Methods for producing polypeptides in enzyme-deficient mutants of fusarium venentatum

US2017145462A1 · US · A1

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-2017145462-A1
Application numberUS-201715418280-A
CountryUS
Kind codeA1
Filing dateJan 27, 2017
Priority dateSep 30, 2008
Publication dateMay 25, 2017
Grant date

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

The present invention relates to methods of producing a polypeptide, comprising: (a) cultivating a mutant of a parent Fusarium venenatum strain in a medium for the production of the polypeptide, wherein the mutant strain comprises a polynucleotide encoding the polypeptide and one or more (several) genes selected from the group consisting of pyrG, amyA, and alpA, wherein the one or more (several) genes are modified rendering the mutant strain deficient in the production of one or more (several) enzymes selected from the group consisting of orotidine-5′-monophosphate decarboxylase, alpha-amylase, and alkaline protease, respectively, compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions; and (b) recovering the polypeptide from the cultivation medium. The present invention also relates to enzyme-deficient mutants of Fusarium venenatum strains and methods for producing such mutants.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

1 - 29 . (canceled). 30 . A mutant of a parent Fusarium venenatum strain, comprising a polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide and pyrG and alpA genes, wherein both of the pyrG and alpA genes are modified rendering the mutant strain deficient in the production of orotine-5′-monophosphate decarboxylase and alkaline protease compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 31 . The mutant strain of claim 30 , which produces at least 25% less of the orotine-5′-monophosphate decarboxylase and alkaline protease compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 32 . The mutant strain of claim 30 , which is completely deficient in the production of the orotine-5′-monophosphate decarboxylase and alkaline protease compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 33 . The mutant strain of claim 30 , which further comprises an amyA gene, wherein the amyA gene is modified rendering the mutant strain deficient in the production of an alpha-amylase compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 34 . The mutant strain of claim 33 , which produces at least 25% less of the alpha-amylase compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 35 . The mutant strain of claim 33 , which is completely deficient in the production of the alpha-amylase compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 36 . The mutant strain of claim 30 , which further comprises one or both of the genes tri5 and dps1, wherein the one or both of the genes are modified rendering the mutant strain deficient in the production of one or both of trichodiene synthase and cyclohexadepsipeptide synthetase, respectively, compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 37 . The mutant strain of claim 36 , which produces at least 25% less of the one or both of the trichodiene synthase and cyclohexadepsipeptide synthetase compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 38 . The mutant strain of claim 36 , which is completely deficient in the production of the one or both of the trichodiene synthase and cyclohexadepsipeptide synthetase compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 39 . The mutant strain of claim 30 , wherein the polypeptide is native or foreign to the Fusarium venenatum strain. 40 . A method for obtaining the mutant of a parent Fusarium venenatum strain of claim 30 , comprising: (a) modifying pyrG and alpA genes in the parent Fusarium venenatum strain; and (b) identifying a mutant strain from step (a) wherein both of the pyrG and alpA genes are modified rendering the mutant strain deficient in the production of orotine-5′-monophosphate decarboxylase and alkaline protease compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 41 . The method of claim 40 , wherein the mutant strain produces at least 25% less of the orotine-5′-monophosphate decarboxylase and alkaline protease compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 42 . The method of claim 40 , wherein the mutant is completely deficient in the production of the orotine-5′-monophosphate decarboxylase and alkaline protease compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 43 . The method of claim 40 , wherein the mutant further comprises an amyA gene, and wherein the amyA gene is modified rendering the mutant strain deficient in the production of an alpha-amylase compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 44 . The method of claim 43 , wherein the mutant strain produces at least 25% less of the alpha-amylase compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 45 . The method of claim 43 , wherein the mutant strain is completely deficient in the production of the alpha-amylase compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 46 . The method of claim 40 , wherein the mutant strain further comprises one or both of the genes tri5 and dps1, and wherein the one or both of the genes are modified rendering the mutant strain deficient in the production of one or both of trichodiene synthase and cyclohexadepsipeptide synthetase, respectively, compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 47 . The method of claim 46 , wherein the mutant strain produces at least 25% less of the one or both of the trichodiene synthase and cyclohexadepsipeptide synthetase compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 48 . The method of claim 46 , wherein the mutant strain is completely deficient in the production of the one or both of the trichodiene synthase and cyclohexadepsipeptide synthetase compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 49 . A method of producing a polypeptide, comprising: (a) cultivating the mutant of a parent Fusarium venenatum strain of claim 30 in a medium for the production of the polypeptide, wherein the mutant strain comprises a polynucleotide encoding the polypeptide and pyrG and alpA genes, and wherein both of the pyrG and alpA genes are modified rendering the mutant strain deficient in the production of orotine-5′-monophosphate decarboxylase and alkaline protease compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions; and (b) recovering the polypeptide from the cultivation medium. 50 . The method of claim 49 , wherein the mutant strain produces at least 25% less of the orotine-5′-monophosphate decarboxylase and alpha-amylase compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 51 . The method of claim 49 , wherein the mutant strain is completely deficient in the production of the orotine-5′-monophosphate decarboxylase and alkaline protease compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 52 . The method of claim 49 , wherein the mutant strain further comprises an amyA gene, and wherein the amyA gene is modified rendering the mutant strain deficient in the production of an alpha-amylase compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 53 . The method of claim 52 , wherein the mutant strain produces at least 25% less of the alpha-amylase compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 54 . The method of claim 52 , wherein the mutant strain is completely deficient in the production of the alpha-amylase compared to the parent Fusarium venenatum strain when cultivated under identical conditions. 55 . The method of claim 49 , wherein the mutant strain further comprises one or both of the genes tri5 and dps1, and wherein the one or both of the genes are modified rendering the mutant strain deficient in the production of one or both of trichodiene synthase and cyclohexadepsipeptide synthetase, respectivel

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Orotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase (4.1.1.23) · CPC title

  • C12N9/242Primary

    Fungal source · CPC title

  • derived from fungi · CPC title

  • having a known sequence of two or more amino acids, e.g. glutathione · CPC title

  • Alpha-amylase (3.2.1.1) · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US2017145462A1 cover?
The present invention relates to methods of producing a polypeptide, comprising: (a) cultivating a mutant of a parent Fusarium venenatum strain in a medium for the production of the polypeptide, wherein the mutant strain comprises a polynucleotide encoding the polypeptide and one or more (several) genes selected from the group consisting of pyrG, amyA, and alpA, wherein the one or more (sever…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Novozymes Inc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification C12N9/242. Mapped technology areas include Chemistry & Metallurgy.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Thu May 25 2017 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (A1). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 1 related publication on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).