Systems and method for action recognition using micro-doppler signatures and recurrent neural networks
US-2020160046-A1 · May 21, 2020 · US
US2023222385A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2023222385-A1 |
| Application number | US-202318174973-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Feb 27, 2023 |
| Priority date | Oct 8, 2020 |
| Publication date | Jul 13, 2023 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
An evaluation method executed by a computer, the evaluation method comprising processing of: generating, based on information that indicates a degree of reduction of inference accuracy of a machine learning model to a change in first training data, second training data that reduces the inference accuracy; training the machine learning model by using the second training data; and evaluating the trained machine learning model.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . An evaluation method executed by a computer, the evaluation method comprising processing of: generating, based on information that indicates a degree of reduction of inference accuracy of a machine learning model to a change in first training data, second training data that reduces the inference accuracy; training the machine learning model by using the second training data; and evaluating the trained machine learning model. 2 . The evaluation method according to claim 1 , wherein the generating of the second training data includes: randomly selecting data as an initial point from clusters of all labels of the first training data; adding, to the initial point, data obtained by assigning one or a plurality of labels different from an original label to each piece of the selected data; adding, to the initial point, data obtained by pairing data with different labels with each other; and generating the second training data based on the initial point. 3 . The evaluation method according to claim 2 , wherein the generating of the second training data includes generating a plurality of pieces of the second training data based on a plurality of the initial points, the training of the machine learning model includes training the machine learning model by using each piece of the plurality of second training data, and the evaluating of the trained machine learning model includes evaluating each of a plurality of the trained machine learning models trained by using each piece of the plurality of second training data. 4 . The evaluation method according to claim 2 , wherein the generating of the second training data based on the initial point includes: updating the initial point by a gradient ascent method; and generating the second training data based on the updated initial point. 5 . The evaluation method according to claim 4 , wherein the generating of the second training data based on the initial point includes: updating a label assigned to the initial point by the gradient ascent method; and generating the second training data based on the updated initial point and label. 6 . The evaluation method according to claim 1 , wherein the evaluating of the trained machine learning model includes: calculating, by using a function that calculates a change amount of a loss function, a first accuracy difference of the inference accuracy between the machine learning model trained by using the second training data and the machine learning model trained by using the first training data; and evaluating the trained machine learning models based on the first accuracy difference. 7 . The evaluation method executed by the computer according to claim 6 , the evaluation method further comprising: calculating, by using the loss function, a second accuracy difference of the inference accuracy between the machine learning model trained by using the first training data and the machine learning model trained by using the second training data; replacing, in a case where a difference between the first accuracy difference and the second accuracy difference is a predetermined threshold or more, the first training data with the second training data to generate fourth training data that reduces the inference accuracy; training the machine learning model by using the fourth training data; and evaluating the machine learning model trained by using the fourth training data. 8 . An evaluation apparatus comprising: a memory; and a processor coupled to the memory, the processor being configured to perform processing including: generating, based on information that indicates a degree of reduction of inference accuracy of a machine learning model to a change in first training data, second training data that reduces the inference accuracy; training the machine learning model by using the second training data; and evaluating the trained machine learning model. 9 . A non-transitory computer-readable recording medium storing an evaluation program for causing a computer to perform processing including: generating, based on information that indicates a degree of reduction of inference accuracy of a machine learning model to a change in first training data, second training data that reduces the inference accuracy; training the machine learning model by using the second training data; and evaluating the trained machine learning model.
Machine learning · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.