System for reducing transaction failure
US-12175472-B2 · Dec 24, 2024 · US
US2022207407A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2022207407-A1 |
| Application number | US-202017134430-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Dec 27, 2020 |
| Priority date | Dec 27, 2020 |
| Publication date | Jun 30, 2022 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Systems, devices, and techniques are disclosed for localization of machine learning models trained with global data. Data sets of event data for users may be received. The data sets may belong to separate groups. The data sets of event data may be combined to generate a global data set. A matrix factorization model may be trained using the global data set to generate a globally trained matrix factorization model. A localization group data set may be generated including event data from the global data set for users from a first of the groups. The globally trained matrix factorization model may be trained with the localization group data set to generate a localized matrix factorization model for the first of the groups.
Opening claim text (preview).
1 . A computer-implemented method comprising: receiving two or more data sets of event data for users wherein each of the two or more data sets belongs a separate one of two or more groups; combining the two or more data sets of event data to generate a global data set; training a matrix factorization model using the global data set to generate a globally trained matrix factorization model; generating a localization group data set comprising event data from the global data set for users from a first of the two or more groups; and training the globally trained matrix factorization model with the localization group data set to generate a localized matrix factorization model for the first of the two or more groups. 2 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: generating a second localization group data set comprising event data from the global data set for users from a second of the two or more groups, wherein the second localization group data set is different from the localization group data set; and training the globally trained matrix factorization model with the second localization group data set to generate a localized matrix factorization model for the second of the two or more groups. 3 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein combining the two or more data sets of event data to generate a global data set comprises combining event data from the two or more data sets to generate a global semi-sparse matrix comprising the event data. 4 . The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , wherein training a matrix factorization model using the global data set to generate a globally trained matrix factorization model comprises performing non-negative matrix factorization on the global semi-sparse matrix to generate the globally trained matrix factorization model, wherein the globally trained matrix factorization model comprises a dense matrix with no empty values. 5 . The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein training the globally trained matrix factorization model with the localization group data set to generate a localized matrix factorization model for the first of the two or more groups further comprises: unioning the localization group data set with the globally trained matrix factorization model to generate a local semi-sparse matrix; and performing non-negative matrix factorization on the local semi-sparse matrix to generate the localized matrix factorization model for the first of the two or more groups, wherein the localized matrix factorization model for the first of the two or more groups comprises a dense matrix with no empty values. 6 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the two or more groups are tenants of a multi-tenant database, and wherein the event data for users is stored in the multi-tenant database. 7 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the event data comprises values indicating user preferences based on interactions with products or items offered by the two or more groups. 8 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving user data for a user of the first of the two or more groups; generating a recommendation for the user of the first of the two or more groups using the user data and the localized matrix factorization model for the first of the two or more groups; and sending the recommendation to the user of the first of the two or more groups using at least one type of electronic communication. 9 . A computer-implemented system for localization of matrix factorization models trained with global data comprising: one or more storage devices; and a processor that receives two or more data sets of event data for users wherein each of the two or more data sets belongs a separate one of two or more groups, combines the two or more data sets of event data to generate a global data set, trains a matrix factorization model using the global data set to generate a globally trained matrix factorization model, generates a localization group data set comprising event data from the global data set for users from a first of the two or more groups, and trains the globally trained matrix factorization model with the localization group data set to generate a localized matrix factorization model for the first of the two or more groups. 10 . The computer-implemented system of claim 9 , wherein the processor further generates a second localization group data set comprising event data from the global data set for users from a second of the two or more groups, wherein the second localization group data set is different from the localization group data set, and trains the globally trained matrix factorization model with the second localization group data set to generate a localized matrix factorization model for the second of the two or more groups. 11 . The computer-implemented system of claim 9 , wherein the processor combines the two or more data sets of event data to generate a global data set by combining event data from the two or more data sets to generate a global semi-sparse matrix comprising the event data. 12 . The computer-implemented system of claim 11 , wherein the processor trains a matrix factorization model using the global data set to generate a globally trained matrix factorization model by performing non-negative matrix factorization on the global semi-sparse matrix to generate the globally trained matrix factorization model, wherein the globally trained matrix factorization model comprises a dense matrix with no empty values. 13 . The computer-implemented system of claim 12 , wherein the processor trains the globally trained matrix factorization model with the localization group data set to generate a localized matrix factorization model for the first of the two or more groups further by unioning the localization group data set with the globally trained matrix factorization model to generate a local semi-sparse matrix and performing non-negative matrix factorization on the local semi-sparse matrix to generate the localized matrix factorization model for the first of the two or more groups, wherein the localized matrix factorization model for the first of the two or more groups comprises a dense matrix with no empty values. 14 . The computer-implemented system of claim 9 , wherein the two or more groups are tenants of a multi-tenant database, and wherein the event data for users is stored in the multi-tenant database. 15 . The computer-implemented system of claim 9 , wherein the event data comprises values indicating user preferences based on interactions with products or items offered by the two or more groups. 16 . The computer-implemented system of claim 9 , wherein the processor further receives user data for a user of the first of the two or more groups, generates a recommendation for the user of the first of the two or more groups using the user data and the localized matrix factorization model for the first of the two or more groups, and sends the recommendation to the user of the first of the two or more groups using at least one type of electronic communication. 17 . A system comprising: one or more computers and one or more storage devices storing instructions which are operable, when executed by the one or more computers, to cause the one or more computers to perform operations comprising: receiving two or more data sets of event data for users wherein each of the two or more data sets belongs a separate one of two or more groups; combining the two or more data sets of event data to generate a global data set; tra
Matrix or vector computation {, e.g. matrix-matrix or matrix-vector multiplication, matrix factorization (matrix transposition G06F7/78)} · CPC title
Machine learning · CPC title
Search customisation based on user profiles and personalisation · CPC title
Query processing support for facilitating data mining operations in structured databases · CPC title
Inference or reasoning models · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.