Contextually-aware scheduling exceptions

US2017316386A1 · US · A1

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-2017316386-A1
Application numberUS-201615142818-A
CountryUS
Kind codeA1
Filing dateApr 29, 2016
Priority dateApr 29, 2016
Publication dateNov 2, 2017
Grant date

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Techniques described herein provide mechanisms for generating contextually-aware scheduling exceptions. In some configurations, when a scheduling conflict is detected, the techniques disclosed herein can utilize contextual data from a number of resources to determine if a scheduling exception can be made. The contextual data can include preferences, such as preferences of a service provider or a customer, that define criteria and/or goals. The techniques disclosed herein prioritize customers based on the contextual data and provide different scheduling options for customers and other entities based on a priority associated with individual customers. When there is a conflict between two or more calendar events, a scheduling exception can be made for some customers and a scheduling conflict can be made for other customers depending on one or more priorities associated with the customers.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1 . A computer-implemented method comprising: receiving, at a computing device, scheduling data defining a first calendar event associated with a first customer of a plurality of customers; receiving, at the computing device, scheduling data defining a second calendar event associated with a second customer of the plurality of customers; generating priority data indicating a priority of individual customers of the plurality of customers, wherein the priority is based, at least in part, on an analysis of contextual data including work history data, wherein the priority of the individual customers is based, at least in part, on a degree of alignment of attributes of the work history data and one or more goals defined in preference data; generating one or more values indicating a severity of a conflict based, at least in part, on the contextual data, including the priority data; determining if the one or more values indicating the severity of the conflict meet one or more criteria; and generating data indicating an exception to the conflict if the one or more values do not meet the one or more criteria. 2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more values indicating the severity of the conflict is based, at least in part, on a first severity level associated with the first calendar event, wherein the first severity level is reduced if a priority of the first customer is greater than a priority of the second customer. 3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more values indicating the severity of the conflict is based, at least in part, on a second severity level associated with the second calendar event, wherein the second severity level is increased if the priority of the first customer is greater than the priority of the second customer. 4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the data indicating the exception comprises generating a notification indicating the one or more values indicating the severity of the conflict. 5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the data indicating the exception to the conflict, comprises: communicating a first notification indicating a confirmation of the first calendar event if a priority of the first customer is greater than a priority of the second customer; and communicating a second notification indicating a modification of the second calendar event or a rejection of the second calendar event. 6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving a request for scheduling data from a computing device associated with second customer; communicating scheduling data indicating a block of unavailability near or at a start time of the first calendar event to the computing device associated with second customer, if a priority of the first customer is greater than a priority of the second customer; and communicating scheduling data indicating an availability of a timeslot near or at the start time of the first calendar event to the computing device associated with second customer, if a priority of the second customer is greater than a priority of the first customer. 7 . The method of claim 1 , further comprises generating calendar data defining one or more calendar events that blocks time around the first calendar event if a priority of the first customer is greater than a priority of the second customer. 8 . A system, comprising: a processor; and a memory in communication with the processor, the memory having computer-readable instructions stored thereupon that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform a method comprising receiving scheduling data defining a first calendar event associated with a first customer of a plurality of customers; receiving scheduling data defining a second calendar event associated with a second customer of the plurality of customers; generating priority data indicating a priority of individual customers of the plurality of customers, wherein the priority is based, at least in part, on an analysis of contextual data including work history data, wherein the priority of the individual customers is based, at least in part, on a degree of alignment of attributes of the work history data and one or more goals defined in preference data; generating one or more values indicating a severity of a conflict based, at least in part, on the contextual data, including the priority data; determining if the one or more values indicating the severity of the conflict meet one or more criteria; and generating data indicating an exception to the conflict if the one or more values do not meet the one or more criteria. 9 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the one or more values indicating the severity of the conflict is based, at least in part, on a first severity level associated with the first calendar event, wherein the first severity level is reduced if a priority of the first customer is greater than a priority of the second customer. 10 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the one or more values indicating the severity of the conflict is based, at least in part, on a second severity level associated with the second calendar event, wherein the second severity level is increased if the priority of the first customer is greater than the priority of the second customer. 11 . The system of claim 8 , wherein generating the data indicating the exception comprises generating a notification indicating the one or more values indicating the severity of the conflict. 12 . The system of claim 8 , wherein generating the data indicating the exception to the conflict, comprises: communicating a first notification indicating a confirmation of the first calendar event if a priority of the first customer is greater than a priority of the second customer; and communicating a second notification indicating a modification of the second calendar event or a rejection of the second calendar event. 13 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the method further comprising: receiving a request for scheduling data, the request received from a computing device associated with second customer; communicating scheduling data indicating a block of unavailability near or at a start time of the first calendar event to the computing device associated with second customer, if a priority of the first customer is greater than a priority of the second customer; and communicating scheduling data indicating an availability of a timeslot near or at the start time of the first calendar event to the computing device associated with second customer, if a priority of the second customer is greater than a priority of the first customer. 14 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the instructions cause the processor to perform the method comprising generating calendar data defining one or more calendar events that blocks time around the first calendar event if a priority of the first customer is greater than a priority of the second customer. 15 . One or more computer-readable storage media storing instructions that, when executed by one or more processors of a computing device, perform method comprising: receiving scheduling data defining a first calendar event associated with a first customer of a plurality of customers; receiving scheduling data defining a second calendar event associated with a second customer of the plurality of customers; generating priority data indicating a priority of an individual customer of the plurality of customers, wherein the priority is based, at least in part, on an analysis of contextual data, wherein the priority of the individual customers is based, at least in part, on a degree o

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Recording time for administrative or management purposes · CPC title

  • Calendar-based scheduling for persons or groups · CPC title

  • Physics · mapped topic

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US2017316386A1 cover?
Techniques described herein provide mechanisms for generating contextually-aware scheduling exceptions. In some configurations, when a scheduling conflict is detected, the techniques disclosed herein can utilize contextual data from a number of resources to determine if a scheduling exception can be made. The contextual data can include preferences, such as preferences of a service provider or …
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Microsoft Technology Licensing Llc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06Q10/1091. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Thu Nov 02 2017 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (A1). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 1 related publication on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).