System and method for quality review of healthcare reporting and feedback
US-2015134349-A1 · May 14, 2015 · US
US2016267232A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016267232-A1 |
| Application number | US-201514941445-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Nov 13, 2015 |
| Priority date | Mar 13, 2015 |
| Publication date | Sep 15, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A computer system increases the efficiency with which billing codes may be generated based on a chart, such as a medical chart. The computer system provides the chart to a computer-assisted coding (CAC) module, which produces an initial set of billing codes and an initial assessment of the accuracy and/or completeness of the codes. The computer system decides whether to send the initial set of billing codes to an initial human reviewer. If the computer system sends the initial set of billing codes to the initial human reviewer, then the initial human reviewer reviews the chart and the output of the CAC module, and attempts to fix errors in the CAC output. The system provides the chart and the current (initial or modified) codes to a final human reviewer, who may be more highly skilled than the initial human reviewer, for final verification and modification.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A method performed by at least one computer processor executing computer program instructions stored on at least one non-transitory computer-readable medium, the method comprising: (A) receiving data representing a medical chart; (B) providing the medical chart to a computer-assisted coding (CAC) module; (C) receiving an initial set of billing codes from the CAC module; (D) providing the initial set of billing codes to an initial human reviewer; (E) receiving, from the initial human reviewer, a modified set of billing codes and data representing an assessment of accuracy and completeness of the initial set of billing codes; and (F) providing the medical chart and the modified set of billing codes to a final human reviewer. 2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: (G) before (D), determining whether the initial set of billing codes should be provided to the initial human reviewer; and wherein (D) comprises providing the initial set of billing codes to the initial human reviewer in response to determining that the initial set of billing codes should be provided to the initial human reviewer. 3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein determining whether the initial set of billing codes should be provided to the initial human reviewer comprises determining whether the initial human reviewer is likely to add value to the initial set of billing codes. 4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein determining whether the initial human reviewer is likely to add value to the initial set of billing codes comprises determining whether the medical chart describes a complex medical procedure. 5 . The method of claim 3 , wherein determining whether the initial human review is likely to add value to the initial set of billing codes comprises determining whether the initial human reviewer is sufficiently skilled to add value to the initial set of billing codes. 6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: (G) before (B), determining whether the medical chart qualifies for fully-automated coding; and wherein (B) comprises providing the medical chart to the CAC module in response to determining that the medical chart qualifies for fully-automated coding. 7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the data representing the medical chart includes data representing a freeform text document. 8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the data representing the medical chart includes data representing a structured document. 9 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the data representing the structured document comprises data representing an XML document. 10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the data representing the medical chart comprises data representing a data record in a database. 11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the data representing the medical chart includes data representing at least two of a freeform text document, an XML document, and a data record in a database. 12 . A system comprising at least one non-transitory computer-readable medium storing computer program instructions executable by at least one computer processor to perform a method, the method comprising: (A) receiving data representing a medical chart; (B) providing the medical chart to a computer-assisted coding (CAC) module; (C) receiving an initial set of billing codes from the CAC module; (D) providing the initial set of billing codes to an initial human reviewer; (E) receiving, from the initial human reviewer, a modified set of billing codes and data representing an assessment of accuracy and completeness of the initial set of billing codes; and (F) providing the medical chart and the modified set of billing codes to a final human reviewer. 13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the method further comprises: (G) before (D), determining whether the initial set of billing codes should be provided to the initial human reviewer; and wherein (D) comprises providing the initial set of billing codes to the initial human reviewer in response to determining that the initial set of billing codes should be provided to the initial human reviewer. 14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein determining whether the initial set of billing codes should be provided to the initial human reviewer comprises determining whether the initial human reviewer is likely to add value to the initial set of billing codes. 15 . The system of claim 14 , wherein determining whether the initial human reviewer is likely to add value to the initial set of billing codes comprises determining whether the medical chart describes a complex medical procedure. 16 . The system of claim 14 , wherein determining whether the initial human review is likely to add value to the initial set of billing codes comprises determining whether the initial human reviewer is sufficiently skilled to add value to the initial set of billing codes. 17 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the method further comprises: (G) before (B), determining whether the medical chart qualifies for fully-automated coding; and wherein (B) comprises providing the medical chart to the CAC module in response to determining that the medical chart qualifies for fully-automated coding. 18 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the data representing the medical chart includes data representing a freeform text document. 19 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the data representing the medical chart includes data representing a structured document. 20 . The system of claim 16 , wherein the data representing the structured document comprises data representing an XML document. 21 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the data representing the medical chart comprises data representing a data record in a database. 22 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the data representing the medical chart includes data representing at least two of a freeform text document, an XML document, and a data record in a database.
Physics · mapped topic
Physics · mapped topic
Office automation; Time management · CPC title
for patient-specific data, e.g. for electronic patient records · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.