Ontology-Crowd-Relevance Deep Response Generation
US-2016342685-A1 · Nov 24, 2016 · US
US2017193092A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2017193092-A1 |
| Application number | US-201615159986-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | May 20, 2016 |
| Priority date | Jan 5, 2016 |
| Publication date | Jul 6, 2017 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Electronic natural language processing in a natural language processing (NLP) system, such as a Question-Answering (QA) system. A receives electronic text input, in question form, and determines a readability level indicator in the question. The readability level indicator includes at least a grammatical error, a slang term, and a misspelling type. The computer determines a readability level for the electronic text input based on the readability level indicator, and retrieves candidate answers based on the readability level.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A method for electronic natural language processing in an electronic natural language processing (NLP) system, comprising: receiving an electronic text input; determining a readability level indicator of the electronic text input, wherein the readability level indicator comprises at least one of a grammatical error, a slang term, and a misspelling type in the electronic text input; and determining a readability level of the electronic text input based on the readability level indicator. 2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving the electronic text input from an electronic input source in response to an input from a user. 3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: identifying the electronic text input as a question. 4 . The method of claim 3 , further comprising: generating a plurality of candidate answers for the question; and selecting a set of candidate answers from among the plurality of candidate answers based on matching readability levels of the set of candidate answers to the readability level of the question. 5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: parsing the electronic text input using a full parsing process. 6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: comparing the readability indicators of the electronic text input with readability indicators of one or more questions in a corpus of questions, wherein determining the readability level for the electronic text input is based on readability levels of the one or more questions. 7 . The method of claim 6 , further comprising: training a natural language processing model based on the results of the comparison. 8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying at least one of a slang term and a misspelling in the electronic text input comprises identifying, in the electronic text input, one or more of: an abbreviation of a word corresponding to an acronym associated with the word in a collection of text messaging acronyms; and a misspelling of the word, wherein the misspelling corresponds to a phonetic reading of the word.
using natural language analysis · CPC title
Recognition of textual entities · CPC title
Parsing · CPC title
Grammatical analysis; Style critique · CPC title
Processing or translation of natural language (natural language analysis G06F40/20; semantic analysis G06F40/30) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.