Preoperatively planning an arthroplasty procedure and generating a corresponding patient specific arthroplasty resection guide

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-2016228196-A1
Application number	US-201615134269-A
Country	US
Kind code	A1
Filing date	Apr 20, 2016
Priority date	Dec 18, 2007
Publication date	Aug 11, 2016
Grant date	—

Abstract

Methods of manufacturing a custom arthroplasty resection guide or jig are disclosed herein. For example, one method may include: generating MRI knee coil two dimensional images, wherein the knee coil images include a knee region of a patient; generating MRI body coil two dimensional images, wherein the body coil images include a hip region of the patient, the knee region of the patient and an ankle region of the patient; in the knee coil images, identifying first locations of knee landmarks; in the body coil images, identifying second locations of the knee landmarks; run a transformation with the first and second locations, causing the knee coil images and body coil images to genera correspond with each other with respect to location and orientation.

First claim

We claim:

1 . A method of preoperatively planning an arthroplasty on a joint, the method comprising:
a) receiving first medical images, second medical images and third medical images, wherein the first medical images include a knee region, the second medical images include a hip region, and the third medical images include an ankle region, and wherein the first medical images comprise a resolution that is higher than a resolution of the second medical images and the third medical images; b) generating from the first, second and third medical images a computerized representation of a patient leg, the computerized representation including: 1) a three dimensional computer model of the knee region generated from the first medical images; 2) a hip joint center identified via the second medical images; and 3) an ankle joint center identified via the third medical images; and c) defining in a computerized coordinate system an arthroplasty resection relative to the computerized representation of the patient leg.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing to a computerized cutting machine data pertaining to the defined arthroplasty resection.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the computerized cutting machine includes a CNC machine.

4 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the computerized cutting machine uses the data to cut a resection guide in a jig blank being machined into an arthroplasty jig.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first, second and third medical images are oriented relative to each other in the computerized coordinate system in an arrangement simulating the first, second and third medical images being taken as a single image scan as opposed to three spaced-apart image scans.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first, second and third medical images are the result of respective spaced-apart imaging scans and oriented in the computerized coordinate system as if the first, second and third medical images were generated via a single imaging scan that encompassed the knee, hip and ankle region at the same time.

7 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising receiving fourth medical images that include the knee region and have a resolution that is less than the resolution of the first medical images and wherein the first, second, third and fourth medical images are the result of respective spaced-apart imaging scans and oriented in the computerized coordinate system as if the first, second, third and fourth medical images were generated via a single imaging scan that encompassed the knee, hip and ankle region at the same time.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein, in causing the first, second, third and fourth medical images to be oriented in the computerized coordinate system as if generated via a single imaging scan that encompassed the knee, hip and ankle region at the same time, first locations of landmarks in the first medical images are identified and second locations of the landmarks in the fourth medical images are identified, and the first medical images and second medical images are caused to match each other with respect to location and orientation in the computerized coordinate system.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein causing the first medical images and second medical images to match each other with respect to location and orientation in the computerized coordinate system comprises running a transformation with the first and second locations.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the transformation comprises an Iterative Closest Point algorithm or gradient descent optimization.

11 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the transformation causes the first medical images to reposition in the computer global coordinate system to match the location and orientation of the fourth medical images.

12 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the landmarks in the first medical images are knee landmarks.

13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the knee landmarks comprise at least one of a center of a femur condyle region near a trochlear groove, a point of a medial femur epicondyle, or a most point of a lateral femur epicondyle.

14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the point of the medial femur epicondyle is a most medial point of the medial femur epicondyle.

15 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the point of the lateral femur epicondyle is a most lateral point of the medial femur epicondyle.

16 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the knee landmarks comprise at least one of a medial edge of a medial tibial condyle, a lateral edge of a lateral tibial condyle, a medial transition from a medial tibial plateau to a tibial shaft, or a lateral transition from a lateral tibial plateau to the tibial shaft.

17 . The method of claim 12 , wherein a knee joint center is identified via the fourth medical images and a mechanical axis is defined from the joint centers identified via the second, third and fourth medical images.

18 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising applying a computerized representation of an implant to the three dimensional computer model of the knee region to define the arthroplasty resection.

19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the computerized representation of the implant comprises a computerized three dimensional model of the implant.

20 . The method of claim 19 , wherein the implant comprises at least one of a femoral knee implant or a tibial knee implant.

21 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising conducting a joint analysis wherein the position of the three dimensional computer model of the knee region is manipulated to adjust a joint gap of the three dimensional computer model of the knee region.

22 . The method of claim 21 , wherein the joint gap is adjusted such that a medial joint gap is equal to a lateral joint gap.

23 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a mechanical axis is defined at least in part from at least one of the hip joint center or the ankle joint center.

24 . The method of claim 23 , wherein defining the arthroplasty resection relative to the computerized representation of the patient leg includes determining a desired orientation of the arthroplasty resection relative to the mechanical axis.

25 . The method of claim 24 , wherein the desired orientation is a zero degree mechanical axis orientation.

26 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the medical images are generated via at least one of CT, MRI or other medical imaging methods.

Assignees

• Howmedica Osteonics Corp

Inventors

• Park Ilwhan
• Song keun
• Mishin Oleg
• Santarella Michael

Classifications

• G06F18/22

  Matching criteria, e.g. proximity measures · CPC title

• A61B17/122

  Clamps or clips, e.g. for the umbilical cord {(for the vas deferens A61F6/206)} · CPC title

• G06V10/751

  Comparing pixel values or logical combinations thereof, or feature values having positional relevance, e.g. template matching · CPC title

• A61F2002/4658

  for measuring dimensions, e.g. length · CPC title

• G06T2210/41

  Medical · CPC title