Process-metrology reproducibility bands for lithographic photomasks

US2018101630A1 · US · A1

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-2018101630-A1
Application numberUS-201715838423-A
CountryUS
Kind codeA1
Filing dateDec 12, 2017
Priority dateMar 26, 2015
Publication dateApr 12, 2018
Grant date

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

A photomask lithography simulation model is created for making a semiconductor chip. Poor metrology is filtered and removed from a contour-specific metrology dataset to improve performance of the photomask. Filtering is performed by the application of a weighting scheme.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1 . A method comprising: determining an average contour based on a filtered subset of a plurality of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) metrology datasets corresponding to a target contour; computing an image parameter for a set of gauges for the target contour; correlating the image parameter and a process-metrology reproducibility (PMR) band to generate a parameter to PMR band correlation; determining a sampling count for the target contour based at least in part on the parameter to PMR band correlation; computing an image log-scope (ILS) value for each gauge in the set of gauges; generating a weight function for the target contour based at least in part on a PMR variance and the ILS value; creating a lithography simulation model based on the weight function; and calibrating a photoresist compact model according to the lithography simulation model; wherein: the filtered subset excludes unphysical excursions of the target contour. 2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: generating photomask shapes with the photoresist compact model; and creating an integrated circuit based on the photomask shapes. 3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: assigning an increased relative weight for a selected contour; wherein the selected contour is selected from a set of target contours based on specified outer limits of the PMR band and the parameter to PMR band correlation. 4 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising; extracting the target contour from a set of SEM images. 5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: identifying, based on a fragmentation setting, the set of gauges for the target contour. 6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein: the step of correlating the image parameter and a PMR band includes placing a set of measurement markers according to one of a first fragmentation setting where markers are placed for a two-dimensional target contour, and a second fragmentation setting where markers are placed for a one-dimensional target contour; and the first fragmentation setting applies a more dense set of markers than the second fragmentation setting. 7 . A computer program product comprising a computer readable storage medium having program instructions embodied therewith, the program instructions readable by a computer to cause the computer to: determine an average contour based on a filtered subset of a plurality of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) metrology datasets corresponding to a target contour; compute an image parameter for a set of gauges for the target contour; correlate the image parameter and a process-metrology reproducibility (PMR) band to generate a parameter to PMR band correlation; determine a sampling count for the target contour based at least in part on the parameter to PMR band correlation; compute an image log-scope (ILS) value for each gauge in the set of gauges; generate a weight function for the target contour based at least in part on a PMR variance and the ILS value; create a lithography simulation model based on the weight function; and calibrate a photoresist compact model according to the lithography simulation model; wherein: the filtered subset excludes unphysical excursions of the target contour. 8 . The computer program product of claim 7 , further comprising: program instructions readable by a computer to cause the computer to generate photomask shapes with the photoresist compact model; and program instructions readable by a computer to cause the computer to create an integrated circuit based on the photomask shapes. 9 . The computer program product of claim 7 , further comprising: program instructions readable by a computer to cause the computer to assign an increased relative weight for a selected contour; wherein: the selected contour is selected from a set of target contours based on specified outer limits of the PMR band and the parameter to PMR band correlation. 10 . The computer program product of claim 7 , further comprising: program instructions readable by a computer to cause the computer to extract the target contour from a set of SEM images. 11 . The computer program product of claim 7 , further comprising: program instructions readable by a computer to cause the computer to identify the set of gauges for the target contour. 12 . The computer program product of claim 7 , wherein: the program instructions readable by a computer to cause the computer to correlate the image parameter and the PMR band includes causing the computer to place a set of measurement markers according to one of a first fragmentation setting where markers are placed for a two-dimensional target contour and a second fragmentation setting where markers are placed for a one-dimensional target contour; and the first fragmentation setting applies a more dense set of markers than the second fragmentation setting. 13 . A computer system comprising: a processor set; and a computer readable storage medium; wherein: the processor set is structured, located, connected, and/or programmed to run program instructions stored on the computer readable storage medium; and the program instructions include: a first set of program instructions programmed to determine an average contour based on a filtered subset of a plurality of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) metrology datasets corresponding to a target contour; a second set of program instructions programmed to compute an image parameter for a set of gauges for the target contour; a third set of program instructions programmed to correlate the image parameter and a process-metrology reproducibility (PMR) band to generate a parameter to PMR band correlation; a fourth set of program instructions programmed to determine a sampling count for the target contour based at least in part on the parameter to PMR band correlation; a fifth set of program instructions programmed to compute an image log-scope (ILS) value for each gauge in the set of gauges; a sixth set of program instructions programmed to generate a weight function for the target contour based at least in part on a PMR variance and the ILS value; a seventh set of program instructions programmed to create a lithography simulation model based on the weight function; and an eighth set of program instructions programmed to calibrate a photoresist compact model according to the lithography simulation model; wherein: the filtered subset excludes unphysical excursions of the target contour. 14 . The computer system of claim 13 , further comprising: a ninth set of program instructions programmed to generate photomask shapes with the photoresist compact model; and a tenth set of program instructions programmed to create an integrated circuit based on the photomask shapes. 15 . The computer system of claim 13 , further comprising: a ninth-set of program instructions programmed to assign an increased relative weight for a selected contour; wherein: the selected contour is selected from a set of target contours based on specified outer limits of the PMR band and the parameter to PMR band correlation. 16 . The computer system of claim 13 , further comprising: a ninth set of program instructions programmed to extract the target contour from a set of SEM images. 17 . The computer system of claim 13 , further comprising: a twelfth set of program instructions programmed to identify the set of gauges for the target contour. 18 . The computer system of claim 13 , wherein: the third set of

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Dimensions, e.g. line width, critical dimension [CD], profile, sidewall angle or edge roughness · CPC title

  • G06F30/20Primary

    Design optimisation, verification or simulation (optimisation, verification or simulation of circuit designs G06F30/30) · CPC title

  • Monitoring the printed patterns · CPC title

  • Design verification or optimisation, e.g. using design rule check [DRC], layout versus schematics [LVS] or finite element methods [FEM] (optical proximity correction [OPC] design processes G03F1/36) · CPC title

  • Physics · mapped topic

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US2018101630A1 cover?
A photomask lithography simulation model is created for making a semiconductor chip. Poor metrology is filtered and removed from a contour-specific metrology dataset to improve performance of the photomask. Filtering is performed by the application of a weighting scheme.
Who is the assignee on this patent?
IBM
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06F30/20. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Thu Apr 12 2018 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (A1). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).