Stop contingency planning during autonomous vehicle operation
US-2018348771-A1 · Dec 6, 2018 · US
US2018200745A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2018200745-A1 |
| Application number | US-201715409646-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Jan 19, 2017 |
| Priority date | Jan 19, 2017 |
| Publication date | Jul 19, 2018 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A system including a computer programmed to actuate a spray device on a first vehicle and to receive an image, from a second vehicle, of the actuated spray device. The computer determines whether a spray device fault exists based at least on the image of the actuated spray device, and transmits the spray device fault via a first vehicle communications network.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A system, comprising a computer, programmed to: actuate a spray device on first vehicle; receive an image, from a second vehicle, of the actuated spray device; determine whether a spray device fault exists based at least on the image; and transmit the spray device fault via a first vehicle communications network. 2 . The system of claim 1 , the computer further programmed to: navigate the first vehicle to a service facility in response to determining the spray device fault exists. 3 . The system of claim 1 , the computer further programmed to: receive an image, from the second vehicle, of the spray device prior to actuation; wherein the determination of whether the spray device fault exists is further based at least on the image of the spray device prior to actuation. 4 . The system of claim 1 , the computer further programmed to: determine whether an image from a camera on the first vehicle is below a predetermined quality threshold; and transmit an image request to the second vehicle in response to determining the image from the camera on the first vehicle is below the predetermined quality threshold. 5 . The system of claim 4 , the computer further programmed to: transmit a camera fault via the first vehicle communications network in response to determining that the image from the camera on the first vehicle is below the predetermined quality threshold and that no spray device fault exists. 6 . The system of claim 5 , the computer further programmed to: navigate the first vehicle to a service facility in response to determining the image from the camera on the first vehicle is below the predetermined quality threshold and that no spray device fault exists. 7 . The system of claim 1 , the computer further programmed to: transmit an image request to the second vehicle, the image request including a position of the first vehicle relative to the second vehicle. 8 . The system of claim 1 , the computer further programmed to: actuate a navigation sensor in response to determining the spray device fault exists. 9 . The system of claim 1 , the computer further programmed to: actuate a camera of the first vehicle to capture an image of the second vehicle; and transmit the image from the first vehicle to the second vehicle. 10 . The system of claim 9 , the computer further programmed to: actuate the camera in response to receiving an image request from the second vehicle. 11 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the image is an infrared image. 12 . A method comprising: actuating a spray device on first vehicle; receiving an image, from a second vehicle, of the actuated spray device; determining whether a spray device fault exists based at least on the image; and transmitting the spray device fault via a first vehicle communications network. 13 . The method of claim 12 , further comprising: navigating the first vehicle to a service facility in response to determining the spray device fault exists. 14 . The method of claim 12 , further comprising: receiving an image, from the second vehicle, of the spray device prior to actuation; wherein the determination of whether the spray device fault exists is further based at least on the image of the spray device prior to actuation. 15 . The method of claim 12 , further comprising: determining whether an image from a camera on the first vehicle is below a predetermined quality threshold; and transmitting an image request to the second vehicle in response to determining the image from the camera on the first vehicle is below the predetermined quality threshold. 16 . The method of claim 15 , further comprising: transmitting a camera fault via the first vehicle communications network in response to determining that the image from the camera on the first vehicle is below a predetermined quality threshold and that no spray device fault exists. 17 . The method of claim 16 , further comprising: navigating the first vehicle to a service facility in response to determining that the image from the camera on the first vehicle is below a predetermined quality threshold and that no spray device fault exists. 18 . The method of claim 12 , further comprising: transmitting an image request to the second vehicle, the image request including a position of the first vehicle relative to the second vehicle. 19 . The method of claim 12 , further comprising: actuating a navigation sensor in response to determining the spray device fault exists. 20 . The method of claim 12 , further comprising: actuating a camera of the first vehicle to capture an image of the second vehicle; and transmitting the image from the first vehicle to the second vehicle.
Data transmitted between vehicles · CPC title
Diagnosing or detecting failures; Failure detection models · CPC title
Input other than that of destination using image analysis, e.g. detection of road signs, lanes, buildings, real preceding vehicles using a camera · CPC title
Industrial image inspection · CPC title
Dynamic re-routing, e.g. recalculating the route when the user deviates from calculated route or after detecting real-time traffic data or accidents · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.