System and Method For Big Data Geographic Information System Discovery

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-2016259357-A1
Application number	US-201615058385-A
Country	US
Kind code	A1
Filing date	Mar 2, 2016
Priority date	Mar 3, 2015
Publication date	Sep 8, 2016
Grant date	—

Abstract

A system and method for learning and asserting what portions of a utility GIS network model are incorrect or flawed as they relate to real world conditions, and what the correct real world relationships are in the field is described. The system and method leverage available smart grid data to assess the quality of a primary (GIS) source data set; quality data renders derived analyses across the utility valid, sound, and action worthy. The system and method utilize existing partially correct electrical network distribution model data and various non-specialized source data including smart meter, spatial, and customer information data collected from the network to test, validate and suggest corrections to the connectivity model. By forming putative ground truth assignments between utility components, the system tests the assumptions by examining the geospatial proximity and correlating voltage and event data over time to form refined hypothesis. These hypotheses are compared to the existing model and statistical tests are performed at a variety of confidence levels to propose a corrected network model to the user.

First claim

1 . A process for assessing the correctness of utility component mapping relationships comprising:
receiving at a first server a first data set indicative of a first mapping of grid components for a predetermined geographical area, the first data set being from a first source; enriching by an enrichment component running on a server the first data set to include additional details related to the grid components within the predetermined geographical area to produce a second data set indicative of a second mapping of the grid component for the predetermine geographical area, the additional details being from one or more additional sources; analyzing by an analytical component running on a server the first mapping of grid components and the second mapping of grid components for the predetermined geographical area to determine a validity of each individual mapping between two or more grid components in the first mapping and storing results of the determined validity in at least one storage component; and providing by an output component with access to the at least one storage component an indicator of the determined validity of each individual mapping between two or more grid components in the first mapping.

2 . The process of claim 1 , wherein the grid components include meters and transformers within the predetermined geographical area.

3 . The process of claim 2 , wherein the predetermined geographical area is determined in accordance with a location of at least one substation.

4 . The process of claim 2 , wherein the first data set includes individual mappings between meters, transformers, circuits and phases.

5 . The process of claim 4 , wherein the first data set further includes phase data associated with each individual meter and transformer mapping.

6 . The process of claim 2 , wherein the additional details related to the grid components are selected from the group consisting of: data related to one or more specific meters identified in the first data set; data related to one or more additional meters not identified in the first data set; data related to event details for one or more grid components identified in the first data set.

7 . The process of claim 1 , further comprising:
presenting by the analytical component an alternative mapping to an individual mapping when a determined validity of the individual mapping is low and assigning a probability threshold to the alternative mapping, the probability threshold being an indicator of the likelihood that the alternative mapping is accurate over the individual mapping; receiving a selected probability threshold, wherein when a probability threshold for an alternative mapping is above the selected probability threshold, the individual mapping is identified as a suspected error.

8 . The process of claim 1 , wherein the analytical component applies one or more analytical methods selected from the group consisting of Point of Common Control (PCC) voltage comparison and Kmeans.

9 . The process of claim 8 , wherein the analytical component applies a Multi-Hypothesis Tracking (MHT) process to determine validity of the individual mapping and present alternative mappings.

10 . The process of claim 1 , wherein each individual mapping between two or more grid components includes one of the following mappings: meter-to-transformer; transformer-to-phase; meter-to-phase; meter-to-circuit and transformer-to-circuit.

11 . A system for assessing the correctness of utility component mapping relationships comprising:
a first subsystem including at least a first database for receiving a first data set indicative of a first mapping of grid components for a predetermined geographical area, the first data set being from a first source; the first subsystem further including an enrichment component running on a processor for enriching the first data set to include additional details related to the grid components within the predetermined geographical area to produce a second data set indicative of a second mapping of the grid component for the predetermine geographical area, the additional details being from one or more additional sources and a second database for storing the second data set; a second subsystem including an analytical component running on a processor for analyzing the first mapping of grid components and the second mapping of grid components for the predetermined geographical area to determine a validity of each individual mapping between two or more grid components in the first mapping and storing results of the determined validity in at least one storage component; and an output component with access to the at least one storage component for providing an indicator of the determined validity of each individual mapping between two or more grid components in the first mapping.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the grid components include meters and transformers within the predetermined geographical area.

13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the predetermined geographical area is determined in accordance with a location of at least one substation.

14 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the first data set includes individual mappings between meters, transformers, circuits and phases.

15 . The system of claim 14 , wherein the first data set further includes phase data associated with each individual meter and transformer mapping.

16 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the additional details related to the grid components are selected from the group consisting of: data related to one or more specific meters identified in the first data set; data related to one or more additional meters not identified in the first data set; data related to event details for one or more grid components identified in the first data set.

17 . The system of claim 11 , wherein:
the analytical component of the second subsystem presents an alternative mapping to an individual mapping when a determined validity of the individual mapping is low and assigns a probability threshold to the alternative mapping, the probability threshold being an indicator of the likelihood that the alternative mapping is accurate over the individual mapping; and receives a selected probability threshold, wherein when a probability threshold for an alternative mapping is above the selected probability threshold, the analytical component identifies the individual mapping as a suspected error.

18 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the analytical component applies one or more analytical methods selected from the group consisting of Point of Common Control (PCC) voltage comparison and Kmeans.

19 . The system of claim 18 , wherein the analytical component applies a Multi-Hypothesis Tracking (MHT) process to determine validity of the individual mapping and present alternative mappings.

20 . The system of claim 11 , wherein each individual mapping between two or more grid components includes one of the following mappings: meter-to-transformer; transformer-to-phase; meter-to-phase; meter-to-circuit and transformer-to-circuit.

Assignees

• Leidos Inc

Inventors

• Wepman Joshua Anders
• Michel Jonathan D
• Crowell Timothy Leigh
• Vahlberg Matthew William

Classifications

• G06F16/29

  Geographical information databases · CPC title

• G05F1/66 Primary

  Regulating electric power · CPC title

• G05B15/02

  electric · CPC title

• G06F17/30241

  Physics · mapped topic