Method of detecting and blocking malicious activity
US-8959639-B2 · Feb 17, 2015 · US
US2016378979A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016378979-A1 |
| Application number | US-201514752890-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Jun 27, 2015 |
| Priority date | Jun 27, 2015 |
| Publication date | Dec 29, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
In an example, there is disclosed a computing apparatus having one or more logic elements providing a security agent operable for: detecting that a first process has launch a second process and placed the second process in a suspended state; detecting that the first process has modified or attempted to modify the second process; classifying the modification as potentially malicious; and taking a remedial action. There is also disclosed one or more computer-readable storage mediums having stored thereon executable instructions for providing the security agent, and a computer-executable method of providing the security agent.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A computing apparatus, comprising: one or more logic elements comprising a security agent operable to: detect that a first process has launch a second process and placed the second process in a suspended state; detect that the first process has modified or attempted to modify the second process; classify the modification as potentially malicious; and take a remedial action. 2 . The computing apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the security agent is further operable to classify the modification as non-malicious, and permitting the first process to execute. 3 . The computing apparatus of claim 1 , wherein detecting that the first process has placed the second process in a suspended state comprises identifying a create-suspended flag. 4 . The computing apparatus of claim 1 , wherein detecting that the first process has placed the second process in a suspended state comprises detecting that a number-of-threads counter has been set to zero. 5 . The computing apparatus of claim 1 , wherein detecting that the first process has placed the second process in a suspended state comprises detecting that no “resume” instruction has been issued for the process. 6 . The computing apparatus of claim 1 , wherein detecting that the first process has placed the second process in a suspended state comprises inserting operating system hooks. 7 . The computing apparatus of claim 1 , wherein detecting that the first process has placed the second process in a suspended state comprises inserting application-level hooks. 8 . The computing apparatus of claim 1 , wherein classifying the modification as potentially malicious comprises determining that the first process has overwritten an entry point of the second process. 9 . The computing apparatus of claim 1 , wherein classifying the modification as potentially malicious comprises detecting that the first process has introduced a jump or branching instruction at or near an entry point of the second process. 10 . The computing apparatus of claim 1 , wherein classifying the modification as potentially malicious comprises detecting that the first process has created a remote thread on the second process. 11 . The computing apparatus of claim 1 , wherein classifying the modification as potentially malicious comprises detecting that the first process has modified an import address table. 12 . The computing apparatus of claim 1 , wherein classifying the modification as potentially malicious comprises providing an operating system or user-mode hook. 13 . The computing apparatus of claim 1 , wherein classifying the modification as potentially malicious comprises detecting that the first process has launched a plurality of processes that together effect a modification to the second process. 14 . One or more tangible, non-transitory computer-readable storage mediums having stored thereon executable instructions for providing a security engine operable for: detecting that a first process has launch a second process and placed the second process in a suspended state; detecting that the first process has modified or attempted to modify the second process; classifying the modification as potentially malicious; and taking a remedial action. 15 . The one or more tangible, non-transitory computer-readable storage mediums of claim 14 , wherein detecting that the first process has placed the second process in a suspended state comprises identifying a create-suspended flag. 16 . The one or more tangible, non-transitory computer-readable storage mediums of claim 14 , wherein detecting that the first process has placed the second process in a suspended state comprises detecting that a number-of-threads counter has been set to zero. 17 . The one or more tangible, non-transitory computer-readable storage mediums of claim 14 , wherein detecting that the first process has placed the second process in a suspended state comprises detecting that no “resume” instruction has been issued for the process. 18 . The one or more tangible, non-transitory computer-readable storage mediums of claim 14 , wherein detecting that the first process has placed the second process in a suspended state comprises inserting operating system hooks. 19 . The one or more tangible, non-transitory computer-readable storage mediums of claim 14 , wherein detecting that the first process has placed the second process in a suspended state comprises inserting application-level hooks. 20 . The one or more tangible, non-transitory computer-readable storage mediums of claim 14 , wherein classifying the modification as potentially malicious comprises determining that the first process has overwritten an entry point of the second process. 21 . The one or more tangible, non-transitory computer-readable storage mediums of claim 14 , wherein classifying the modification as potentially malicious comprises detecting that the first process has introduced a jump or branching instruction at or near an entry point of the second process. 22 . The one or more tangible, non-transitory computer-readable storage mediums of claim 14 , wherein classifying the modification as potentially malicious comprises detecting that the first process has created a remote thread on the second process. 23 . The one or more tangible, non-transitory computer-readable storage mediums of claim 14 , wherein classifying the modification as potentially malicious comprises detecting that the first process has modified an import address table. 24 . A computer-executable method of providing a security agent, comprising: detecting that a first process has launch a second process and placed the second process in a suspended state; detecting that the first process has modified or attempted to modify the second process; classifying the modification as potentially malicious; and taking a remedial action. 25 . The method of claim 24 , wherein detecting that the first process has placed the second process in a suspended state comprises identifying a create-suspended flag.
interconnection devices, e.g. bus-connected or in-line devices · CPC title
the attack involving the propagation of malware through the network, e.g. viruses, trojans or worms · CPC title
Test or assess software · CPC title
Dual mode as a secondary aspect · CPC title
involving event detection and direct action · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.