Dynamic prediction method and system for initiation volume of debris flow slope source
US-12106020-B2 · Oct 1, 2024 · US
US2023140905A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2023140905-A1 |
| Application number | US-202217982799-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Nov 8, 2022 |
| Priority date | Nov 8, 2021 |
| Publication date | May 11, 2023 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Implementations described and claimed herein provide systems and methods for a framework to achieve completion optimization for waterflood field reservoirs. The proposed methodology leverages adequate data collection, preprocessing, subject matter expert knowledge-based feature engineering for geological, reservoir and completion inputs, and state-of-the-art machine-learning technologies, to indicate important production drivers, provide sensitivity analysis to quantify the impacts of the completion features, and ultimately achieve completion optimization. In this analytical framework, model-less feature ranking based on mutual information concept and model-dependent sensitivity analyses, in which a variety of machine-learning models are trained and validated, provides comprehensive multi-variant analyses that empower subject-matter experts to make a smarter decision in a timely manner.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A method for generating a forecast model of a well field, the method comprising: combining raw field data from a plurality of wells of the well field with user-based data received from a user interface to generate an input dataset; training, based on the input dataset and utilizing a deep learning computing technique, a plurality of completion forecast models; and generating an optimized production forecast model from the plurality of trained completion forecast models. 2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: interpreting the plurality of completion forecast models based on one or more model-agnostic evaluation techniques. 3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein training of the plurality of completion forecast models comprises executing a plurality of different modeling techniques with the input dataset. 4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the plurality of different modeling techniques is at least one of a tree-based modeling technique or a deep neural network technique. 5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: expanding the raw field data through one of a scatter plot of the raw field data or a box plot of the raw field data. 6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: displaying, on the user interface, a generated result of the optimized production forecast model based on a well completion dataset 7 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: recursively executing the optimized production forecast model to generate a completion prediction of a well of the well field, the optimized production forecast model receiving measured production data from the field data. 8 . One or more tangible non-transitory computer-readable storage media storing computer-executable instructions for performing a computer process on a computing system, the computer process comprising: combining raw field data from a plurality of wells of a well field with user-based data received from a user interface to generate an input dataset; training, based on the input dataset and utilizing a deep learning computing technique, a plurality of completion forecast models; and generating an optimized production forecast model from the plurality of trained completion forecast models. 9 . The one or more tangible non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 8 , the computer process further comprising: interpreting the plurality of completion forecast models based on one or more model-agnostic evaluation techniques. 10 . The one or more tangible non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 8 , wherein training of the plurality of completion forecast models comprises executing a plurality of different modeling techniques with the input dataset. 11 . The one or more tangible non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10 , wherein the plurality of different modeling techniques is at least one of a tree-based modeling technique or a deep neural network technique. 12 . The one or more tangible non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 8 , the computer process further comprising: expanding the raw field data through one of a scatter plot of the raw field data or a box plot of the raw field data. 13 . The one or more tangible non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 8 , the computer process further comprising: displaying, on the user interface, a generated result of the optimized production forecast model based on a well completion dataset 14 . The one or more tangible non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 8 , the computer process further comprising: recursively executing the optimized production forecast model to generate a completion prediction of a well of the well field, the optimized production forecast model receiving measured production data from the field data. 15 . A system for generating a forecast model of a well field, the system comprising: a waterflood completion optimization system having at least one processor configured to train a plurality of completion forecast models using a deep learning computing technique and based on an input dataset, the input dataset generated by combining raw field data from a plurality of wells of the well field with user-based data, the waterflood completion optimization system generating an optimized production forecast model from the plurality of trained completion forecast models. 16 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the user-based data is received from a user interface presented by a user device. 17 . The system of claim 16 , wherein the user interface is configured to present a generated result of the optimized production forecast model based on a well completion dataset. 18 . The system of claim 15 , wherein training of the plurality of completion forecast models comprises executing a plurality of different modeling techniques with the input dataset. 19 . The system of claim 15 , wherein waterflood completion optimization system expands the raw field data through one of a scatter plot of the raw field data or a box plot of the raw field data. 20 . The system of claim 15 , wherein waterflood completion optimization system recursively executes the optimized production forecast model to generate a completion prediction of a well of the well field, the optimized production forecast model receiving measured production data from the field data.
Fuzzy logic, artificial intelligence, neural networks or the like · CPC title
Probabilistic graphical models, e.g. probabilistic networks · CPC title
Combinations of networks · CPC title
Ensemble learning · CPC title
Recurrent networks, e.g. Hopfield networks · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.