Method and device for automatically monitoring a self-contained approach of an aircraft

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-2016362192-A1
Application number	US-201615181224-A
Country	US
Kind code	A1
Filing date	Jun 13, 2016
Priority date	Jun 11, 2015
Publication date	Dec 15, 2016
Grant date	—

Abstract

A method and device for automatically monitoring a self-contained approach of an aircraft. The device ( 1 ) includes a computation unit ( 8 ) for calculating, in real time, a first limit depending on a decision height entered by a pilot and a second limit depending on the current height of the aircraft and for selecting, as an alert limit, the maximum value between the first limit and the second limit, a computation unit ( 9 ) for calculating, in real time, a protection limit depending on performance of the aircraft, a comparison unit ( 10 ) for comparing the protection limit with the alert limit, and an alert unit ( 13 ) for emitting an alert signal if the protection limit is greater than the alert limit.

First claim

1 . A method for automatically monitoring a self-contained approach of an aircraft, the method comprising
entering a decision height, and a monitoring step, the monitoring step being implemented in an automatic manner and including:
a first computation step including calculating at least one alert limit at least from a first limit depending on the decision height;
a second computation step including calculating, in real time, at least one protection limit depending on performance of the aircraft;
a comparison step including comparing, in real time, the protection limit with the alert limit;
an alert step including emitting an alert signal if the protection limit is greater than the alert limit; and
a step for generating data including automatically determining, in real time, a current height of the aircraft,
wherein the first computation step includes calculating, in real time, a second limit depending on the current height of the aircraft and of selecting, as an alert limit, the maximum value between the first limit and the second limit, the alert limit thus determined being used by the comparison step.

2 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the monitoring step is implemented for two alert limits and two protection limits including:
a horizontal protection limit associated with a horizontal alert limit; and a vertical protection limit associated with a vertical alert limit.

3 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the first computation step includes calculating the second limit by using a mathematical expression identical to that used to calculate the first limit, using the current height in place of the decision height.

4 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein, for a horizontal protection limit, the first computation step includes calculating the second limit HAL hAC from the current height hAC of the aircraft, using the mathematical expression below, expressed in meters:
HAL hAC =0.075*hAC+25.

5 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein, for a vertical protection limit, the first computation step includes calculating the second limit VAL hAC from the current height hAC of the aircraft, using the mathematical expression below, expressed in meters:
VAL hAC =0.08375*hAC+16.25.

6 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the step for generating data includes using, as a current height of the aircraft, a current altitude of the aircraft, defined in relation to the altitude of a runway towards which the self-contained approach is made and provided by at least one air data and inertial unit.

7 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the step for generating data includes calculating the current height hAC of the aircraft by means of the expression below, expressed in feet:
hAC=ZAC−( Za− 50)
wherein:
ZAC is a current altitude of the aircraft, not defined in relation to the altitude of a runway and provided by at least one air data and inertial unit; and
Za is an altitude of an aiming point of the self-contained approach.

8 . A method for managing a self-contained approach of an aircraft, said method including calculating control orders, the control orders being transmitted to at least one system for assisting with flying the aircraft,
and the method for automatically monitoring the self-contained approach is such as that specified under claim 1 .

9 . A device for automatically monitoring a self-contained approach of an aircraft, the device comprising:
a unit for entering a decision height and a unit for automatic monitoring, the unit for automatic monitoring including:
a first computation unit configured to calculate at least one alert limit at least from a first limit depending on the decision height;
a second computation unit configured to calculate, in real time, at least one protection limit depending on performance of the aircraft;
a comparison unit configured to compare the protection limit with the alert limit;
an alert unit configured to emit an alert signal if the protection limit is greater than the alert limit; and
a data generating, unit configured to automatically determining, in real time, a current height of the aircraft,
wherein the first computation unit is configured to calculate, in real time, a second limit depending on the current height of the aircraft and for selecting, as an alert limit, the maximum value between the first limit and the second limit, the alert limit thus determined being used by the comparison unit.

10 . A system for managing a self-contained approach of an aircraft, said management system including a computation unit configured to calculate control orders, the control orders being transmitted to at least one system for assisting with flying the aircraft, said management system also
the device for automatically monitoring the self-contained approach recited in claim 9 .

11 . A method to monitor a self-contained approach of an aircraft comprising:
receiving a decision height corresponding to a landing approach for the aircraft; calculating a first alert limit based on the decision height, wherein the repeatedly determining a height of the aircraft during the landing approach and designating the most recent height as a current height of the aircraft; repeatedly calculating a protection limit based on the current height of the aircraft and during the landing approach and designating the most recent protection limit as a current protection limit; repeatedly calculating a second alert limit based on the current height of the aircraft and during the landing approach and designating the most recent second alert limit as a current second alert limit; selecting as a maximum alert limit a maximum of the first alert limit and the current second alert limit; repeatedly comparing the current protection limit to the maximum alert limit; issuing an alert signal to an aircrew of the aircraft if the protection limit is greater than the maximum alert limit.

12 . The method of claim 1 wherein the first alert limit is at least on one of a horizontal first alert limit and a first vertical alert limit; the second alert limit is at least one of a horizontal second alert limit and a second vertical alert limit, and the protection limit is at least one of a horizontal protection limit and a vertical protection limit.

13 . The method of claim 1 wherein the steps are performed automatically except that the step of receiving is performed in response to a manual input of the decision height.

14 . The method of claim 1 wherein a flight management system on the aircraft automatically performs the steps except that the step of receiving is performed in response to a manual input of the decision height.

Assignees

• Airbus Operations Sas

Inventors

• Roux Yohann

Classifications

• G08G5/54

  for approach or landing · CPC title

• G08G5/21 Primary

  located onboard the aircraft · CPC title

• G05D1/0676

  specially adapted for landing · CPC title

• G05D1/0055

  with safety arrangements · CPC title

• G08G5/02

  Physics · mapped topic