Method, system and computer program product for monitoring a shaping process

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-2022404792-A1
Application number	US-202217843082-A
Country	US
Kind code	A1
Filing date	Jun 17, 2022
Priority date	Jun 21, 2021
Publication date	Dec 22, 2022
Grant date	—

Abstract

A method for monitoring a molding process carried out in cycles includes determining at least two nearest neighbors in the form of cycle data from at least two past cycles, such that the cycle data of the at least two nearest neighbors lie nearer to the current cycle data than the cycle data which do not pertain to the at least two nearest neighbors. Only those past cycles for which quality data are contained in the data collection are used for the determination of the at least two nearest neighbors. A predictability criterion is checked to determine whether a quality variation of the quality data of the cycles of the at least two nearest neighbors is smaller than a maximum variation and/or larger than a minimum variation. If the predictability criterion is not met, a first notification that a quality and/or a quality datum of the molded part is not reliably predictable is issued.

First claim

1 . A method for monitoring a molding process carried out in cycles, wherein a data collection is provided which contains at least the following data:
in each case cycle data of the molding process carried out on a molding machine for past cycles, and quality data from molded parts produced using the molding machine for at least some of the past cycles, and wherein, with the molding machine, at least one further cycle of the molding process is carried out as well as current cycle data of the at least one further cycle are gathered, wherein the following further steps are carried out: determining at least two nearest neighbors in the form of the cycle data from at least two of the past cycles, such that the cycle data of the at least two nearest neighbors lie nearer to the current cycle data than the cycle data which do not pertain to the at least two nearest neighbors, wherein only those past cycles for which quality data are contained in the data collection are used for the determination of the at least two nearest neighbors, checking a predictability criterion, wherein it is checked whether a quality variation of the quality data of the cycles of the at least two nearest neighbors is smaller than a maximum variation and/or larger than a minimum variation and, if the predictability criterion is not met, issuing a first notification that a quality and/or a quality datum of the molded part produced with the at least one further cycle is not reliably predictable.

2 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the quality variation is calculated as a—preferably normalized—difference between a maximum quality value of the at least two nearest neighbors and a minimum quality value of the at least two nearest neighbors.

3 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the quality variation of the quality data is used in the checking of the predictability criterion in a form wherein the quality variation is correlated with a cycle data variation of the cycle data of the at least two nearest neighbors.

4 . The method according to claim 3 , wherein the cycle data variation is calculated as a—preferably normalized—maximum distance between the at least two nearest neighbors.

5 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein, if the prediction criterion is met, a quality prognosis based on the cycle data and the quality data is calculated and issued.

6 . The method according to claim 5 , wherein the quality prognosis is calculated by at least one of the following:
arithmetic mean of the quality data of the cycles of the at least two nearest neighbors, median of the quality data of the cycles of the at least two nearest neighbors, multilinear regression model.

7 . The method according to claim 5 , wherein, if the quality prognosis lies outside a predefined tolerance range, at least one of the following steps is carried out for at least one subsequent cycle—preferably several subsequent cycles:
activating a device for gathering quality data and/or
prompting an operator to gather the quality data and/or
actuating a reject gate and/or
depositing at least one molded part produced in the at least one further cycle in an inspection tray and/or
marking at least one molded part produced in the at least one further cycle.

8 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein, if the predictability criterion is not met, at least one of the following steps is carried out for at least one subsequent cycle—preferably several subsequent cycles:
activating a device for gathering quality data, and/or
prompting an operator to gather the quality data, and/or
actuating a reject gate, and/or
depositing at least one molded part produced in the at least one further cycle in an inspection tray and/or
marking at least one molded part produced in the at least one further cycle.

9 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein
in the context of an anomaly check, it is checked whether the current cycle data constitute an outlier and, if this is the case, a second notification is issued.

10 . The method, in particular according to claim 1 , for monitoring a molding process carried out in cycles, wherein a data collection is provided which contains at least the following data:
in each case cycle data of the molding process carried out on a molding machine for past cycles and quality data from molded parts produced using the molding machine for at least some of the past cycles,
and wherein, with the molding machine, at least one further cycle of the molding process is carried out as well as current cycle data of the at least one further cycle are gathered, wherein, in the context of an anomaly check, it is checked whether the current cycle data constitute an outlier and, if this is the case, at least one of the following steps is carried out for at least one subsequent cycle—preferably several subsequent cycles:
activating a device for gathering quality data and/or
prompting an operator to gather the quality data and/or
actuating a reject gate and/or
depositing at least one molded part produced in the at least one further cycle in an inspection tray and/or
marking at least one molded part produced in the at least one further cycle.

11 . The method according to claim 9 , wherein the anomaly check is carried out by means of angle-based outlier detection.

12 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the quality data of the past cycles are gathered by measurement on the molded parts and/or by human assessment of the molded parts.

13 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the cycle data and/or the current cycle data contain setting data for the molding machine, which are assigned to the past cycles or to the at least one further cycle, respectively.

14 . The method according to claim 13 , wherein the cycle data and the current cycle data contain setting data of the molding machine, wherein,
in the context of a setting check, it is checked whether a setting distance between the setting data assigned to the at least one further cycle and the setting data of the cycle data is smaller than a predetermined maximum setting distance and, if this is not the case, a third notification is issued.

15 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the cycle data and/or the quality data are transformed and dimension-reduced and in that the transformed and dimension-reduced cycle data and/or the transformed and dimension-reduced quality data are used for the determination of the at least two nearest neighbors and/or for the checking of the predictability criterion and/or the anomaly check.

16 . The method according to claim 15 , wherein the cycle data and/or the quality data are transformed and dimension-reduced by a multilinear regression model, in particular a partial least squares regression and/or a principal component regression.

17 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the cycle data and/or the current cycle data contain process data, which are gathered during the past cycles and/or during the at least one further cycle by process measurement and/or reading out of a machine control system, wherein the process measurement and/or the reading out of the machine control system is carried out on the molding machine itself or a molding system which contains the molding machine.

18 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein
the current cycle data are added to the cycle data and/or, if current quality data are present for the at least one further cycle, the current quality data are added to the quality data.

19 . A computer program pr

Assignees

• Engel Austria Gmbh

Inventors

• Braun Patrick
• Koppauer Herwig

Classifications

• B29C45/76

  Measuring, controlling or regulating {(measuring in general G01; controlling or regulating in general G05)} · CPC title

• G06Q10/06395 Primary

  Quality analysis or management · CPC title

• B29C2948/92009

  Measured parameter · CPC title

• B29C2945/76936

  The operating conditions are corrected in the next phase or cycle · CPC title

• B29C45/7686

  the ejected articles, e.g. weight control · CPC title