Sensing system and time stamp correction method
US-2020236517-A1 · Jul 23, 2020 · US
US2021103046A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2021103046-A1 |
| Application number | US-202017038826-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Sep 30, 2020 |
| Priority date | Oct 4, 2019 |
| Publication date | Apr 8, 2021 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A wireless ranging system employs interference tolerance parameters in to reduce the effects of wireless interference on device performance (e.g. power consumption). As part of a wireless ranging session, each device identifies one or more wireless ranging parameters that indicate one or more limits (e.g. time limits, sample limits, and the like) corresponding to different portions of the ranging session. In response to a limit indicated by the interference tolerance parameters being reached prior to completion of the wireless ranging session, the wireless ranging system can take remedial action.
Opening claim text (preview).
1 . A method comprising: identifying a first interference tolerance parameter for distance estimation at a first device; for a first distance estimation session: initiating transmission and receipt of a plurality of packets to generate a plurality of time-of-flight values; in response to determining a first timeout condition based on the first interference tolerance parameter, exiting the first distance estimation session without completing transmission and reception of the plurality of packets; and in response to completing the first distance estimation session: generating an effective time-of-flight value based on a combination of the plurality of the time-of-flight values; and identifying a distance between the first device and as second device based on the effective time-of-flight value. 2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first interference tolerance parameter comprises a number of total samples, each sample indicating one of a transmit time and a receive time of a corresponding packet of the plurality of packets. 3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first interference tolerance parameter comprises a number of samples associated with a first frequency, each sample indicating one of a transmit time and a receive time of a corresponding packet of the plurality of packets. 4 . The method of claim 3 , further comprising: for the first distance estimation session, changing a frequency of transmission from the first frequency to a second frequency in response to transmitting the number of samples associated with the first frequency. 5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first interference tolerance parameter comprises a number of sample retries, each sample indicating one of a transmit time and a receive time of a corresponding packet of the plurality of packets. 6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first interference tolerance parameter comprises a total duration associated with the first distance estimation session. 7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first interference tolerance parameter comprises a per-sample duration associated with each sample of the first distance estimation session, each sample indicating one of a transmit time and a receive time of a corresponding packet of the plurality of packets. 8 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: identifying a second interference tolerance parameter for distance estimation at the first device; and for the first distance estimation session: in response to determining a second timeout condition based on the second interference tolerance parameter, exiting the first distance estimation session without completing transmission and reception of the plurality of packets. 9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the first interference tolerance parameter comprises receiving the first interference tolerance parameter from a second device to initiate the first distance estimation session. 10 . A device, comprising: a radio configured to transmit and receive a plurality of packets; a counter configured to generate a first plurality of counts, each of the first plurality of counts indicative of a transmit time of a corresponding packet; the counter further configured to generate a second plurality of counts, each of the second plurality of counts indicative of a receive time of a corresponding packet; a processor configured to: identify a first interference tolerance parameter for distance estimation at a first device; for a first distance estimation session: initiate transmission and receipt of a plurality of packets to generate a plurality of time-of-flight values; in response to determining a first timeout condition based on the first interference tolerance parameter, exit the first distance estimation session without completing transmission and reception of the plurality of packets; and in response to completing the first distance estimation session: generate an effective time-of-flight value based on a combination of the first plurality of the time-of-flight values; and identify a distance between the first device and as second device based on the effective time-of-flight value. 11 . The device of claim 10 , wherein the first interference tolerance parameter comprises a number of total samples, each sample indicating one of a transmit time and a receive time of a corresponding packet of the plurality of packets. 12 . The device of claim 10 or 11 , wherein the first interference tolerance parameter comprises a number of samples associated with a first frequency, each sample indicating one of a transmit time and a receive time of a corresponding packet of the plurality of packets. 13 . The device of claim 12 , wherein the processor is configured to: for the first distance estimation session, change a frequency of transmission from the first frequency to a second frequency in response to transmitting the number of samples associated with the first frequency. 14 . The device of claim 10 , wherein the first interference tolerance parameter comprises a number of sample retries, each sample indicating one of a transmit time and a receive time of a corresponding packet of the plurality of packets. 15 . The device of claim 10 , wherein the first interference tolerance parameter comprises a total duration associated with the first distance estimation session. 16 . The device of claim 10 , wherein the first interference tolerance parameter comprises a per-sample duration associated with each sample of the first distance estimation session, each sample indicating one of a transmit time and a receive time of a corresponding packet of the plurality of packets. 17 . The device of claim 10 , wherein the processor is configured to: identify a second interference tolerance parameter for distance estimation at the first device; and for the first distance estimation session: in response to determining a second timeout condition based on the second interference tolerance parameter, exit the first distance estimation session without completing transmission and reception of the plurality of packets. 18 . The device of claim 10 , wherein the processor is configured to receive the first interference tolerance parameter from a second device to initiate the first distance estimation session. 19 . A method, comprising: during a first distance estimation session to determine a distance between a first device and a second device: transmitting and receiving a plurality of packets to generate a first plurality of time of flight values; in response to determining a timeout condition based on at least one of the plurality of interference tolerance parameters, changing a frequency of transmission associated with transmitting the plurality of packets. 20 . The method of claim 19 , wherein the plurality of interference tolerance parameters includes at least one of a number of total samples, a number of samples associated with a transmission frequency of the first plurality of packets, a number of sample retries, and a total duration of the first distance estimation session.
Interference mitigation, e.g. reducing or avoiding non-intentional interference with other HF-transmitters, base station transmitters for mobile communication or other radar systems, e.g. using electro-magnetic interference [EMI] reduction techniques (auxiliary means for detecting or identifying radar signals or the like G01S7/021; means for anti-jamming G01S7/36) · CPC title
with exchange of information between interrogator and responder · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.