State of charge battery monitoring
US-2016114696-A1 · Apr 28, 2016 · US
US2017246963A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2017246963-A1 |
| Application number | US-201615054686-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Feb 26, 2016 |
| Priority date | Feb 26, 2016 |
| Publication date | Aug 31, 2017 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A vehicle includes a battery, and a controller programmed to charge and discharge the battery based on a health indicator output by a model that describes changes in internal resistance of the battery over time identified from (i) a plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles and (ii) changes in internal resistance of the battery that are derived from a state of charge, temperature, and current associated with the battery.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A vehicle comprising: a battery; and a controller programmed to charge and discharge the battery based on a health indicator output by a model that describes changes in internal resistance of the battery over time identified from (i) a plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles and (ii) changes in internal resistance of the battery that are derived from a state of charge, temperature, and current associated with the battery. 2 . The vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the health indicator is indicative of a percentage of life remaining, a usage time remaining until end-of-life, or a usage time to-date. 3 . The vehicle of claim 2 , wherein the model defines the end-of-life. 4 . The vehicle of claim 2 , wherein the percentage of life remaining and the usage time remaining are defined using the usage time to-date, and wherein the usage time to-date is defined from an inverse of the model and the change in internal resistance. 5 . The vehicle of claim 1 , wherein one of the plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles is defined by changes in current magnitude and state-of-charge (SOC) that are greater than another one of the plurality. 6 . The vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the model describes changes in internal resistance identified from a best-fit curve of the plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles and wherein the best-fit curve is defined from a regression analysis. 7 . The vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the model describes changes in internal resistance identified from one of the plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles. 8 . A vehicle power system controller comprising: input channels configured to receive signals representing a plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles and changes in internal resistance of a battery that are derived from a state of charge, temperature, and current associated with the battery; output channels configured to output a health indicator; and control logic configured to generate the health indicator via a model that takes as input the signals. 9 . The controller of claim 8 , wherein the health indicator is indicative of a percentage of life remaining, a usage time remaining until end-of-life, or a usage time to-date. 10 . The controller of claim 9 , wherein the model defines the end-of-life. 11 . The controller of claim 9 , wherein the percentage of life remaining and the usage time remaining are defined using the usage time to-date, and wherein the usage time to-date is defined from an inverse of the model and the change in internal resistance. 12 . The controller of claim 8 , wherein one of the plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles is defined by changes in current magnitude and state-of-charge (SOC) that are greater than another one of the plurality. 13 . The controller of claim 8 , wherein the model describes changes in internal resistance identified from a best-fit curve of the plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles and wherein the best-fit curve is defined from a regression analysis. 14 . The controller of claim 8 , wherein the model describes changes in internal resistance identified from one of the plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles. 15 . A method comprising: charging and discharging a battery by a controller according to a health indicator output by a model that describes changes in internal resistance of the battery over time identified from (i) a plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles and (ii) changes in internal resistance of the battery that are derived from a state of charge, temperature, and current associated with the battery. 16 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the health indicator is indicative of a percentage of life remaining, a usage time remaining until end-of-life, or a usage time to-date. 17 . The method of claim 16 , wherein the model defines the end-of-life. 18 . The method of claim 16 , wherein the percentage of life remaining and the usage time remaining are defined using the usage time to-date, and wherein the usage time to-date is defined from an inverse of the model and the change in internal resistance. 19 . The method of claim 15 , wherein one of the plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles is defined by changes in current magnitude and state-of-charge (SOC) that are greater than another one of the plurality. 20 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the model describes changes in internal resistance identified from a best-fit curve of the plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles and wherein the best-fit curve is defined from a regression analysis.
Methods for charging or discharging (circuits for charging H02J7/00) · CPC title
Batteries in motive systems, e.g. vehicle, ship, plane · CPC title
Current · CPC title
involving identification of vehicles or their battery types · CPC title
responding to battery ageing, e.g. to the number of charging cycles or the state of health [SoH] · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.