Radar apparatus and methods for determining the presence of a reflective target using a multiple response comparison

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-2023213638-A1
Application number	US-202117565701-A
Country	US
Kind code	A1
Filing date	Dec 30, 2021
Priority date	Dec 30, 2021
Publication date	Jul 6, 2023
Grant date	—

Abstract

A method of processing radar responses of a radar system characterized by a plurality of beam patterns, to determine if a given response corresponds to a reflective object. The method including, for a first beam pattern, identifying a response at an identified angle relative to a center of the first beam pattern. Then, for a second beam pattern overlapping the first beam pattern, determining if a measured response in the second beam pattern at an angle relative to the center of the second beam pattern that corresponds to the identified angle relative to the center of the first beam pattern is within a predetermined error threshold of an anticipated response calculated using the second beam pattern and the first beam pattern. If the measured response in the second beam pattern is not within the predetermined error threshold, the first response is eliminated from display and/or further tracking.

First claim

What is claimed:

1 . A method of processing radar responses of a radar system characterized by a plurality of beam patterns, to determine if a given response corresponds to a reflective object, each beam pattern disposed in a different azimuthal direction, the method comprising:
for a first beam pattern of the plurality of beam patterns, identifying a response at an identified angle relative to a center of the first beam pattern; and for a second beam pattern of the plurality of beam patterns, the second beam pattern overlapping the first beam pattern, determining if a measured response in the second beam pattern at an angle relative to the center of the second beam pattern that corresponds to the identified angle relative to the center of the first beam pattern is within a predetermined error threshold of an anticipated response calculated using the second beam pattern and the first beam pattern.

2 . The method of claim 1 wherein, for a third beam pattern of the plurality of beam patterns that overlaps the first beam pattern, determining if a measured response in the third beam pattern at an angle relative to the center of the third beam pattern that corresponds to the identified angle relative to the center of the first beam pattern is within a predetermined error threshold of an anticipated response calculated using the third beam pattern and the first beam pattern.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the predetermined error threshold of an anticipated response calculated using the second beam pattern and the first beam pattern is equal to the error threshold of an anticipated response calculated using the third beam pattern and the first beam pattern.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first beam pattern and the second beam pattern are adjacent beam patterns.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising, before the step of identifying a response at an identified angle relative to a center of the first beam pattern, measuring a response at an angle relative to a center of an initial beam pattern, and
for each of a lagging beam of the initial beam pattern and a leading beam pattern of the initial beam pattern, determining the greatest magnitude of 1) the response of the initial beam pattern, 2) the measured response in lagging beam pattern at an angle relative to the center of the lagging beam pattern that corresponds to the identified angle relative to the center of the initial beam pattern, and 3) the measured response in leading beam at an angle relative to the center of the leading beam pattern that corresponds to the identified angle relative to the center of the initial beam pattern, and designating the beam pattern having greatest magnitude as the first beam pattern.

6 . The method of claim 1 further comprising, if the measured response in the second beam pattern is within the predetermined error threshold, at least one of 1) displaying a representation of an object corresponding to the first response and 2) further tracking the first response.

7 . The method of claim 1 further comprising, if the measured response in the second beam pattern is not within the predetermined error threshold, at least one of 1) eliminating from display a representation of an object corresponding to the first response and 2) eliminating the first response from further tracking.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the radar system is a monopulse radar system, and
wherein the step of identifying a response at an identified angle relative to a center of the first beam profile comprises measuring a first sum beam response and a first delta beam response, and wherein the step of determining if a measured response in the second beam profile is within a predetermined error threshold of an anticipated response calculated using the second beam pattern and the first beam pattern comprises 1) determining if a measured second sum beam response in the second beam pattern at an angle relative to the center of the second beam pattern that corresponds to the identified angle relative to the center of the first beam pattern is within a predetermined sum beam error threshold of an anticipated second sum beam response calculated using the second beam pattern and the first beam pattern, and 2) determining if a measured second delta beam response in the second beam pattern at an angle relative to the center of the second beam pattern that corresponds to the identified angle relative to the center of the first beam pattern is within a predetermined delta beam error threshold of an anticipated second delta beam response calculated using the second beam pattern and the first beam pattern.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the sum beam threshold and the delta beam threshold are equal to one another.

10 . A computer program stored on a non-transient storage medium and adapted to be run on a computer processor for processing radar responses of a radar system that produces a plurality of beam patterns, to determine if a given response corresponds to a reflective object, each receive beam pattern projected in a different azimuthal direction, the program comprising code comprising:
for a first beam pattern of the plurality of beam patterns, identifying a response at an identified angle relative to a center of the first beam pattern; and for a second beam pattern of the plurality of beam patterns, the second beam pattern overlapping the first beam pattern, determining if a measured response in the second beam pattern at an angle relative to the center of the second beam pattern that corresponds to the identified angle relative to the center of the first beam pattern is within a predetermined error threshold of an anticipated response calculated using the second beam pattern and the first beam pattern.

11 . The computer program of claim 10 , further comprising code to determine if the measured response in the second beam pattern is within the predetermined error threshold, and at least one of 1) displaying a representation of an object corresponding to the first response and 2) further tracking the first response.

12 . The computer program of claim 10 , further comprising code to determine if the measured response in the second beam pattern is not within the predetermined error threshold, and at least one of 1) eliminating from display a representation of an object corresponding to the first response and 2) eliminating the first response from further tracking.

13 . The computer program of claim 10 further comprising code to, for a third beam pattern of the plurality of beam patterns that overlaps the first beam pattern, determine if a measured response in the third beam pattern at an angle relative to the center of the third beam pattern that corresponds to the identified angle relative to the center of the first beam pattern is within a predetermined error threshold of an anticipated response calculated using the third beam pattern and the first beam pattern.

14 . The computer program of claim 13 , wherein the predetermined error threshold of an anticipated response calculated using the second beam pattern and the first beam pattern is equal to the error threshold of an anticipated response calculated using the third beam pattern and the first beam pattern.

15 . The computer program of claim 10 , wherein the first beam pattern and the second beam pattern are adjacent beam patterns.

16 . A radar system, comprising:
a transmitter to produce RF energy; a receiver adapted to generate a response upon detecting RF energy, the transmitter and detector characterized by a plurality of receive beam patterns, each of

Assignees

• Src Inc

Inventors

• Dougherty John C
• Weldum David L

Classifications

• G01S13/04 Primary

  Systems determining presence of a target (based on relative movement of target G01S13/56) · CPC title

• G01S7/414

  Discriminating targets with respect to background clutter · CPC title

• G01S7/412

  based on a comparison between measured values and known or stored values · CPC title

• G01S13/4445 Primary

  amplitude comparisons monopulse, i.e. comparing the echo signals received by an antenna arrangement with overlapping squinted beams · CPC title

• G01S7/403

  in azimuth, i.e. in the horizontal plane · CPC title