Dynamic bypass tunnel instantiation based on analytical health risk heatmap
US-2019182127-A1 · Jun 13, 2019 · US
US2019281078A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2019281078-A1 |
| Application number | US-201815915335-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Mar 8, 2018 |
| Priority date | Mar 8, 2018 |
| Publication date | Sep 12, 2019 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
In one embodiment, a server may receive both layer-2 topology information and layer-2 telemetry information from a plurality of layer-2 switches. The server may then apply behavioral learning to both the layer-2 topology information and the layer-2 telemetry information to detect layer-2 patterns that are indicative of one or more problematic layer-2 behaviors. As such, based on the behavioral learning, the server then creates predictive rules to be applied within layer-2 networks to predict the one or more problematic layer-2 behaviors. The predictive rules may then be used within a particular layer-2 network to cause i) prediction of one or more particular problematic layer-2 behaviors within the particular layer-2 network based on data from a plurality of switches within the particular layer-2 network, and ii) mitigation against the predicted one or more particular problematic layer-2 behaviors within the particular layer-2 network.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A method, comprising: receiving, at a server, layer-2 topology information from a plurality of layer-2 switches; receiving, at the server, layer-2 telemetry information from the plurality of layer-2 switches; applying, by the server, behavioral learning to both the layer-2 topology information and the layer-2 telemetry information to detect layer-2 patterns that are indicative of one or more problematic layer-2 behaviors; creating, by the server based on the behavioral learning, predictive rules to be applied within layer-2 networks to predict the one or more problematic layer-2 behaviors; and using, by the server, the predictive rules within a particular layer-2 network to cause i) prediction of one or more particular problematic layer-2 behaviors within the particular layer-2 network based on data from a plurality of switches within the particular layer-2 network, and ii) mitigation against the predicted one or more particular problematic layer-2 behaviors within the particular layer-2 network. 2 . The method as in claim 1 , wherein using the predictive rules comprises: receiving, by the server, the data from the plurality of switches within the particular layer-2 network; predicting, by the server, the one or more particular problematic layer-2 behaviors within the particular layer-2 network based on the data and the predictive rules; and mitigating, by the server, against the predicted one or more particular problematic layer-2 behaviors. 3 . The method as in claim 1 , wherein using the predictive rules comprises: sending the predictive rules to a second server for the particular layer-2 network, wherein the second server receives the data from the plurality of switches within the particular layer-2 network, predicts the one or more particular problematic layer-2 behaviors within the particular layer-2 network based on the data and the predictive rules, mitigates against the predicted one or more particular problematic layer-2 behaviors. 4 . The method as in claim 1 , wherein the mitigation against the predicted one or more particular problematic layer-2 behaviors comprises one or more autonomous server-initiated layer-2 network changes. 5 . The method as in claim 1 , wherein problematic layer-2 behaviors are selected from a group consisting of: media access control (MAC) move; MAC flapping; non-legitimate users; MAC flooding; MAC stale entry; MAC spoofing; and layer-2 storms. 6 . The method as in claim 1 , wherein the layer-2 topology information is selected from a group consisting of: spanning tree state; port state; and connected devices. 7 . The method as in claim 1 , wherein the layer-2 telemetry information is selected from a group consisting of: local media access control (MAC) table information; changes to MAC table information; and event information related to changes to MAC table information. 8 . The method as in claim 1 , wherein receiving one or both of the layer-2 topology information and layer-2 topology information is based on one or both of a push model or pull model between the server and the plurality of layer-2 switches. 9 . The method as in claim 1 , further comprising: feeding virtual local area network (VLAN) information for the plurality of layer-2 switches into the behavioral learning. 10 . The method as in claim 1 , further comprising: feeding address resolution protocol (ARP) information for the plurality of layer-2 switches into the behavioral learning. 11 . The method as in claim 1 , further comprising: processing, prior to applying behavioral learning, one or both of the layer-2 topology information and layer-2 topology information to convert raw data into meaningful attributes for the behavioral learning. 12 . The method as in claim 1 , wherein the plurality of layer-2 switches are from a plurality of different layer-2 networks. 13 . A tangible, non-transitory, computer-readable medium storing program instructions that cause a computer to execute a process comprising: receiving layer-2 topology information from a plurality of layer-2 switches; receiving layer-2 telemetry information from the plurality of layer-2 switches; applying behavioral learning to both the layer-2 topology information and the layer-2 telemetry information to detect layer-2 patterns that are indicative of one or more problematic layer-2 behaviors; creating, based on the behavioral learning, predictive rules to be applied within layer-2 networks to predict the one or more problematic layer-2 behaviors; and using the predictive rules within a particular layer-2 network to cause i) prediction of one or more particular problematic layer-2 behaviors within the particular layer-2 network based on data from a plurality of switches within the particular layer-2 network, and ii) mitigation against the predicted one or more particular problematic layer-2 behaviors within the particular layer-2 network. 14 . The computer-readable medium as in claim 13 , wherein using the predictive rules comprises: receiving the data from the plurality of switches within the particular layer-2 network; predicting the one or more particular problematic layer-2 behaviors within the particular layer-2 network based on the data and the predictive rules; and mitigating against the predicted one or more particular problematic layer-2 behaviors. 15 . The computer-readable medium as in claim 13 , wherein the process further comprises: processing, prior to applying behavioral learning, one or both of the layer-2 topology information and layer-2 topology information to convert raw data into meaningful attributes for the behavioral learning. 16 . The computer-readable medium as in claim 13 , wherein the mitigation against the predicted one or more particular problematic layer-2 behaviors comprises one or more autonomous server-initiated layer-2 network changes. 17 . The computer-readable medium as in claim 13 , wherein: the layer-2 topology information is selected from a group consisting of: spanning tree state; port state; and connected devices; and the layer-2 telemetry information is selected from a group consisting of: local media access control (MAC) table information; changes to MAC table information; and event information related to changes to MAC table information. 18 . The computer-readable medium as in claim 13 , wherein problematic layer-2 behaviors are selected from a group consisting of: media access control (MAC) move; MAC flapping; non-legitimate users; MAC flooding; MAC stale entry; MAC spoofing; and layer-2 storms. 19 . The computer-readable medium as in claim 13 , wherein receiving one or both of the layer-2 topology information and layer-2 topology information is based on one or both of a push model or pull model with the plurality of layer-2 switches. 20 . A method, comprising: sending, from a layer-2 switch, initial layer-2 topology information and initial layer-2 telemetry information to a server to cause the server to i) apply behavioral learning to both layer-2 topology information and layer-2 telemetry information from a plurality of layer-2 switches to detect layer-2 patterns that are indicative of one or more problematic layer-2 behaviors, and ii) create, based on the behavioral learning, predictive rules to be applied within layer-2 networks to predict the one or more problematic layer-2 behaviors; sending, from the layer-2 switch, subsequent layer-2 topology information and subsequent layer-2 telemetry information to the server t
Probabilistic graphical models, e.g. probabilistic networks · CPC title
Recurrent networks, e.g. Hopfield networks · CPC title
using network fault recovery (ring fault isolation or reconfiguration in loop networks without recovery actions by a network management system H04L12/437) · CPC title
for predicting network behaviour · CPC title
Denial of Service · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.