Session slicing of mirrored packets
US-12184680-B2 · Dec 31, 2024 · US
US2020036738A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2020036738-A1 |
| Application number | US-201916453370-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Jun 26, 2019 |
| Priority date | Jul 30, 2018 |
| Publication date | Jan 30, 2020 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method for detecting anomalies in a computer network, in which a message transmitted over the computer network is received or recorded by a node of the computer network; based on at least the message, it is checked by a detection mechanism of the node whether the anomalies have occurred, and an occurrence of the anomalies is either confirmed or refuted according to a predefined detection rule of the detection mechanism.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A method for detecting anomalies in a computer network, comprising: receiving or recording, by a node of the computer network, a message transmitted over the computer network; based at least on the message, checking, by a detection mechanism of the node, whether an anomaly has occurred; and confirming or refuting an occurrence of the anomaly according to a predefined detection rule of the detection mechanism. 2 . The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the computer network includes a switching device and terminals, and the node is one of the terminals. 3 . The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the message is received, and the checking further takes place based on at least one present state of the node, and the detection rule relates to particular value combinations of the received message and of the state. 4 . The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the message is received upon a request of the node, and the detection rule relates to an expected response to the request. 5 . The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the message is recorded, the checking further takes place based on at least one present state of the node, and the detection rule relates to particular value combinations of the recorded message and of the present state of the node. 6 . The message as recited in claim 1 , wherein the message is received or recorded after the node has sent an earlier message in a certain state, and the detection rule relates to particular value combinations of the earlier message, of the received or recorded message, and of the certain state. 7 . The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the message is recorded, the checking further takes place based on at least one present state of the node, and the detection rule relates to particular value combinations of the recorded message and of the present state. 8 . A non-transitory machine-readable memory medium on which is stored a computer program for detecting anomalies in a computer network, the computer program, when executed on a computer, causing the computer to perform: receiving or recording, by a node of the computer network, a message transmitted over the computer network; based at least on the message, checking, by a detection mechanism of the node, whether an anomaly has occurred; and confirming or refuting an occurrence of the anomaly according to a predefined detection rule of the detection mechanism. 9 . A device, configured to detect anomalies in a computer network, the device configured to: receive or record, by a node of the computer network, a message transmitted over the computer network; based at least on the message, check, by a detection mechanism of the node, whether an anomaly has occurred; and confirm or refute an occurrence of the anomaly according to a predefined detection rule of the detection mechanism.
Event detection, e.g. attack signature detection · CPC title
Countermeasures against malicious traffic (countermeasures against attacks on cryptographic mechanisms H04L9/002) · CPC title
Traffic logging, e.g. anomaly detection · CPC title
for managing network security; network security policies in general (filtering policies H04L63/0227) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.