Method for analyzing quantum vulnerability and system therefor
US-2024333484-A1 · Oct 3, 2024 · US
US2020349400A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2020349400-A1 |
| Application number | US-201916399677-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Apr 30, 2019 |
| Priority date | Apr 30, 2019 |
| Publication date | Nov 5, 2020 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
An artefact is received. Features are extracted from this artefact which are, in turn, used to populate a vector. The vector is then input into a classification model to generate a score. The score is then modified using a step function so that the true score is not obfuscated. Thereafter, the modified score can be provided to a consuming application or process. Related apparatus, systems, techniques and articles are also described.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A computer-implemented method comprising: receiving an artefact; extracting features from the artefact and populating a vector; inputting the vector into a classification model to generate a score; modifying the score using a step function; and providing the modified score to a consuming application or process. 2 . The method of claim 1 further comprising reducing features in the vector prior to the inputting into the classification model. 3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the features are reduced using random projection matrices. 4 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the features are reduced using principal component analysis. 5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the classification model is a machine learning model trained using a training data set and providing a continuous scale output. 6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the classification model characterizes the artefact as being malicious or benign to access, execute, or continue to execute. 7 . The method of claim 6 further comprising: preventing access or execution of the artefact when the classification model characterizes the artefact as being malicious. 8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the machine learning model comprises one or more of: a logistic regression model, a neural network, a concurrent neural network, a recurrent neural network, a generative adversarial network, a support vector machine, a random forest, or a Bayesian model. 9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the step function applies position-dependent noise to the score. 10 . A system comprising: at least one data processor; and memory storing instructions which, when executed by the at least one data processor, result in operations comprising: receiving an artefact; extracting features from the artefact and populating a vector; inputting the vector into a classification model to generate a score; modifying the score using a step function; and providing the modified score to a consuming application or process. 11 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the operations further comprising: reducing features in the vector prior to the inputting into the classification model. 12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the features are reduced using random projection matrices. 13 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the features are reduced using principal component analysis. 14 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the classification model is a machine learning model trained using a training data set and providing a continuous scale output. 15 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the classification model characterizes the artefact as being malicious or benign to access, execute, or continue to execute. 16 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the operations further comprise: preventing access or execution of the artefact when the classification model characterizes the artefact as being malicious. 17 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the machine learning model comprises one or more of: a logistic regression model, a neural network, a concurrent neural network, a recurrent neural network, a generative adversarial network, a support vector machine, a random forest, or a Bayesian model. 18 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the step function applies position-dependent noise to the score. 19 . A computer-implemented method comprising: receiving a file; extracting features from the file and populating a vector; inputting the vector into a classification model to generate a score, the classification model being a machine learning model trained to characterize a likelihood of the file as being malicious; obfuscating the score using a step function; and providing the modified score to a consuming application or process. 20 . The method of claim 19 further comprising: preventing access or execution of the artefact when the classification model characterizes the artefact as being malicious.
Static detection · CPC title
based on the proximity to a decision surface, e.g. support vector machines · CPC title
based on approximation criteria, e.g. principal component analysis · CPC title
Classification techniques · CPC title
Generative networks · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.