Method of cutting a thread between two substrates
US-2015374558-A1 · Dec 31, 2015 · US
US2016349152A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016349152-A1 |
| Application number | US-201514726720-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Jun 1, 2015 |
| Priority date | Jun 1, 2015 |
| Publication date | Dec 1, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method for aligning composite work cycle seventies to target percentile severity responses includes selecting a set of machines to be monitored for severity, applying an operation classification corresponding to one or more machine operations performed by each machine in the set of machines, applying a severity indexing system to the set of machines, constructing a distribution of severity responses associated with an operation classification, receiving data from one or more performed damage simulations or tests and mapping a selected range of test event seventies for the operation classification to corresponding target actual seventies for the operation based upon performance of the operation by the machine.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A method for aligning composite work cycle seventies to target percentile severity responses comprising: selecting a set of machines to be monitored for severity; applying an operation classification corresponding to one or more machine operations performed by each machine in the set of machines; applying a severity indexing system to the set of machines; constructing a distribution of severity responses associated with an operation classification; receiving data from one or more performed damage simulations or tests; and mapping a selected range of test event seventies for the operation classification to corresponding target actual seventies for the operation based upon performance of the operation by the machine. 2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the machines in the selected set of machines is the same. 3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein applying an operation classification includes: recognizing a plurality of operation segments that comprise a machine operation based upon receiving one or more measured machine parameters. 4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the parameters include engine parameters, machine speed, cylinder position, and cylinder pressure. 5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein applying a severity indexing system includes: receiving at least one of a direct or indirect severity measurement relating to an operation, wherein the direct severity measurement is measured at one or more locations on the machine and the indirect severity measurement is calculated at one or more locations on the machine; and using the received direct or indirect severity measurement to quantify a total severity index for the operation for at least one machine in the selected set of machines. 6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein a direct severity measurement is obtained using a strain measurement device. 7 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the constructing a distribution of severity responses includes: constructing a histogram for the total severity index, wherein the histogram includes operation severity indices for machines falling within a target confidence interval for a target percentile of severity for a particular severity response, and wherein the histogram represents an observed variability in the total severity index for a respective operation between machines that are determined to fall within a target percentile of total severity. 8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the histogram includes a sample mean severity index indicator line. 9 . The method of claim 1 , further including; comparing a damage rate goal for a target percentile of machines to collected test or simulation severity data. 10 . The method of claim 9 , further including: utilizing simulation or test results to calculate a damage rate for an ensemble of operation classification fractions applied to one or more machines in a target confidence interval for a target percentile of severity to generate the histogram, wherein the histogram also includes a damage rage goal indicator providing a visual indication that a target range of test event severities is met. 11 . A method for aligning composite work cycle seventies to target percentile severity responses comprising: selecting a set of machines to be monitored for severity; applying an operation classification corresponding to a machine operation for each machine in the set of machines; applying a severity indexing system to the set of machines; constructing a distribution of severity responses associated with the operation classification; mapping a selected range of test event seventies for the operation classification to corresponding target actual seventies for the operation based upon performance of the operation by the machine; and verifying that a target range of test event seventies is met using the mapping. 12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein each of the machines in the selected set of machines is the same. 13 . The method of claim 11 , wherein applying an operation classification includes: recognizing a plurality of operation segments that comprise a machine operation based upon receiving one or more measured machine parameters. 14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the parameters include engine parameters, machine speed, cylinder position, and cylinder pressure. 15 . The method of claim 11 , wherein applying a severity indexing system includes: receiving at least one of a direct or indirect severity measurement relating to an operation, wherein the direct severity measurement is measured at one or more locations on the machine and the indirect severity measurement is calculated at one or more locations on the machine; and using the received direct or indirect severity measurement to quantify a total severity index for the operation for at least one machine in the selected set of machines. 16 . The method of claim 15 , wherein a direct severity measurement is obtained using a strain measurement device. 17 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the constructing a distribution of severity responses includes: constructing a histogram for the total severity index, wherein the histogram includes operation severity indices for machines falling within a target confidence interval for a target percentile of severity for a particular severity response, and wherein the histogram represents an observed variability in the total severity index for a respective operation between machines that are determined to fall within a target percentile of total severity. 18 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the histogram includes a sample mean severity index indicator line. 19 . The method of claim 11 , further including: comparing a damage rate goal for a target percentile of machines to collected test or simulation severity data. 20 . A computer-readable medium including a processor configured to execute instructions stored on the computer-readable medium to perform a method for aligning composite work cycle severity distributions to target percentile severity responses comprising: selecting a set of machines to be monitored for severity; applying an operation classification corresponding to a machine operation for each machine in the set of machines; applying a severity indexing system to the set of machines; constructing a distribution of severity responses associated with the operation classification; mapping a selected range of test event seventies for the operation classification to corresponding target actual seventies for the operation based upon performance of the operation by the machine; and verifying that a target range of test event seventies is met using the mapping.
by doing functionality tests · CPC title
Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling · CPC title
Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass · CPC title
Administration of product repair or maintenance · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.