Machine learning collaboration techniques
US-2024420212-A1 · Dec 19, 2024 · US
US2020410055A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2020410055-A1 |
| Application number | US-201916455122-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Jun 27, 2019 |
| Priority date | Jun 27, 2019 |
| Publication date | Dec 31, 2020 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Systems and methods for improving business communication are provided. The system includes a processor, a memory, and a user interface coupled to each of the processor, and the memory. The processor is configured to receive and read the text of a business communication; identify one or more words in the text of the business communication for evaluation of objectivity, apply an objectivity rule and generate an objectivity score for the one or more identified words. The method further determines whether the objectivity score is low using a control table and provides a replacement word for an identified word having a low objectivity score.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A system for improving business communication, the system comprising: a processor; a memory; and a user interface coupled to each of the processor, and the memory, wherein the processor is configured to: receive, from a client device, a text of a business communication; read the text of a business communication; identify one or more words in the text of the business communication for evaluation of objectivity; apply an objectivity rule; and generate an objectivity score for the one or more identified words. 2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more words identified in the business communication is assigned an objectivity score. 3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more words identified in the business communication is compared with a library comprised of one or more replacement words based on semantic properties of the word, and assigned a score based on the objectivity. 4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the algorithm is a natural language processing algorithm. 5 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the natural language processing algorithm is an unsupervised algorithm. 6 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the natural language processing algorithm is a supervised algorithm. 7 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the natural language processing algorithm is a semi-supervised algorithm. 8 . A method for improving business communication, the method comprising the steps of: reading a text of a business communication; identifying one or more words in the text of the business communication for evaluation of objectivity; applying an objectivity rule; generating an objectivity score for the one or more identified words; comparing the objectivity score with a score control table; and identifying a replacement word for an identified word with a low objectivity score. 9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein, the business communication comprises of an email, a report, a news article, a press release, a newsletter, or a letter. 10 . A system for improving business communication, the system comprising: a processor; a memory; and a user interface coupled to each of the processor, and the memory, wherein the processor is configured to: receive, from a client device, a text of a business communication; read the text of a business communication; identify one or more words in the text of the business communication for evaluation of objectivity; apply an objectivity rule; generate an objectivity score for the one or more identified words; compare the objectivity score with a control table; determine whether the objectivity score is low; and identify a replacement word in a library for a word with a low objectivity score. 11 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the one or more words identified in the business communication is assigned an objectivity score. 12 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the one or more words identified in the business communication is compared with a library comprised of one or more replacement words based on semantic properties of the word, and assigned a score based on the objectivity. 13 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the algorithm is a natural language processing algorithm. 14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the natural language processing algorithm is an unsupervised algorithm. 15 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the natural language processing algorithm is a supervised algorithm. 16 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the natural language processing algorithm is a semi-supervised algorithm.
by ranking or filtering the set of features, e.g. using a measure of variance or of feature cross-correlation · CPC title
Supervised learning · CPC title
Weakly supervised learning, e.g. semi-supervised or self-supervised learning · CPC title
Office automation; Time management · CPC title
Machine learning · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.