Simulating end-to-end upgrade process in production environment
US-2018113728-A1 · Apr 26, 2018 · US
US2019026175A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2019026175-A1 |
| Application number | US-201715805162-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Nov 7, 2017 |
| Priority date | Jul 20, 2017 |
| Publication date | Jan 24, 2019 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Methods and apparatus to generate a shadow setup based on a cloud environment and upgrade the shadow setup to identify upgrade-related errors are disclosed. An example apparatus includes a topology deployment determiner to deploy a shadow setup corresponding to a replica version of a live cloud environment; an upgrade coordinator to upgrade one or more components of the shadow setup; and a reporter to generate a report corresponding to the upgrade.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . An apparatus comprising at least one microprocessor configured to execute computer program instructions stored in a non-transitory machine readable memory, the instructions causing the apparatus to: deploy a shadow setup corresponding to a replica of a live cloud environment; upgrade one or more components of the shadow setup; and generate a report corresponding to the upgrade. 2 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the instructions causing the apparatus to deploy the shadow setup causes the apparatus to scan the live cloud environment based on scanning rules to generate scanned data, the scanned data being used to define the shadow setup. 3 . The apparatus of claim 2 , wherein the instructions further cause the apparatus to generate a configuration file based on the scanned data and sampling criteria, wherein the shadow setup is deployed using the configuration file. 4 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further cause the apparatus to receive user input verifying the shadow setup prior to deploying the shadow setup. 5 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the instructions causing the apparatus to deploy the shadow setup fixes one or more errors encountered when deploying the shadow setup, the errors being fixed prior to the upgrade. 6 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the report includes data related to one or more errors encountered during the upgrade. 7 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further cause the apparatus to generate a user interface, the user interface allowing a user to upgrade the one or more components in the live cloud environment in a manner corresponding to the upgrade of the shadow setup. 8 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further cause the apparatus to prevent or hinder a user from initiating a live upgrade in the live cloud environment when an error occurs during the upgrade of the one or more components of the shadow setup. 9 . A method comprising: deploying, by executing an instruction using a processor, a shadow setup corresponding to a replica of a live cloud environment; upgrading, by executing an instruction using the processor, one or more components of the shadow setup; and generating, by executing an instruction using the processor, a report corresponding to the upgrade. 10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the deploying includes scanning the live cloud environment based on scanning rules to generate scanned data, the scanned data being used to define the shadow setup. 11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the deploying further includes generating a configuration file based on the scanned data and sampling criteria, the deploying of the shadow setup being based on the configuration file. 12 . The method of claim 9 , further including receiving user input to verify the shadow setup prior deploying the shadow setup. 13 . The method of claim 9 , further including, when the deploying of the shadow setup causes an error, fixing the error prior to the upgrade. 14 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the report includes data based on one or more errors encountered during the upgrade. 15 . The method of claim 9 , further including, when the report corresponds to a successful upgrade, receiving user input to initiate an upgrade of the one or more components in the live cloud environment in a manner corresponding to the upgrade of the shadow setup. 16 . The method of claim 9 , further including preventing or hindering a user from initiating a live upgrade in the live cloud environment when an error occurs during the upgrade of the one or more components of the shadow setup. 17 . A tangible computer readable storage medium comprising instructions which, when executed, cause a machine to at least: deploy a shadow setup corresponding to a replica of a live cloud environment; upgrade one or more components of the shadow setup; and generate a report corresponding to the upgrade. 18 . The computer readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the instructions cause the machine to deploy the shadow setup include instructions to scan the live cloud environment based on scanning rules to generate scanned data, the scanned data being used to define the shadow setup. 19 . The computer readable storage medium of claim 18 , wherein the instructions cause the machine to deploy the shadow setup include instructions to generate a configuration file based on the scanned data and sampling criteria, wherein the shadow setup is deployed using the configuration file. 20 . The computer readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the instructions cause the machine to receive user input to verify the shadow setup prior to deploying the shadow setup. 21 . The computer readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the instructions cause the machine to, when the deploying of the shadow setup causes an error, fix the error prior to the upgrade. 22 . The computer readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the report includes data based on one or more errors encountered during the upgrade. 23 . The computer readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the instructions cause the machine to, when the report corresponds to a successful upgrade, receive user input to initiate an upgrade of the one or more components in the live cloud environment in a manner corresponding to the upgrade of the shadow setup. 24 . The computer readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the instructions cause the machine to prevent or hinder a user from initiating a live upgrade in the live cloud environment when an error occurs during the upgrade of the one or more components of the shadow setup.
Virtual · CPC title
Failover techniques · CPC title
wherein the managed service relates to distributed or central networked applications · CPC title
involving the movement of software or configuration parameters (network booting or remote initial program loading [RIPL] G06F9/4416) · CPC title
Updates (security arrangements therefor G06F21/57) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.