Preoperatively planning an arthroplasty procedure and generating a corresponding patient specific arthroplasty resection guide

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-2016228195-A1
Application number	US-201615134248-A
Country	US
Kind code	A1
Filing date	Apr 20, 2016
Priority date	Dec 18, 2007
Publication date	Aug 11, 2016
Grant date	—

Abstract

Methods of manufacturing a custom arthroplasty resection guide or jig are disclosed herein. For example, one method may include: generating MRI knee coil two dimensional images, wherein the knee coil images include a knee region of a patient; generating MRI body coil two dimensional images, wherein the body coil images include a hip region of the patient, the knee region of the patient and an ankle region of the patient; in the knee coil images, identifying first locations of knee landmarks; in the body coil images, identifying second locations of the knee landmarks; run a transformation with the first and second locations, causing the knee coil images and body coil images to generally correspond with each other with respect to location and orientation.

First claim

We claim:

1 . A method of preoperatively planning a knee arthroplasty, the method comprising:
a) identify first locations of landmarks in first medical images of a first resolution; b) identify second locations of the landmarks in second medical images of a second resolution less than the first resolution; and c) causing the first medical images and second medical images to match each other with respect to location and orientation in a computer global coordinate system.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first medical images and the second medical images are caused to match each other with respect to location and orientation in a computer global coordinate system by running a transformation with the first and second locations.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the transformation comprises an Iterative Closest Point algorithm or gradient descent optimization.

4 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the transformation causes the first medical images to reposition in the computer global coordinate system to match the location and orientation of the second medical images.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising identifying in at least one coronal view of the second medical images a hip center and an ankle center.

6 . The method of claim 5 , further comprising identifying in at least one coronal view of the second medical images a knee center.

7 . The method of claim 5 , further comprising:
generating a computerized three dimensional bone model from data associated with the first medical images; and applying a computerized representation of an implant to the computerized three dimensional bone model to determine an arthroplasty resection.

8 . The method of claim 7 , further comprising conducting a joint analysis wherein the position of the computerized three dimensional bone model in the computer global coordinate system is manipulated to adjust a joint gap of the bone model.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the joint gap is adjusted such that a medial joint gap is equal to a lateral joint gap.

10 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the computerized representation of the implant comprises a computerized three dimensional model of the implant.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the implant comprises at least one of a femoral knee implant or a tibial knee implant.

12 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining in the computer global coordinate system an arthroplasty resection relative to anatomical information resulting from the first medical images subsequent to the first and second medical images being caused to match each other with respect to location and orientation in a computer global coordinate system.

13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein determining in the computer global coordinate system the arthroplasty resection relative to the anatomical information comprises applying a computerized representation of an implant to the anatomical information.

14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the computerized representation comprises a computerized three dimensional model of the implant.

15 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the implant comprises at least one of a femoral knee implant or a tibial knee implant.

16 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the anatomical information comprises a computerized three dimensional bone model generated from the first medical images of the matched first and second medical images.

17 . The method of claim 13 , further comprising sending data to a computer guided cutting machine, the data pertaining to an orientation and location of the arthroplasty resection.

18 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining in the computer global coordinate system an arthroplasty resection relative to anatomical information resulting from the second medical images subsequent to the first and second medical images being caused to match each other with respect to location and orientation in a computer global coordinate system.

19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the anatomical information comprises a mechanical axis defined from the second medical images of the matched first and second medical images.

20 . The method of claim 19 , wherein the mechanical axis is defined at least in part from at least one of a hip center or an ankle center identified in the second medical images.

21 . The method of claim 20 , wherein determining the arthroplasty resection relative to the anatomical information comprises determining a desired orientation of the arthroplasty resection relative to the mechanical axis.

22 . The method of claim 21 , wherein the desired orientation is a zero degree mechanical axis orientation.

23 . The method of claim 21 , further comprising sending data to a computer guided cutting machine, the data pertaining to an orientation and location of the arthroplasty resection.

24 . The method of claim 19 , wherein the mechanical axis is defined from a hip center, knee center, and an ankle center identified in the second medical images.

25 . The method of claim 24 , wherein at least one of a hip, knee or ankle centers is determined from at least one of a sagittal or axial view.

26 . The method of claim 24 , wherein determining the arthroplasty resection relative to the anatomical information comprises determining a desired orientation of the arthroplasty resection relative to the mechanical axis.

27 . The method of claim 26 , wherein the desired orientation is a zero degree mechanical axis orientation.

28 . The method of claim 26 , further comprising sending data to a computer guided cutting machine, the data pertaining to an orientation and location of the arthroplasty resection.

29 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the medical images are generated via at least one of CT, MRI or other medical imaging methods.

30 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first medical images include a region including a knee and the second medical images includes at least one of the knee region, a hip or an ankle.

31 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the landmarks in the first medical images are knee landmarks.

32 . The method of claim 31 , wherein the knee landmarks comprise at least one of a center of a femur condyle region near a trochlear groove, a medial point of a medial femur epicondyle, or a lateral point of a lateral femur epicondyle.

33 . The method of claim 32 , wherein the medial point of the medial femur epicondyle is the most medial point.

34 . The method of claim 32 , wherein the lateral point of the lateral femur epicondyle is the most lateral point.

35 . The method of claim 31 , wherein the knee landmarks comprise at least one of a medial edge of a medial tibial condyle, a lateral edge of a lateral tibial condyle, a medial transition from a medial tibial plateau to a tibial shaft, or a lateral transition from a lateral tibial plateau to the tibial shaft.

36 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining in the computer global coordinate system a hole relative to the anatomical information resulting from the matched first and second medical images.

37 . The method of claim 36 , wherein determining in the computer global coordinate system the hole compris

Assignees

• Howmedica Osteonics Corp

Inventors

• Park Ilwhan
• Song keun
• Mishin Oleg
• Santarella Michael

Classifications

• G06F18/22

  Matching criteria, e.g. proximity measures · CPC title

• A61B17/122

  Clamps or clips, e.g. for the umbilical cord {(for the vas deferens A61F6/206)} · CPC title

• G06V10/751

  Comparing pixel values or logical combinations thereof, or feature values having positional relevance, e.g. template matching · CPC title

• A61F2002/4633

  for selection of endoprosthetic joints or for pre-operative planning · CPC title

• G06T2207/10088

  Magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] · CPC title