method according to claim 40 further comprises the following steps subsequent to step (ix) and, where present, subsequent to step (x): (xi) defining a food contact packaging surface onto which said ink composition(s) are to be disposed and calculating the area A P-MAX of said surface which corresponds to 100% coverage of said surface with said ink or coating composition(s); (xii) defining an area A M which is the surface area of food contact in the exposure model on the basis of which said specific migration limits (SML) have been established in step (iii); (xiii) calculating an adjusted migration level (M L-A ) which is specific to the food contact packaging surface defined in step (xi) wherein M L-A =M L ×A P-MAX /A M ; (xiv) selecting one or more ink or coating composition(s) suitable for unrestricted use on said food contact packaging surface if the M L-A values of all substances in said composition(s) is less than said SML(s); and (xv) optionally selecting one or more ink or coating composition(s) suitable for restricted use on said food contact packaging surface if the M L-A value of any substance in said composition(s) is equal to or greater than said SML(s), wherein said restricted use is defined by a coverage factor C F , wherein C F =(100/M L-A )×100, wherein said coverage factor C F is the maximum fraction of said food contact packaging surface area which can be covered by said one or more ink or coating composition(s) suitable for restricted use. 50 . A method according to claim 40 wherein said the ink or coating composition further comprises one or more diluents and/or one or more additives additional to said colourant(s), and wherein said method comprises the steps of: (i) providing one or more colourant(s), one or more additive(s) and one or more diluent(s); (ii) identifying the substances and any impurities in said colourant(s), additive(s) and diluent(s); (iii) establishing a specific migration limit (SML) for each of the substances identified in step (ii); (iv) formulating said one or more colourant(s) additive(s) and diluent(s) into said ink or coating composition, and calculating the proportion of each of the substances identified in step (ii) which is present in a finished printed layer derived from said ink or coating composition; (v) performing a worst-case calculation by assuming that 100% of each of the substances identified in step (ii) migrates to a foodstuff when contacted with a finished printed layer derived from said ink or coating composition; (vi) evaluating whether said worst-case calculation in step (v) for each of the substances identified in step (ii) satisfies the criterion of being equal to or greater than the specific migration limit (SML) from step (iii), and if said criterion is satisfied for any of said substances then subjecting said ink or coating composition to migration testing; (vii) empirically determining by chemical analysis the migration level (M L ) of each of said substances identified in step (ii) in one or more migration test(s); (viii) evaluating whether the migration level (M L
Paints; Inks · CPC title
based on non-aqueous solvents · CPC title
Addition of dyes or pigments, e.g. in combination with optical brighteners · CPC title
Pigment inks · CPC title
Ink-sets specially adapted for multi-colour inkjet printing · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.