Iterative widening search for designing chemical compounds
US-2018253453-A1 · Sep 6, 2018 · US
US2020342960A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2020342960-A1 |
| Application number | US-201716628976-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Jul 6, 2017 |
| Priority date | Jul 6, 2017 |
| Publication date | Oct 29, 2020 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Disclosed is a target-based drug screening method using inverse quantitative structure-(drug)performance relationships (QSPR) analysis and molecular dynamics simulation. The method includes modeling a molecular structure of a test compound group against a target molecule, obtaining a quantitative structure-(drug)performance relationships (QSPR) of the test compound group, acquiring the optimal pharmacophore of a novel target-based drug through a numerical inversion of the QSPR, and selecting drug candidates having a molecular structure similar to the optimum pharmacophore from the test compound group.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A target-based drug screening method using inverse quantitative structure-performance relationships analysis and molecular dynamics simulation, the method comprising: a molecular structure modeling step of modeling a molecular structure of a test compound group against a target molecule; a quantitative structure-performance relationships (QSPR) model creation step of obtaining a quantitative structure-performance relationships of the test compound group; an optimum pharmacophore acquisition step of acquiring an optimum pharmacophore of a novel drug through a numerical inversion of the quantitative structure-performance relationships (QSPR); and a target-based drug candidate group screening step of selecting drug candidates having a molecular structure similar to the optimum pharmacophore. 2 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the molecular structure modeling step comprises: a compound selection process of selecting the test compound group; a data reception process of receiving biological experimental data and chemical experimental data of the test compound group; and a molecular structure modeling process of optimizing the molecular structure of the test compound group on the basis of the experimental data through a modeling method. 3 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the quantitative structure-performance relationships model creation step comprises: a molecular descriptor calculation process of producing molecular descriptors from the molecular structure; and a quantitative structure-performance relationships modeling process of modeling the quantitative structure-performance relationships on the basis of the molecular descriptors. 4 . The method according to claim 3 , wherein in the quantitative structure-performance relationships (QSPR), the performance comprises one or more performances selected from among biological activity, inhibitory activity, lipophilicity, toxicity, metabolic stability and blood-brain barrier permeability. 5 . The method according to claim 3 , wherein the quantitative structure-performance modeling process selects one or more molecular descriptors from among the produced molecular descriptors by using a genetic algorithm and models the quantitative structure-performance by using the selected molecular descriptors. 6 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the optimum pharmacophore acquisition step acquires the optimum pharmacophore of the novel drug through a numerical inversion process according to Expression 1 or Expression 2, x *=arg max log {circumflex over (k)} w s.t log {circumflex over (k)} w =C{circumflex over (t)} {circumflex over (t)}=Px {circumflex over (t)} T S t −1 t≤c 1 ∥P{circumflex over (t)}−x∥≤c 2 Expression 1 where x is a vector of molecular descriptors of a novel drug candidate, x* is a vector of molecular descriptors of an optimal drug calculated from a mathematical programming formula of Expression 1, C is an output variable loading matrix of partial least squares (PLS), t is a score vector of input variables (being molecular descriptors x herein), P is a loading matrix of PLS, {circumflex over ( )} is a prediction value produced by a PLS model, S t is a sample covariance matrix of t, and c 1 and c 2 are appropriate constants, and x * = argmax ( log k w - log k w , ref ) 2 + ( log k i - log k i , ref ) 2 s . t [ log k ^ w
Screening of libraries · CPC title
Prediction of properties of chemical compounds, compositions or mixtures · CPC title
Computational theoretical chemistry, i.e. ICT specially adapted for theoretical aspects of quantum chemistry, molecular mechanics, molecular dynamics or the like · CPC title
Molecular design, e.g. of drugs · CPC title
Identification of molecular entities, parts thereof or of chemical compositions · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.