Systems and methods for reliable authentication of jewelry and/or gemstones
US-12072294-B2 · Aug 27, 2024 · US
US2016379290A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016379290-A1 |
| Application number | US-201615179262-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Jun 10, 2016 |
| Priority date | Jun 24, 2015 |
| Publication date | Dec 29, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Exemplary systems and methods for generating competitive merchant sets for target merchants are disclosed. One exemplary method includes compiling a sample of merchants from the database of merchants based on a geographic region and/or an industry associated with the merchants; selecting a target merchant from the sample of merchants; and generating from the merchants in the compiled sample of merchants, by a computing device, a competitive merchant set for the target merchant, based on the target merchant and each merchant in the competitive merchant set including at least one transaction to the same payment account
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A computer-implemented method of generating a competitive merchant set for a target merchant, from a database of merchants including transaction data relating to transactions at the merchants by multiple payments accounts, the method comprising: compiling a sample of merchants from the database of merchants based on a geographic region and/or an industry associated with the merchants; selecting a target merchant from the sample of merchants; and generating from the merchants in the compiled sample of merchants, by a computing device, a competitive merchant set for the target merchant, based on the target merchant and each merchant in the competitive merchant set including at least one transaction by the same payment account. 2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining, by the computing device, whether the competitive merchant set satisfies at least one predetermined threshold; and determining and transmitting, by the computing device, to the target merchant, competitor benchmark data based on the generated competitive merchant set, when the competitive merchant set satisfies the predetermined threshold. 3 . The method of claim 2 , further comprising generating from the merchants in the compiled sample of merchants, by the computing device, an alternate competitive merchant set for the target merchant, based on a location of the merchants in the sample relative to a location of the target merchant, when the competitive merchant set fails to satisfy the predetermined threshold. 4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the alternate competitive merchant set is generated based on at least one of a sales level, a merchant category code (MCC), and an average ticket size for the merchants in the alternate competitive merchant set relative to the target merchant; and wherein the alternate competitive merchant set is generated irrespective of the target merchant and each merchant in the alternate competitive merchant set including at least one transaction to the same payment account. 5 . The method of claim 3 , further comprising determining, by the computing device, if the alternate competitive merchant set satisfies a predetermined threshold; determining and transmitting, by the computing device, to the target merchant, competitor benchmark data based on the generated alternate competitive merchant set, when the alternate competitive merchant set satisfies the predetermined threshold; and generating a default competitive merchant set for the target merchant, based on one or more industry averages for merchants in the same industry as the target merchant, when the alternate competitive merchant set fails to satisfies the predetermined threshold. 6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining, by the computing device, if a number of payment accounts associated with the target merchant exceeds a threshold number of accounts; and wherein generating the competitive merchant set includes generating the competitive merchant set when the number of payment accounts associated with the target merchant exceeds the threshold number of accounts. 7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the competitive merchant set includes at least five merchants assigned to a same MCC as the target merchant. 8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the competitive merchant set is based on the target merchant and each merchant in the competitive merchant set including at least one transaction to the same payment account, during a predefined interval. 9 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: for each merchant in the sample of merchants, determining, by the computing device, a merchant score based on: a historic relation score for said merchant in the sample of merchants, based on the target merchant and said merchant in the sample of merchants including at least one transaction to the same payment account; a proximity score for said merchant in the sample of merchants, based on a location of said merchant in the sample of merchants to a location of the target merchant; and/or a ticket size score for said merchant in the sample of merchants, based on a ticket size for said merchant in the sample of merchants relative to a ticket size for the target merchant; and wherein generating the competitive merchant set includes assigning each merchant in the sample of merchants, having a merchant score within a threshold range, to the competitive merchant set. 10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein determining the historic relation score includes: generating, by the computing device, a relationship tree from the sample of merchants, the relationship tree including first-degree merchants to the target merchant; wherein each first-degree merchant includes at least one transaction to the same payment account as the target merchant; and calculating the historic relation score based on an amount of direct overlap of the merchant and the target merchant in the relationship tree. 11 . A system for generating a competitive merchant set for a target merchant, the system comprising: a computing device having a memory configured to store transaction data for multiple payment accounts involving transactions to different merchants, each payment account associated with a consumer, and a processor coupled to the memory, the processor configured to: identify a sample of merchants from the different merchants; generate a competitive merchant set including multiple of the merchants in the sample of merchants based on each of the multiple merchants being involved in a transaction to at least one of the multiple payment accounts, in which the target merchant is involved in a different transaction; and publish the competitive merchant set when a number of merchant within the competitive merchant set satisfies a predefined threshold. 12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the predefined threshold is a first predefined threshold; and wherein the processor is further configured to: generate an alternate competitive merchant set based on a location of the target merchant, when a number of merchants included within the competitive merchant set fails to satisfy a second predefined threshold; and publish the alternate competitive merchant set when a number of merchants within the competitive merchant set satisfies the first predefined threshold. 13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the alternate competitive merchant set is further based on transaction data associated with the target merchant, but not historic relation data of the target merchant and any merchant within the alternate competitive merchant set. 14 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the processor is configured to identify the sample of merchants based on each merchant in the sample being within a same region and a same industry. 15 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the predefined threshold requires at least five merchants. 16 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the processor is configured to: for each merchant in the sample, determine a merchant score based on a proximity of the merchant to the target merchant, a ticket size associated with the merchant, and a historic first-degree relation between the merchant and the target merchant; and generate the competitive merchant set based on the merchant score for each merchant. 17 . A non-transitory computer readable storage media comprising executable instructions that, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to: identify a sample of merchants for a target merchant, based on at least a common
characterised in that multiple accounts are available, e.g. to the payer · CPC title
specially adapted for electronic funds transfer [EFT] systems; specially adapted for home banking systems · CPC title
Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data · CPC title
by pre-processing results, e.g. ranking or ordering results · CPC title
Transactions dependent on location of M-devices · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.