Numa i/o aware network queue assignments
US-2016092259-A1 · Mar 31, 2016 · US
US2016234077A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016234077-A1 |
| Application number | US-201514616760-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Feb 9, 2015 |
| Priority date | Feb 9, 2015 |
| Publication date | Aug 11, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method for designing a Network Function Virtualization (NFV) architecture includes accepting a definition of multiple Virtual Network Functions (VNFs), and of one or more packet types having respective occurrence probabilities, wherein each packet type is associated with a respective subset of the VNFs that are to be applied to packets of that packet type. Information on multiple available physical computers, each capable of running only a partial subset of the multiple VNFs, is further accepted. The VNFs are allocated to the physical computers by applying an optimality criterion to definition and the information.
Opening claim text (preview).
1 . A method for designing a Network Function Virtualization (NFV) architecture, the method comprising: accepting a definition of multiple Virtual Network Functions (VNFs), and of one or more packet types having respective occurrence probabilities, wherein each packet type is associated with a respective subset of the VNFs that are to be applied to packets of that packet type; further accepting information on multiple available physical computers, wherein each physical computer is capable of running only a partial subset of the multiple VNFs; and allocating the VNFs to the physical computers by applying an optimality criterion to the definition and the information. 2 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein allocating the VNFs comprises generating a graph in which each vertex represents a respective VNF and each edge indicates that the VNFs represented by the vertices of that edge are allocated jointly to the same physical computer, and processing the graph in accordance with the optimality criterion. 3 . The method according to claim 2 , wherein processing the graph comprises partitioning the graph into subsets, wherein each subset comprises the vertices corresponding to respective VNFs that are allocated jointly to the same respective physical computer. 4 . The method according to claim 3 , wherein partitioning the graph comprises selecting the subsets based on weights assigned to one or more edges of the graph. 5 . The method according to claim 4 , and comprising assigning the weights based on the definition. 6 . The method according to claim 4 , wherein selecting the subsets comprises maximizing a sum of weights of the edges included in the subsets. 7 . The method according to claim 6 , wherein selecting the subsets comprises maximizing the sum of weights in each subset individually. 8 . The method according to claim 3 , wherein partitioning the graph comprises defining at least two subsets that have a different number of vertices. 9 . The method according to claim 3 , wherein partitioning the graph comprises partitioning the graph into a partition that comprises pairwise non-adjacent edges, wherein no two edges in the partition share a common vertex of the graph. 10 . The method according to claim 3 , wherein partitioning the graph comprises selecting each of the subsets iteratively, by excluding the vertices of an already selected subset from the graph before selecting another subset. 11 . The method according to claim 1 , and comprising re-allocating the VNFs to the physical computers in response to a change in the definition or the information. 12 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the optimality criterion aims to minimize a latency of applying the VNFs to the packets by the physical computers. 13 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the optimality criterion aims to set an upper bound on a latency of applying the VNFs to the packets by the physical computers. 14 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the optimality criterion aims to minimize a network bandwidth consumed by applying the VNFs when allocated to the physical computers. 15 . An apparatus for designing a Network Function Virtualization (NFV) architecture, the apparatus comprising: a memory, which is configured to hold a definition of multiple Virtual Network Functions (VNFs), and of one or more packet types having respective occurrence probabilities, wherein each packet type is associated with a respective subset of the VNFs that are to be applied to packets of that packet type, and to further hold information on multiple available physical computers, wherein each physical computer is capable of running only a partial subset of the multiple VNFs; and a processor, which is configured to allocate the VNFs to the physical computers by applying an optimality criterion to the definition and the information. 16 . The apparatus according to claim 15 , wherein the processor is configured allocate the VNFs by generating a graph in which each vertex represents a respective VNF and each edge indicates that the VNFs represented by the vertices of that edge are allocated jointly to the same physical computer, and to process the graph in accordance with the optimality criterion. 17 . The apparatus according to claim 16 , wherein the processor is configured to process the graph by partitioning the graph into subsets, wherein each subset comprises the vertices corresponding to respective VNFs that are allocated jointly to the same respective physical computer. 18 . The apparatus according to claim 17 , wherein the processor is configured to select the subsets based on weights assigned to one or more edges of the graph. 19 . The apparatus according to claim 18 , wherein the processor is configured to assign the weights based on the definition. 20 . The apparatus according to claim 18 , wherein the processor is configured to select the subsets by maximizing a sum of weights of the edges included in the subsets. 21 . The apparatus according to claim 20 , wherein the processor is configured to select the subsets by maximizing the sum of weights in each subset individually. 22 . The apparatus according to claim 17 , wherein the processor is configured to partition the graph by defining at least two subsets that have a different number of vertices. 23 . The apparatus according to claim 17 , wherein the processor is configured to partition the graph into a partition that comprises pairwise non-adjacent edges, wherein no two edges in the partition share a common vertex of the graph. 24 . The apparatus according to claim 17 , wherein the processor is configured to select each of the subsets iteratively, by excluding the vertices of an already selected subset from the graph before selecting another subset. 25 . The apparatus according to claim 15 , wherein the processor is configured to re-allocate the VNFs to the physical computers in response to a change in the definition or the information. 26 . The apparatus according to claim 15 , wherein the optimality criterion aims to minimize a latency of applying the VNFs to the packets by the physical computers. 27 . The apparatus according to claim 15 , wherein the optimality criterion aims to set an upper bound on a latency of applying the VNFs to the packets by the physical computers. 28 . The apparatus according to claim 15 , wherein the optimality criterion aims to minimize a network bandwidth consumed by applying the VNFs when allocated to the physical computers.
Avoiding congestion; Recovering from congestion · CPC title
using virtualisation of network functions or resources, e.g. SDN or NFV entities · CPC title
of virtualised topologies, e.g. software-defined networks [SDN] or network function virtualisation [NFV] · CPC title
Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements · CPC title
Automatic deployment of services triggered by the service manager, e.g. service implementation by automatic configuration of network components · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.