Modeling of interaction of hydraulic fractures in complex fracture networks

US2016265331A1 · US · A1

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-2016265331-A1
Application numberUS-201415034927-A
CountryUS
Kind codeA1
Filing dateNov 6, 2014
Priority dateNov 4, 2011
Publication dateSep 15, 2016
Grant date

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Methods of performing a fracture operation at a wellsite with a fracture network are provided. The methods involve obtaining wellsite data and a mechanical earth model, and generating a hydraulic fracture growth pattern for the fracture network over time. The generating involves extending hydraulic fractures from a wellbore and into the fracture network of a subterranean formation to form a hydraulic fracture network, determining hydraulic fracture parameters after the extending, determining transport parameters for proppant passing through the hydraulic fracture network, and determining fracture dimensions of the hydraulic fractures from the hydraulic fracture parameters, the transport parameters and the mechanical earth model. The methods also involve performing stress shadowing on the hydraulic fractures to determine stress interference between fractures at different depths, and repeating the generating based on the determined stress interference. The methods may also involve determining crossing behavior.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1 . A method of performing a fracture operation at a wellsite, the wellsite positioned about a subterranean formation having a wellbore therethrough and a fracture network therein, the fracture network comprising natural fractures, the wellsite stimulated by injection of an injection fluid with proppant into the fracture network, the method comprising: obtaining wellsite data comprising natural fracture parameters of the natural fractures and obtaining a mechanical earth model of the subterranean formation; generating a hydraulic fracture growth pattern for the fracture network over time, the generating comprising: extending hydraulic fractures from the wellbore and into the fracture network of the subterranean formation to form a hydraulic fracture network comprising the natural fractures and the hydraulic fractures; determining hydraulic fracture parameters of the hydraulic fractures after the extending; determining transport parameters for the proppant passing through the hydraulic fracture network; and determining fracture dimensions of the hydraulic fractures from the determined hydraulic fracture parameters, the determined transport parameters and the mechanical earth model; and performing stress shadowing on the hydraulic fractures to determine stress interference between the hydraulic fractures at different depths; and repeating the generating based on the determined stress interference. 2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the performing stress shadowing comprises performing a three dimensional displacement discontinuity method. 3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the performing stress shadowing comprises performing a first stress shadowing to determine interference between the hydraulic fractures and performing a second stress shadowing to determine interference between the hydraulic fractures at different depths. 4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the performing stress shadowing comprises performing a two dimensional displacement discontinuity method and performing a three dimensional displacement discontinuity method. 5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising if the hydraulic fractures encounter another fracture, determining crossing behavior at the encountered another fracture, and wherein the repeating comprises repeating the generating based on the determined stress interference and the crossing behavior. 6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the hydraulic fracture growth pattern is one of unaltered and altered by the crossing behavior. 7 . The method of claim 5 , wherein a fracture pressure of the hydraulic fracture network is greater than a stress acting on the encountered fracture and wherein the fracture growth pattern propagates along the encountered fracture. 8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the fracture growth pattern continues to propagate along the encountered fracture until an end of the natural fracture is reached. 9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the fracture growth pattern changes direction at the end of the natural fracture, the fracture growth pattern extending in a direction normal to a minimum stress at the end of the natural fracture. 10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the fracture growth pattern propagates normal to a local principal stress according to the stress shadowing. 11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the stress shadowing comprises performing displacement discontinuity for each of the hydraulic fractures. 12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the stress shadowing comprises performing the stress shadowing about multiple wellbores of a wellsite and repeating the generating using the stress shadowing performed on the multiple wellbores. 13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the stress shadowing comprises performing the stress shadowing at multiple stimulation stages in the wellbore. 14 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising validating the fracture growth pattern by comparing the fracture growth pattern with at least one simulation of stimulation of the fracture network. 15 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the extending comprises extending the hydraulic fractures along the hydraulic fracture growth pattern based on the natural fracture parameters and a minimum stress and a maximum stress on the subterranean formation. 16 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining fracture dimensions comprises one of evaluating seismic measurements, ant tracking, sonic measurements, geological measurements and combinations thereof. 17 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the wellsite data further comprises at least one of geological, petrophysical, geomechanical, log measurements, completion, historical and combinations thereof. 18 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the natural fracture parameters are generated by one of observing borehole imaging logs, estimating fracture dimensions from wellbore measurements, obtaining microseismic images, and combinations thereof. 19 . A method of performing a fracture operation at a wellsite, the wellsite positioned about a subterranean formation having a wellbore therethrough and a fracture network therein, the fracture network comprising natural fractures, the wellsite stimulated by injection of an injection fluid with proppant into the fracture network, the method comprising: obtaining wellsite data comprising natural fracture parameters of the natural fractures and obtaining a mechanical earth model of the subterranean formation; generating a hydraulic fracture growth pattern for the fracture network over time, the generating comprising: extending hydraulic fractures from the wellbore and into the fracture network of the subterranean formation to form a hydraulic fracture network comprising the natural fractures and the hydraulic fractures; determining hydraulic fracture parameters of the hydraulic fractures after the extending; determining transport parameters for the proppant passing through the hydraulic fracture network; and determining fracture dimensions of the hydraulic fractures from the determined hydraulic fracture parameters, the determined transport parameters and the mechanical earth model; and performing stress shadowing on the hydraulic fractures to determine stress interference between the hydraulic fractures; performing an additional stress shadowing on the hydraulic fractures to determine stress interference between the hydraulic fractures at different depths; if the hydraulic fracture encounters another fracture, determining crossing behavior between the hydraulic fractures and an encountered fracture based on the determined stress interference; and repeating the generating based on the determined stress interference and the crossing behavior. 20 . The method of claim 19 , further comprising validating the fracture growth pattern. 21 . A method of performing a fracture operation at a wellsite, the wellsite positioned about a subterranean formation having a wellbore therethrough and a fracture network therein, the fracture network comprising natural fractures, the method comprising: stimulating the wellsite by injection of an injection fluid with proppant into the fracture network; obtaining wellsite data comprising natural fracture parameters of the natural fractures and obtaining a mechanical earth model of the subterranean formation; generating a hydraulic fracture growth pattern for the fracture network over time, the generating comprising: extending hydraulic fractures from the wellbore and into the fracture networ

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Design optimisation, verification or simulation (optimisation, verification or simulation of circuit designs G06F30/30) · CPC title

  • E21B43/267Primary

    reinforcing fractures by propping · CPC title

  • Physics · mapped topic

  • Testing the nature of borehole walls; Formation testing; Methods or apparatus for obtaining samples of soil or well fluids, specially adapted to earth drilling or wells · CPC title

  • by forming crevices or fractures · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US2016265331A1 cover?
Methods of performing a fracture operation at a wellsite with a fracture network are provided. The methods involve obtaining wellsite data and a mechanical earth model, and generating a hydraulic fracture growth pattern for the fracture network over time. The generating involves extending hydraulic fractures from a wellbore and into the fracture network of a subterranean formation to form a hyd…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Schlumberger Technology Corp
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification E21B43/267. Mapped technology areas include Fixed Constructions.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Thu Sep 15 2016 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (A1). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).