System And Method For Recommending Automation Solutions For Technology Infrastructure Issues

US2020162312A1 · US · A1

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-2020162312-A1
Application numberUS-201816237469-A
CountryUS
Kind codeA1
Filing dateDec 31, 2018
Priority dateNov 19, 2018
Publication dateMay 21, 2020
Grant date

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

A system and method to intelligently formulate automation strategies for technology infrastructure operations are disclosed. The system and method include analyzing infrastructure issue data from support tickets and predicting automation solutions. A cost-benefit analysis is then performed on the automation solutions. Solutions can be ranked and recommended according to the cost-benefit analysis.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

We claim: 1 . A method of predicting automation solutions for technology infrastructure issues, the method comprising: analyzing information related to a plurality of technology infrastructure issues; extracting a set of data features corresponding to the plurality of technology infrastructure issues; identifying a first set of technology infrastructure issues and predicting a first automation solution for the first set of technology infrastructure issues; identifying a second set of technology infrastructure issues and predicting a second automation solution for the second set of technology infrastructure issues; estimating a first cost-savings amount associated with implementing the first automation solution for the first set of technology infrastructure issues; estimating a second cost-savings amount associated with implementing the second automation solution for the second set of technology infrastructure issues; and ranking the first automation solution higher than the second automation solution when the first cost-savings amount is greater than the second cost-savings amount. 2 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the method includes the steps of receiving a plurality of technology infrastructure support tickets; and retrieving the information related to the plurality of technology infrastructure issues from the plurality of technology infrastructure support tickets. 3 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein analyzing information related to the plurality of infrastructure issues includes identify sequences of related technology infrastructure issues. 4 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein extracting the set of data features includes: converting the information related to the plurality of technology infrastructure issues into vectors in a vectors space; and calculating the cosine similarity between the vectors in the vector space and a unit vector in the vector space. 5 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein predicting the first automation solution includes using a Multinomial Naïve Bayes analysis and a Gradient Boosting Machine. 6 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the method includes using information from an infrastructure knowledge base, the infrastructure knowledge base including information about a set of activities and automation solutions for the set of activities. 7 . The method according to claim 6 , wherein the method further includes periodically updating the infrastructure knowledge base. 8 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the method includes producing a plurality of solutions corresponding to different groups of technology infrastructure issues, ranking the plurality of solutions, and recommending a subset of ranked solutions. 9 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the method includes predicting a technology associated with the first automation solution, and wherein the technology is predicted by analyzing verbs in the information related to the plurality of technology infrastructure issues. 10 . The method according to claim 9 , wherein the technology is a software scripting technology. 11 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein extracting features includes applying a term frequency-inverse document frequency matrix to a set of words associated with one or more technology infrastructure issues. 12 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing software comprising instructions that are executable by one or more device processors to predict automation solutions for technology infrastructure issues by: analyzing information related to a plurality of technology infrastructure issues; extracting a set of data features corresponding to the plurality of technology infrastructure issues; identifying a first set of technology infrastructure issues and predicting a first automation solution for the first set of technology infrastructure issues; identifying a second set of technology infrastructure issues and predicting a second automation solution for the second set of technology infrastructure issues; estimating a first cost-savings amount associated with implementing the first automation solution for the first set of technology infrastructure issues; estimating a second cost-savings amount associated with implementing the second automation solution for the second set of technology infrastructure issues; and ranking the first automation solution higher than the second automation solution when the first cost-savings amount is greater than the second cost-savings amount. 13 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein analyzing the information includes determining sequences of infrastructure issues. 14 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein determining sequences includes using a random forest algorithm. 15 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein determining sequences includes using an unsupervised rule induction and affinity analysis. 16 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein extracting the set of data features includes using a non-linear classification algorithm. 17 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the instructions are executable to predict automation solutions by producing a plurality of solutions corresponding to different groups of technology infrastructure issues, ranking the plurality of solutions, and recommending a subset of ranked solutions. 18 . A system for predicting automation solutions for technology infrastructure issues, the system comprising: a device processor; and a non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions that are executable by the device processor to: analyze information related to a plurality of technology infrastructure issues; extract a set of data features corresponding to the plurality of technology infrastructure issues; identify a first set of technology infrastructure issues and predict a first automation solution for the first set of technology infrastructure issues; identify a second set of technology infrastructure issues and predict a second automation solution for the second set of technology infrastructure issues; estimate a first cost-savings amount associated with implementing the first automation solution for the first set of technology infrastructure issues; estimate a second cost-savings amount associated with implementing the second automation solution for the second set of technology infrastructure issues; and rank the first automation solution higher than the second automation solution when the first cost-savings amount is greater than the second cost-savings amount. 19 . The system according to claim 18 , wherein to estimate a first cost-savings amount, the instructions are executable by the device processor to calculate the manual effort spent performing an activity associated with the first automation solution. 20 . The system according to claim 19 , wherein the instructions are executable by the device processor to predict a break-even time for recovering costs associated with the first automation solution.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • using logs of notifications; Post-processing of notifications · CPC title

  • Handling of user complaints or trouble tickets · CPC title

  • Additional information in the notification, e.g. enhancement of specific meta-data · CPC title

  • using statistical methods · CPC title

  • using ranking · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US2020162312A1 cover?
A system and method to intelligently formulate automation strategies for technology infrastructure operations are disclosed. The system and method include analyzing infrastructure issue data from support tickets and predicting automation solutions. A cost-benefit analysis is then performed on the automation solutions. Solutions can be ranked and recommended according to the cost-benefit analysis.
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Accenture Global Solutions Ltd
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06N5/022. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Thu May 21 2020 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (A1). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 3 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).