Dynamic selection of appropriate far-field signal separation algorithms
US-2024257825-A1 · Aug 1, 2024 · US
US2016293179A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016293179-A1 |
| Application number | US-201615178530-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Jun 9, 2016 |
| Priority date | Dec 11, 2013 |
| Publication date | Oct 6, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method includes estimating a spatial coherence between a first diffuse sound portion in a first microphone signal and a second diffuse sound portion in a second microphone signal. The first microphone signal is captured by a first microphone and the second microphone signal is captured by a second microphone which is spaced apart from the first microphone in a known manner. The method further includes defining a linear constraint for filter coefficients of a diffuse sound filter, the linear constraint being based on the spatial coherence. The method also includes calculating at least one of signal statistics and noise statistics over the first microphone signal and the second microphone signal. The method also includes determining the filter coefficients of the diffuse sound filter by solving an optimization problem concerning at least one of the signal statistics and noise statistics while considering the linear constraint for the filter coefficients.
Opening claim text (preview).
1 . A method comprising: defining a linear constraint for filter coefficients of a diffuse sound filter, the linear constraint being based on a spatial coherence between a first diffuse sound portion in a first microphone signal and a second diffuse sound portion in a second microphone signal, the first microphone signal being captured by a first microphone and the second microphone signal being captured by a second microphone spaced apart from the first microphone in a known manner; calculating at least one of a direction of arrival of at least one direct sound, signal statistics over the first and second microphone signals, and noise statistics over the first and second microphone signals; and determining the filter coefficients of the diffuse sound filter by solving an optimization problem concerning at least one of the direction of arrival of the at least one direct sound, the signal statistics, and the noise statistics while considering the linear constraint for the filter coefficients. 2 . The method according to claim 1 , further comprising providing the spatial coherence on the basis of a relative transfer function or a correlation of the diffuse sound between the first microphone and the second microphone. 3 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the spatial coherence is based on a prior measurement of a relative transfer function or a correlation of the diffuse sound for a given environment during time periods in which no direct sound is present in the environment. 4 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the spatial coherence is based on a theoretical relation for the diffuse sound, wherein a corresponding assumed diffuse sound field has assumed theoretical properties regarding a correlation of the diffuse sound between the first microphone and the second microphone. 5 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the optimization problem is expressed by w m ( k , n ) = argmin w J ( w ) subject to the linear constraint w H b m ( k,n )=1, wherein w(k,n) is a vector of the filter coefficients of the diffuse sound filter; w m (k,n) is a solution of the optimization problem based on an evaluation of a microphone signal at the m-th microphone; J(w) is a cost function; b m (k,n) is a vector of estimated spatial coherences, wherein the m′-th element of the vector is an estimated spatial coherence of the diffuse sound between the m-th microphone and the m′-th microphone; k is a frequency domain index; and n is a time domain index. 6 . The method according to claim 5 , wherein the cost function J(w) is based on one of noise statistics, a noise power spectral density (PSD) matrix, signal statistics, or a microphone power spectral density (PSD) matrix. 7 . The method according to claim 1 , further comprising estimating at least one of a direction of arrival of at least one direct sound or a relative transfer function of the at least one direct sound between the first microphone and the second microphone; computing at least one direct sound constraint using the direction of arrival or the relative transfer function of the at least one direct sound, wherein the at least one direct sound constraint results in a suppression of the at least one direct sound. 8 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein a solution to the optimization problem is w m ( k , n ) = φ d ( k , n ) β + 1 Φ x - 1 ( k , n ) b m with β=α(φ d b m H Φ x −1 b m ) wherein w m (k,n) is a solution of the optimization problem based on an evaluation of a microphone signal at the m-th microphone; b m (k,n) is a vector of estimated spatial coherences, wherein the m′-th element of the vector is an estimated spatial coherence of the diffuse sound between the m-th microphone and the m′-th microphone; αΣ[0,1] is a user-defined control parameter by which the diffuse sound filter can be scaled between a minimum mean square error spatial filter and a filter that minimizes the output power while satisfying the diffuse sound constraint; φ d is a diffuse sound power; and Φ x is a power spectrum matrix of the microphone signals. 9 . The method according to claim 8 , further comprising estimating the diffuse sound power φ d on the basis of an auxiliary diffuse sound filter. 10 . The method according to claim 9 , wherein estimating the diffuse sound power φ d is performed based on φ ^ d ( k , n ) = w 1 H ( k , n )
characterised by the type of parameter measurement, e.g. correlation techniques, zero crossing techniques or predictive techniques · CPC title
for combining the signals of two or more microphones (specially adapted for hearing aids H04R25/407) · CPC title
the noise being echo, reverberation of the speech · CPC title
Speech enhancement, e.g. noise reduction or echo cancellation (reducing echo effects in line transmission systems H04B3/20; echo suppression in hands-free telephones H04M9/08) · CPC title
Noise filtering · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.