Noise, vibration and harshness reduction in a skip fire engine control system

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-2016201586-A1
Application number	US-201614992779-A
Country	US
Kind code	A1
Filing date	Jan 11, 2016
Priority date	Jan 12, 2015
Publication date	Jul 14, 2016
Grant date	—

Abstract

A variety of methods and arrangements for reducing noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) in a skip fire engine control system are described. In one aspect, a firing sequence is used to operate the engine in a skip fire manner. A smoothing torque is determined that is applied to a powertrain by an energy storage/release device. The smoothing torque is arranged to at least partially cancel out variation in torque generated by the skip fire firing sequence. Various methods, powertrain controllers, arrangements and computer software related to the above operations are also described.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1 . A powertrain controller for operating an internal combustion engine in a skip fire manner using an operational firing fraction that is fuel efficient and has acceptable noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) characteristics, the powertrain controller comprising:
a firing fraction calculator arranged to generate an operational firing fraction to deliver a desired engine torque; a firing determination timing module that is arranged to generate a firing sequence used to operate the engine in a skip fire manner, the skip fire firing sequence being based on the operational firing fraction; and an NVH reduction module that is arranged to determine a smoothing torque that is applied to a powertrain by an energy storage/release device wherein the smoothing torque is arranged to at least partially cancel out a variation in torque generated by the skip fire firing sequence, thereby reducing NVH that would otherwise be generated by the skip fire firing sequence.

2 . A powertrain controller as recited in claim 1 wherein:
the firing sequence generates a torque that includes a plurality of harmonic frequencies, one of the harmonic frequencies being a fundamental frequency; and
the smoothing torque is periodic with substantially the same fundamental frequency.

3 . A powertrain controller as recited in claim 1 wherein the smoothing torque includes only a single frequency.

4 . A powertrain controller as recited in claim 1 wherein the NVH reduction module is further arranged to select a magnitude of the smoothing torque based on fuel efficiency and further based on whether the smoothing torque brings NVH generated by the operation of the engine below a predefined NVH target level.

5 . A powertrain controller as recited in claim 1 wherein the energy storage/release device utilizes at least one selected from the group consisting of a capacitor, a battery, a flywheel, a pressurized pneumatic reservoir, and a pressurized hydraulic reservoir.

6 . A powertrain controller as recited in claim 1 wherein the energy storage/release device utilizes at least one selected from the group consisting of an integrated starter, a motor/generator, a controllable mechanical coupling, and a turbine.

7 . A powertrain controller as recited in claim 1 wherein the firing fraction calculator is further arranged to:
obtain a set of available firing fractions that can deliver the desired torque, the set of available firing fractions including a first firing fraction associated with unacceptable NVH levels and a second firing fraction associated with acceptable NVH levels; and
select the first firing fraction as the operational firing fraction.

8 . A powertrain controller as recited in claim 1 wherein the firing fraction calculator and the NVH reduction module are arranged to:
select the operational firing fraction from a set of available firing fractions that includes a first firing fraction that is associated with unacceptable NVH levels and a second firing fraction that is associated with acceptable NVH levels;
determine energy costs associated with mitigating the NVH levels associated with the first firing fraction, the mitigating of the NVH levels involving applying the smoothing torque to the powertrain to help reduce the NVH levels associated with the first firing fraction wherein the selection of the operational firing fraction is based at least in part on the energy costs determination.

9 . A powertrain controller as recited in claim 8 wherein the NVH reduction module is arranged to:
determine energy costs associated with the second firing fraction, which is associated with acceptable NVH;
compare energy costs associated with the first and second firing fractions; and
based on the comparison, select one of the set of available firing fractions as the operational firing fraction.

10 . A powertrain controller as recited in claim 1 wherein the NVH reduction module is further arranged to:
receive sensor data that includes one selected from the group consisting of 1) crankshaft acceleration sensor data; 2) accelerometer data received from one or more accelerometers mounted on a vehicle; and 3) accelerometer data received from one or more accelerometers mounted in an engine control unit (ECU); and
adjust the smoothing torque based on the sensor data.

11 . A powertrain controller as recited in claim 1 wherein the determination of the smoothing torque is performed on a firing opportunity by firing opportunity basis.

12 . A powertrain controller as recited in claim 1 wherein the determination of the smoothing torque is based on adaptive filter feed forward control.

13 . A method for operating an internal combustion engine in a skip fire manner using an operational firing fraction that is fuel efficient and has acceptable noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) characteristics, the method comprising:
generating an operational firing fraction to deliver a desired engine torque; generating a firing sequence used to operate the engine in a skip fire manner, the skip fire firing sequence being based on the operational firing fraction; determining a smoothing torque that is applied to a powertrain by an energy storage/release device wherein the smoothing torque is arranged to at least partially cancel out variation in torque generated by the skip fire firing sequence, thereby reducing NVH that would otherwise be generated by the skip fire firing sequence.

14 . A method as recited in claim 13 , further comprising:
obtaining a set of available firing fractions that can deliver the desired torque; determining a first subset of one or more of the available firing fractions that have acceptable NVH levels; determining a second subset of one or more of the available firing fractions that have unacceptable NVH levels; and determining an energy cost associated with NVH mitigation required to reduce NVH levels for each firing fraction in the second subset to acceptable levels wherein the NVH mitigation involves applying the smoothing torque to the powertrain to reduce vibration generated by the skip fire firing sequence.

15 . A method as recited in claim 14 , further comprising:
determining total energy costs for each of the second subset of firing fractions, wherein the total energy costs include costs associated with both the operational firing fraction and mitigation; determining energy costs for each firing fraction in the first subset of firing fractions; comparing the energy costs of the first and second subsets of firing fractions; and based on the comparison, selecting the operational firing fraction from the first and second subsets of firing fractions.

16 . A method as recited in claim 13 further comprising:
receiving sensor data that includes one selected from the group consisting of 1) crankshaft acceleration sensor data; 2) accelerometer data received from one or more accelerometers mounted on a vehicle; and 3) accelerometer data received from one or more accelerometers mounted in an engine control unit (ECU); and
adjusting the smoothing torque based on the sensor data.

17 . A method as recited in claim 13 wherein the determination of the smoothing torque is performed on a firing opportunity by firing opportunity basis.

18 . A method as recited in claim 13 wherein the determination of the smoothing torque is dependent on the state of the energy storage/release device.

19 . A computer readable storage medium that includes executable computer code embodied in a tangible form and suita

Assignees

• Tula Technology Inc

Inventors

• Serrano Louis J
• Yuan Xin
• Parsels John W
• Pirjaberi Mohammad R
• Wilcutts Mark A
• Nagashima Masaki

Classifications

• F02D41/1498 Primary

  measuring engine roughness · CPC title

• F02D41/307

  to avoid torque shocks · CPC title

• F02D41/3058

  the engine working with a variable number of cycles · CPC title

• F02D41/0087 Primary

  Selective cylinder activation, i.e. partial cylinder operation (deceleration cut-off F02D41/123) · CPC title

• F02D2041/0012

  with selective deactivation of cylinders · CPC title