Hybrid exploration and inspection robot
US-2024002074-A1 · Jan 4, 2024 · US
US2017073064A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2017073064-A1 |
| Application number | US-201515309361-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Mar 5, 2015 |
| Priority date | May 7, 2014 |
| Publication date | Mar 16, 2017 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
One aspect is a structural fault estimation system for a rotor system. The structural fault estimation system includes a plurality of sensors operable to provide a plurality of measured rotor loads and motion of the rotor system. A rotor loads and motion estimator is operable to produce a plurality of estimated rotor loads and motion for the rotor system. A rotor fault estimator is operable to determine residual rotor loads and motion as a difference between the measured rotor loads and motion and the estimated rotor loads and motion, and estimate fault magnitudes for the rotor system using least squares relative to fault models and the residual rotor loads and motion. The structural fault estimation system can perform structural fault estimation in real-time on an aircraft while in operation.
Opening claim text (preview).
1 . A structural fault estimation system for a rotor system, the structural fault estimation system comprising: a plurality of sensors operable to provide a plurality of measured rotor loads and motion of the rotor system; a rotor loads and motion estimator operable to produce a plurality of estimated rotor loads and motion for the rotor system; and a rotor fault estimator operable to determine residual rotor loads and motion as a difference between the measured rotor loads and motion and the estimated rotor loads and motion, and estimate fault magnitudes for the rotor system using least squares relative to fault models and the residual rotor loads and motion. 2 . The structural fault estimation system according to claim 1 , wherein the fault models comprise a library of fault signatures for a plurality of structural faults of the rotor system. 3 . The structural fault estimation system according to claim 1 , wherein the estimated rotor loads and motion for the rotor system are estimates based on an increased sampling frequency of aircraft state parameters. 4 . The structural fault estimation system according to claim 3 , wherein the aircraft state parameters are updated once per main rotor revolution of the rotor system. 5 . The structural fault estimation system according to claim 4 , wherein a sample rate of the estimated rotor loads and motion is normalized to align with a sample rate of the measured rotor loads and motion. 6 . The structural fault estimation system according to claim 1 , wherein the estimated fault magnitudes are isolated as separate fault conditions per rotor blade of the rotor system. 7 . The structural fault estimation system according to claim 1 , further comprising a fault detector that applies a cumulative sum detector to identify persistent fault changes over time for each of the estimated fault magnitudes. 8 . The structural fault estimation system according to claim 7 , wherein the cumulative sum detector declares a fault condition when a cumulative sum of a corresponding estimated fault magnitude exceeds a cumulative fault threshold. 9 . A method of rotor system structural fault estimation, the method comprising: receiving a plurality of measured rotor loads and motion of a rotor system from a plurality of sensors; producing a plurality of estimated rotor loads and motion for the rotor system based on aircraft state parameters; determining residual rotor loads and motion as a difference between the measured rotor loads and motion and the estimated rotor loads and motion; and estimating fault magnitudes for the rotor system using least squares relative to fault models and the residual rotor loads and motion. 10 . The method according to claim 9 , wherein the fault models comprise a library of fault signatures for a plurality of structural faults of the rotor system. 11 . The method according to claim 9 , wherein the estimated rotor loads and motion for the rotor system are estimates based on an increased sampling frequency of the aircraft state parameters. 12 . The method according to claim 11 , wherein the aircraft state parameters are updated once per main rotor revolution of the rotor system. 13 . The method according to claim 12 , wherein a sample rate of the estimated rotor loads and motion is normalized to align with a sample rate of the measured rotor loads and motion. 14 . The method according to claim 9 , wherein the estimated fault magnitudes are isolated as separate fault conditions per rotor blade of the rotor system. 15 . The method according to claim 9 , further comprising: applying a cumulative sum detector to identify persistent fault changes over time for each of the estimated fault magnitudes; and declaring a fault condition when a cumulative sum of a corresponding estimated fault magnitude exceeds a cumulative fault threshold. 16 . The method according to claim 9 , wherein the receiving a plurality of measured rotor loads and motion of a rotor system from a plurality of sensors includes preprocessing data from the sensors to produce the measured rotor loads and motion.
of aircraft wings or blades · CPC title
for measuring thrust of propulsive devices, e.g. of propellers (aeroplanes B64C; marine propulsion B63H; jet-engines F02K) · CPC title
Safety devices · CPC title
Preprocessing measurements, e.g. data collection rate adjustment; Standardization of measurements; Time series or signal analysis, e.g. frequency analysis or wavelets; Trustworthiness of measurements; Indexes therefor; Measurements using easily measured parameters to estimate parameters difficult to measure; Virtual sensor creation; De-noising; Sensor fusion; Unconventional preprocessing inherently present in specific fault detection methods like PCA-based methods · CPC title
Process history based detection method, e.g. whereby history implies the availability of large amounts of data · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.