Social media message delivery based on user location
US-9722963-B2 · Aug 1, 2017 · US
US2016299933A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016299933-A1 |
| Application number | US-201514681388-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Apr 8, 2015 |
| Priority date | Apr 8, 2015 |
| Publication date | Oct 13, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Embodiments of the invention provide systems and methods for implementing process metadata triggers and events. More specifically, embodiments of the present invention allow for process metadata events to be defined and generated, including the program code and interfaces that may define the triggering criteria and actions associated with the events. Certain embodiments include ongoing evaluations of triggering criteria for events, including criteria both internal and external to an enterprise system, and generating new event occurrences based on the evaluations of triggering criteria for events. Events and event occurrences may be tracked and monitored, and programmatic actions may be initiated in response to the creation or modification of an event or an event occurrence, including modification of enterprise system software, generation and transmission of targeted user notifications, the generation and customization of electronic documents, and the like.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A method for generating an event occurrence object, the method comprising: generating an event occurrence object based on a determination that one or more trigger criteria has occurred; determining a plurality of users associated with the event occurrence object; modifying one or more multi-user software applications to permit selection of the event occurrence object by the plurality of users; determining that a first user in the plurality of users has selected the event occurrence object via the one or more multi-user software applications; and in response to determining that the first user has selected the event occurrence object, modifying the one or more multi-user software applications to prevent selection of the event occurrence object by other users in the plurality of users. 2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the event occurrence object comprises: querying a database associated with the one or more multi-user software applications; and comparing results of the query with a plurality of trigger criteria corresponding to a plurality of different events. 3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the event occurrence object comprises: receiving an electronic communication from a user authorized to initiate event occurrences, the electronic communication identifying a first event; and generating the event occurrence object as an occurrence of the first event, in response to the electronic communication. 4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the event occurrence object comprises: retrieving scheduling criteria for generating the event occurrence object; periodically polling one or more computer hardware resources associated with the one or more multi-user software applications, in accordance with the retrieved scheduling criteria; and generating the event occurrence object based on results of the periodically polling one or more computer hardware resources, and based on the retrieved scheduling criteria. 5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining that the first user has deselected the event occurrence object; and in response to determining that the first user has deselected the event occurrence object, modifying the one or more multi-user software applications to permit selection of the event occurrence object by other users in the plurality of users. 6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving an indication that the first user has completed an action associated with the event occurrence object; and in response to receiving the indication, removing the event occurrence object from a list of active event occurrence objects. 7 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining that an action associated with the event occurrence object has not been completed within a predetermined time period following the selection of the event occurrence object by the first user; and in response to said determination, modifying the one or more multi-user software applications to permit selection of the event occurrence object by other users in the plurality of users. 8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the event occurrence object comprises: retrieving a list of one or more electronic documents associated with the event occurrence object; generating one or more new electronic documents corresponding to the retrieved list; querying a database associated with the one or more multi-user software applications; and modifying the one or more new electronic documents based on the results of the query. 9 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising: in response to determining that the first user has selected the event occurrence object, retrieving user data corresponding to the first user; and modifying the one or more new electronic documents based on the retrieved user data corresponding to the first user. 10 . A system comprising: a processor; and a memory coupled with and readable by the processor and storing therein a set of instructions which, when executed by the processor, causes the processor to generate an event occurrence object by: generating an event occurrence object based on a determination that one or more trigger criteria has occurred; determining a plurality of users associated with the event occurrence object; modifying one or more multi-user software applications to permit selection of the event occurrence object by the plurality of users; determining that a first user in the plurality of users has selected the event occurrence object via the one or more multi-user software applications; and in response to determining that the first user has selected the event occurrence object, modifying the one or more multi-user software applications to prevent selection of the event occurrence object by other users in the plurality of users. 11 . The system of claim 10 , wherein generating the event occurrence object comprises: querying a database associated with the one or more multi-user software applications; and comparing results of the query with a plurality of triggering conditions corresponding to a plurality of different events. 12 . The system of claim 10 , wherein generating the event occurrence object comprises: receiving an electronic communication from a user authorized to initiate event occurrences, the electronic communication identifying a first event; and generating the event occurrence object as an occurrence of the first event, in response to the electronic communication. 13 . The system of claim 10 , wherein generating the event occurrence object comprises: retrieving scheduling criteria for generating the event occurrence object; periodically polling one or more computer hardware resources associated with the one or more multi-user software applications, in accordance with the retrieved scheduling criteria; and generating the event occurrence object based on results of the periodically polling one or more computer hardware resources, and based on the retrieved scheduling criteria. 14 . The system of claim 10 , the memory storing therein further instructions which, when executed by the processor, causes the processor to: determine that the first user has deselected the event occurrence object; and in response to determining that the first user has deselected the event occurrence object, modify the one or more multi-user software applications to permit selection of the event occurrence object by other users in the plurality of users. 15 . The system of claim 10 , the memory storing therein further instructions which, when executed by the processor, causes the processor to: receive an indication that the first user has completed an action associated with the event occurrence object; and in response to receiving the indication, remove the event occurrence object from a list of active event occurrence objects. 16 . The system of claim 10 , the memory storing therein further instructions which, when executed by the processor, causes the processor to: determine that an action associated with the event occurrence object has not been completed within a predetermined time period following the selection of the event occurrence object by the first user; and in response to said determination, modify the one or more multi-user software applications to permit selection of the event occurrence object by other users in the plurality of users. 17 . A computer-readable memory comprising a set of instructions stored therein which, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to genera
Physics · mapped topic
Physics · mapped topic
Physics · mapped topic
Locking methods, e.g. distributed locking or locking implementation details · CPC title
Triggers; Constraints · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.