Systems and methods for battery state-of-health monitoring

US2017246963A1 · US · A1

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-2017246963-A1
Application numberUS-201615054686-A
CountryUS
Kind codeA1
Filing dateFeb 26, 2016
Priority dateFeb 26, 2016
Publication dateAug 31, 2017
Grant date

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

A vehicle includes a battery, and a controller programmed to charge and discharge the battery based on a health indicator output by a model that describes changes in internal resistance of the battery over time identified from (i) a plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles and (ii) changes in internal resistance of the battery that are derived from a state of charge, temperature, and current associated with the battery.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1 . A vehicle comprising: a battery; and a controller programmed to charge and discharge the battery based on a health indicator output by a model that describes changes in internal resistance of the battery over time identified from (i) a plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles and (ii) changes in internal resistance of the battery that are derived from a state of charge, temperature, and current associated with the battery. 2 . The vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the health indicator is indicative of a percentage of life remaining, a usage time remaining until end-of-life, or a usage time to-date. 3 . The vehicle of claim 2 , wherein the model defines the end-of-life. 4 . The vehicle of claim 2 , wherein the percentage of life remaining and the usage time remaining are defined using the usage time to-date, and wherein the usage time to-date is defined from an inverse of the model and the change in internal resistance. 5 . The vehicle of claim 1 , wherein one of the plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles is defined by changes in current magnitude and state-of-charge (SOC) that are greater than another one of the plurality. 6 . The vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the model describes changes in internal resistance identified from a best-fit curve of the plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles and wherein the best-fit curve is defined from a regression analysis. 7 . The vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the model describes changes in internal resistance identified from one of the plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles. 8 . A vehicle power system controller comprising: input channels configured to receive signals representing a plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles and changes in internal resistance of a battery that are derived from a state of charge, temperature, and current associated with the battery; output channels configured to output a health indicator; and control logic configured to generate the health indicator via a model that takes as input the signals. 9 . The controller of claim 8 , wherein the health indicator is indicative of a percentage of life remaining, a usage time remaining until end-of-life, or a usage time to-date. 10 . The controller of claim 9 , wherein the model defines the end-of-life. 11 . The controller of claim 9 , wherein the percentage of life remaining and the usage time remaining are defined using the usage time to-date, and wherein the usage time to-date is defined from an inverse of the model and the change in internal resistance. 12 . The controller of claim 8 , wherein one of the plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles is defined by changes in current magnitude and state-of-charge (SOC) that are greater than another one of the plurality. 13 . The controller of claim 8 , wherein the model describes changes in internal resistance identified from a best-fit curve of the plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles and wherein the best-fit curve is defined from a regression analysis. 14 . The controller of claim 8 , wherein the model describes changes in internal resistance identified from one of the plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles. 15 . A method comprising: charging and discharging a battery by a controller according to a health indicator output by a model that describes changes in internal resistance of the battery over time identified from (i) a plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles and (ii) changes in internal resistance of the battery that are derived from a state of charge, temperature, and current associated with the battery. 16 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the health indicator is indicative of a percentage of life remaining, a usage time remaining until end-of-life, or a usage time to-date. 17 . The method of claim 16 , wherein the model defines the end-of-life. 18 . The method of claim 16 , wherein the percentage of life remaining and the usage time remaining are defined using the usage time to-date, and wherein the usage time to-date is defined from an inverse of the model and the change in internal resistance. 19 . The method of claim 15 , wherein one of the plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles is defined by changes in current magnitude and state-of-charge (SOC) that are greater than another one of the plurality. 20 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the model describes changes in internal resistance identified from a best-fit curve of the plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles and wherein the best-fit curve is defined from a regression analysis.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Methods for charging or discharging (circuits for charging H02J7/00) · CPC title

  • Batteries in motive systems, e.g. vehicle, ship, plane · CPC title

  • Current · CPC title

  • involving identification of vehicles or their battery types · CPC title

  • B60L58/16Primary

    responding to battery ageing, e.g. to the number of charging cycles or the state of health [SoH] · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US2017246963A1 cover?
A vehicle includes a battery, and a controller programmed to charge and discharge the battery based on a health indicator output by a model that describes changes in internal resistance of the battery over time identified from (i) a plurality of different representative battery usage aggressiveness drive cycles and (ii) changes in internal resistance of the battery that are derived from a state…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Ford Global Tech Llc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification B60L58/16. Mapped technology areas include Operations & Transport.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Thu Aug 31 2017 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (A1). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 2 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).