Core extraction assessment

US2019222007A1 · US · A1

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-2019222007-A1
Application numberUS-201916252233-A
CountryUS
Kind codeA1
Filing dateJan 18, 2019
Priority dateJan 18, 2018
Publication dateJul 18, 2019
Grant date

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Generating an assessment of the suitability of cables, ducts, tubes, pipes and/or other hollow-type of conduits to extraction of cores, conductors, insulation, etc. included therein while still buried in the ground or otherwise positioned out-of-sight so as to be unavailable for visual and/or physical inspection is contemplated. The assessment may be used to indicate a suitability of a cable buried in the ground of a hybrid fiber coaxial (HFC) cable plant to extraction of the type whereby a core of the cable may be extracted using hydraulics while still buried.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1 . A method for assessing suitability of a cable buried in the ground to extraction of the type whereby a core of the cable is extracted using hydraulics while most of the cable remains buried, the method comprising: electronically measuring signaling characteristics for signaling communicated through the cable while buried; and processing the signaling characteristics to generate an assessment sufficient for representing suitability of the cable to the hydraulic extraction of the core while buried. 2 . The method of claim 1 further comprising indicating with the assessment the cable being one of suitable and unsuitable for the hydraulic extraction depending on physical characteristics of the cable derived from the signaling characteristics. 3 . The method of claim 2 further comprising indicating the cable as suitable when the physical characteristics indicate an integrity of an outer shield surrounding the core being sufficient to maintain a hydraulic pressure above a threshold and indicating the cable as unsuitable when the integrity is insufficient to maintain the hydraulic pressure above the threshold. 4 . The method of claim 2 further comprising indicating the cable as suitable when the physical characteristics indicate an angularity measured between a first portion and a second portion of an outer shield surrounding the core exceeds a threshold and indicating the cable as unsuitable when the angularity is below the threshold. 5 . The method of claim 2 further comprising indicating the cable as suitable when the physical characteristics indicate a circularity continuously measured between a first portion and a second potion of an outer shield surrounding the core exceeds a threshold and indicating the cable as unsuitable when the circularity is below the threshold. 6 . The method of claim 1 further comprising indicating with the assessment the cable being suitable for the hydraulic extraction when the measured signaling characteristics indicate a radio frequency (RF) leakage is below a threshold and unsuitable for the hydraulic extraction when the RF leakage exceeds the threshold. 7 . The method of claim 1 further comprising indicating with the assessment the cable being suitable for the hydraulic extraction when the measured signaling characteristics indicate microreflections are below a threshold and unsuitable for the hydraulic extraction when the microreflections exceed the threshold. 8 . The method of claim 1 further comprising indicating with the assessment the cable being suitable for the hydraulic extraction when the measured signaling characteristics indicate harmonics are below a threshold and unsuitable for the hydraulic extraction when the harmonics exceed the threshold. 9 . The method of claim 1 further comprising indicating with the assessment the cable being suitable for the hydraulic extraction when the measured signaling characteristics indicate common path distortion (CPD) is below a threshold and unsuitable for the hydraulic extraction when the CPD exceeds the threshold. 10 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium having a plurality of instructions stored thereon and executable with a processor of a controller to facilitate assessing suitability of a communication line for core extraction, the plurality of instructions being sufficient for: measuring signaling characteristics of the communication line while signals are being communicated thereover; setting threshold values for the signaling characteristics, the threshold values relating the corresponding signaling characteristics to physical characteristics of the communication line affecting whether core extraction can be performed; and generating an assessment indicating the communication line to be suitable or unsuitable for the core extraction depending on a comparison of the signaling characteristics to the threshold values. 11 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10 further comprising the plurality of instructions being sufficient for: determining a hydraulic pressure needed for the core extraction; and setting the threshold values in proportion to the hydraulic pressure. 12 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 further comprising calculating the hydraulic pressure based on a diameter of the core and a length of the communication line. 13 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10 further comprising the plurality of instructions being sufficient for indicating with the assessment the communication line being suitable for the core extraction when the measured signaling characteristics indicate a radio frequency (RF) leakage is below a threshold and unsuitable for the hydraulic extraction when the RF leakage exceeds the threshold. 14 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10 further comprising the plurality of instructions being sufficient for indicating with the assessment the communication line being suitable for the core extraction when the measured signaling characteristics indicate microreflections are below a threshold and unsuitable for the hydraulic extraction when the microreflections exceed the threshold. 15 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10 further comprising the plurality of instructions being sufficient for indicating with the assessment the communication line being suitable for the core extraction when the measured signaling characteristics indicate harmonics are below a threshold and unsuitable for the hydraulic extraction when the harmonics exceed the threshold. 16 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 10 further comprising the plurality of instructions being sufficient for indicating with the assessment the communication line being suitable for the core extraction when the measured signaling characteristics indicate common path distortion (CPD) is below a threshold and unsuitable for the hydraulic extraction when the CPD exceeds the threshold. 17 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium having a plurality of instructions stored thereon and executable with a processor of a controller to facilitate assessing suitability of a coaxial cable for core extraction, the plurality of instructions being sufficient for: measuring signaling characteristics of the coaxial cable; determining a hydraulic pressure needed for the core extraction to hydraulically extract a core of the coaxial cable; and generating an assessment indicating the coaxial cable to be suitable or unsuitable for the core extraction depending on the signaling characteristics and the hydraulic pressure. 18 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 17 further comprising the plurality of instructions being sufficient for indicating with the assessment the coaxial cable being suitable for the core extraction when the signaling characteristics indicate of an outer shield of the coaxial cable being able to maintain a pressure above the hydraulic pressure and unsuitable for the core extraction when the outer shield is unable to maintain the pressure above the hydraulic pressure. 19 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 18 further comprising measuring the signaling characteristics to include leakage, harmonics, common path distortion (CPD) and microreflections. 20 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 17 further comprising the plurality of instructions being sufficient for determining the hydraulic pressure based on a material of a dielectric

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Installing in protective tubing by fluid drag during manufacturing · CPC title

  • using fluid, e.g. air · CPC title

  • H02G1/08Primary

    through tubing or conduit, e.g. rod or draw wire for pushing or pulling {(inserting electrical cables into tubes using wallbores E21B17/206; for optical cables G02B6/4401)} · CPC title

  • Wired transmission systems · CPC title

  • Hollow cables · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US2019222007A1 cover?
Generating an assessment of the suitability of cables, ducts, tubes, pipes and/or other hollow-type of conduits to extraction of cores, conductors, insulation, etc. included therein while still buried in the ground or otherwise positioned out-of-sight so as to be unavailable for visual and/or physical inspection is contemplated. The assessment may be used to indicate a suitability of a cable bu…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Cable Television Laboratories Inc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification H02G1/08. Mapped technology areas include Electricity.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Thu Jul 18 2019 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (A1). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).