Methods and Software for Calculating Optimal Power Flow in an Electrical Power Grid and Utilizations of Same

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-2018158152-A1
Application number	US-201715658335-A
Country	US
Kind code	A1
Filing date	Jul 24, 2017
Priority date	Dec 5, 2016
Publication date	Jun 7, 2018
Grant date	—

Abstract

Methods of calculating optimal power flows (OPFs) in power transmission and distribution networks using equivalent-circuit formulations that allow the solutions to converge to corresponding global minima. In some aspects, network (circuit) elements are modeled using split circuits composed of real and imaginary parts. A variety of nonlinear OPF problem formulations are disclosed, including direct-solution formulations and iterative-solution formulations based on converting real and reactive power constraints to equivalent conductance/susceptance constraint. Also disclosed are a variety of techniques for solving the disclosed OPF problems, including new admittance-stepping homotopy techniques, among others. Software embodying disclosed methods is also described, as are example implementation scenarios.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1 . A method, comprising:
formulating, for an electrical power system, current and voltage conservation equations from which power flows, currents, and voltages can be derived, wherein the current and voltage conservation equations correspond to an equivalent circuit representation of the electrical power system that includes:
a real sub-circuit including all real-valued voltages and currents; and
an imaginary sub-circuit containing all imaginary-valued voltages and currents,
wherein:
the real sub-circuit and imaginary sub-circuit are coupled via controlled voltage and current sources; and
the generators are modeled by combinations of complex admittances and current or voltage sources of unknown value that represent their power delivery capabilities; and

running an optimization program for the power flow conservation equations so as to produce a minimum cost for operating the electrical power system based on the solution of control parameter values for the generator models in the system.

2 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the optimization program is formulated as an equivalent circuit problem.

3 . The method according to claim 2 , wherein the optimization program constraints are formulated as an equivalent circuit problem.

4 . The method according to claim 2 , wherein the equivalent circuit problem is solved using Homotopy and/or continuation methods.

5 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein one or more PV generators are modeled by a conductance and a susceptance.

6 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein one or more load models are represented by an equivalent circuit consisting of a conductance, susceptance and current source (BIG) or circuit equivalent.

7 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the nonlinear constraints are linearized such that the optimization program can be solved using sequential quadratic programming (SQP).

8 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the original optimization program nonlinearities are first relaxed to obtain the lower bound on the global optimal solution, which is then used as the initial starting point for solution of the original nonlinear optimization program.

9 . The method according to claim 8 , wherein the process is repeated iteratively wherein the results from each iteration are used to tighten the constraints for the relaxed optimization program until the resulting lower bound on the global optimal solution is within a certain tolerance with regard to its match to the solution of the original nonlinear optimization program.

10 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the equivalent circuit formulation allows the implementation of Unit commitment analysis within the optimization problem.

11 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the equivalent circuit formulation allows the minimization of real power loses within the optimization problem.

12 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the equivalent circuit formulation allows the minimization of reactive power loses within the optimization problem.

13 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the equivalent circuit formulation allows the optimization of reactive power reserves within the formulated program.

14 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the equivalent circuit formulation allows the optimization of adjustable branch impedances within the formulated program.

15 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the equivalent circuit formulation allows the optimization of adjustable bus shunts within the formulated program.

16 . The method according to claim 1 , further including controlling the electrical power system based on the minimum cost.

17 . The method according to claim 16 , wherein the controlling of the electrical power system includes:
generating one or more device control signals based on the minimum cost, wherein each of the one or more device control signals are configured to respectively control one or more corresponding devices of the electrical power system that affect cost of operating the electrical power system; and causing the one or more device control signals to be transmitted to corresponding respective one(s) of the device(s).

18 . A machine-readable storage medium containing machine-executable instructions configured to cause one or more processors to perform operations comprising:
formulating, for an electrical power system, current and voltage conservation equations from which power flows, currents, and voltages can be derived, wherein the current and voltage conservation equations correspond to an equivalent circuit representation of the electrical power system that includes:
a real sub-circuit including all real-valued voltages and currents; and
an imaginary sub-circuit containing all imaginary-valued voltages and currents,
wherein:
the real sub-circuit and imaginary sub-circuit are coupled via controlled voltage and current sources; and
the generators are modeled by combinations of complex admittances and current or voltage sources of unknown value that represent their power delivery capabilities; and

running an optimization program for the power flow conservation equations so as to produce a minimum cost for operating the electrical power system based on the solution of control parameter values for the generator models in the system.

19 . The machine-readable storage medium according to claim 18 , wherein the optimization program is formulated as an equivalent circuit problem.

20 . The machine-readable storage medium according to claim 19 , wherein the optimization program constraints are formulated as an equivalent circuit problem.

21 . The machine-readable storage medium according to claim 19 , wherein the equivalent circuit problem is solved using Homotopy and/or continuation methods.

22 . The machine-readable storage medium according to claim 18 , wherein one or more PV generators are modeled by a conductance and a susceptance.

23 . The machine-readable storage medium according to claim 18 , wherein one or more load models are represented by an equivalent circuit consisting of a conductance, susceptance and current source (BIG) or circuit equivalent.

24 . The machine-readable storage medium according to claim 18 , wherein the nonlinear constraints are linearized such that the optimization program can be solved using sequential quadratic programming (SQP).

25 . The machine-readable storage medium according to claim 18 , wherein the original optimization program nonlinearities are first relaxed to obtain the lower bound on the global optimal solution, which is then used as the initial starting point for solution of the original nonlinear optimization program.

26 . The machine-readable storage medium according to claim 25 , wherein the process is repeated iteratively wherein the results from each iteration are used to tighten the constraints for the relaxed optimization program until the resulting lower bound on the global optimal solution is within a certain tolerance with regard to its match to the solution of the original nonlinear optimization program.

27 . The machine-readable storage medium according to claim 18 , wherein the equivalent circuit formulation allows the implementation of Unit commitment analysis within the optimization problem.

28 . The machine-readable storage medium acc

Assignees

• Univ Carnegie Mellon

Inventors

• Jereminov Marko
• Pileggi Lawrence
• Pandey Amritanshu

Classifications

• H02J2103/30

  Simulating, planning, modelling, reliability check or computer assisted design [CAD] of electric power networks · CPC title

• G05B13/048

  using a predictor · CPC title

• G06Q50/06 Primary

  Energy or water supply · CPC title

• H02J3/16

  by adjustment of reactive power · CPC title

• H02J2003/007

  Electricity · mapped topic