System and method for software test analysis
US-2024419581-A1 · Dec 19, 2024 · US
US2018113799A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2018113799-A1 |
| Application number | US-201615332840-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Oct 24, 2016 |
| Priority date | Oct 24, 2016 |
| Publication date | Apr 26, 2018 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
In one embodiment, control-flow information comprising an indication of function execution order for an application may be generated using source code for the application. Function information for the application may be identified, the function information comprising an indication of an execution context for a function of the application. A model graph to test the application may be generated based on the control-flow information and the function information.
Opening claim text (preview).
1 . A method comprising: generating, using source code for an application, control-flow information comprising an indication of function execution order for the application; identifying function information for the application, the function information comprising an indication of an execution context for a function of the application; and generating, based on the control-flow information and the function information, a model graph to test the application. 2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising testing the application using the model graph. 3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein testing the application using the model graph comprises: generating, based on the model graph, an input to the function; executing the function using the generated input; and determining, based on the model graph, whether an output of the function is valid. 4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the control-flow information is generated by parsing the source code using a program slicing technique. 5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the function information comprises an identification of a parent function of the function. 6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the function information comprises function validation information, the function validation information comprising an identification of valid output of the function. 7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the function information comprises function input information, the function input information comprising an identification of valid input to the function. 8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the function information is obtained from a user. 9 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising generating additional function information based on an evaluation of the function information obtained from the user. 10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the function information is identified based on an evaluation of a test case for the application. 11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the function information is identified by parsing the source code for the application. 12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the function information is represented using a metalanguage. 13 . A system comprising: a processor device; a memory element; and an application testing agent stored in the memory element, the application testing agent comprising one or more instructions executable by the processor device, the one or more instructions configured to: generate, using source code for an application, control-flow information comprising an indication of function execution order for the application; identify function information for the application, the function information comprising an indication of an execution context for a function of the application; generate, based on the control-flow information and the function information, a model graph to test the application; and test the application using the model graph. 14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the one or more instructions configured to test the application using the model graph are further configured to: generate, based on the model graph, an input to the function; execute the function using the generated input; and determine, based on the model graph, whether an output of the function is valid. 15 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the one or more instructions are further configured to generate the control-flow information by parsing the source code using a program slicing technique. 16 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the one or more instructions are further configured to obtain the function information from a user. 17 . The system of claim 16 , wherein the one or more instructions are further configured to generate additional function information based on an evaluation of the function information obtained from the user. 18 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the one or more instructions are further configured to identify the function information based on an evaluation of a test case for the application. 19 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the one or more instructions are further configured to identify the function information by parsing the source code for the application. 20 . A non-transitory computer readable medium having program instructions stored thereon that are executable to cause a computer system to perform operations comprising: generating, using source code for an application, control-flow information comprising an indication of function execution order for the application; identifying function information for the application, the function information comprising an indication of an execution context for a function of the application; and generating, based on the control-flow information and the function information, a model graph to test the application.
for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites · CPC title
for test design, e.g. generating new test cases · CPC title
Physics · mapped topic
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.