Evaluating and Servicing Problematic Cash-Handling Machines
US-2016162350-A1 · Jun 9, 2016 · US
US2016196172A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016196172-A1 |
| Application number | US-201615047481-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Feb 18, 2016 |
| Priority date | Oct 10, 2012 |
| Publication date | Jul 7, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method of tracking repeated performance problems in a machine is disclosed. The method comprises storing the faults in a computer memory, and assigning a classification value to the machine based on the frequency and number of the faults. Based on the classification value of the cash handing device it is determined whether the cash handing device needs to be serviced. The faults can be related to one of the hardware, the cash reject rate, image handling, crash rate, user claim rate, and check handling accuracy of the machine.
Opening claim text (preview).
We claim: 1 . A computer-implemented method comprising: determining whether a determined fault exists in a cash-handling machine; when the determined fault occurs, assigning a first chronic value to the cash-handling machine based on a predetermined set of criteria, wherein the determined fault comprises at least two of a hardware fault type, a communication fault type, a cash reject rate fault type, an image handling fault type, a crash rate fault type, a user claim rate fault type, and a check handling accuracy fault type; outputting the first chronic value of the cash-handling machine; and when the cash-handling machine is assigned the first chronic value and the cash-handling machine operates without faults for a first predetermined time period without servicing, re-assigning a second chronic value to the cash-handling machine, wherein the second chronic value corresponds to a less problematic condition than the first chronic value. 2 . The computer implemented method of claim 1 further comprising configuring a plurality of chronic values to range depending on a fault duration. 3 . The computer implemented method of claim 1 wherein the cash-handling machine is considered problematic if it is unavailable for a predetermined amount of time at least once within a predetermined number of days. 4 . The computer implemented method of claim 1 wherein tracking information is used to determine the predetermined set of criteria. 5 . The computer implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: when communication-type faults occur more than a predetermined amount during a predetermined time duration, generating a chronic communications failure ticket. 6 . The computer implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: when the cash-handling machine is assigned the first chronic value and the cash-handling machine remains problematic for a second time period, re-assigning a third chronic value to the cash-handling machine, wherein the third chronic value corresponds to a more problematic condition than the first chronic value. 7 . The computer implemented method of claim 6 , further comprising: when the cash-handling machine is assigned the first chronic value and the cash-handling machine remains problematic for a third time period, re-assigning a fourth chronic value to the cash-handling machine, wherein the third time period is greater than the second time period and wherein the fourth chronic value corresponds to a more problematic condition than the third chronic value. 8 . An apparatus comprising: a processor for executing computer-executable instructions; and one or more memories storing the computer-executable instructions that, when executed, cause the apparatus to perform a method comprising: determining whether a determined fault exists in a cash-handling machine; when the determined fault occurs, assigning a first chronic value to the cash-handling machine based on a predetermined set of criteria, wherein the determined fault comprises at least two of a hardware fault type, a communication fault type, a cash reject rate fault type, an image handling fault type, a crash rate fault type, a user claim rate fault type, and a check handling accuracy fault type; outputting the first chronic value of the cash-handling machine; and when the cash-handling machine is assigned the first chronic value and the cash-handling machine operates without faults for a first predetermined time period without servicing, re-assign a second chronic classification value to the cash-handling machine, wherein the second chronic value corresponds to a less problematic condition than the first chronic value. 9 . The apparatus of claim 8 wherein a plurality of chronic values is configured to range depending on a fault duration. 10 . The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the cash-handling machine is considered problematic if it is unavailable for a predetermined amount of time at least once within a predetermined number of days. 11 . The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the processor is configured to use tracking information to determine the predetermined set of criteria. 12 . The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the computer-executable instructions that, when executed, further cause the apparatus to perform a method comprising: when the cash-handling machine is assigned the first chronic value and the cash-handling machine remains problematic for a second time period, re-assigning a third chronic value to the cash-handling machine, wherein the third chronic value corresponds to a more problematic condition than the first chronic value. 13 . The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the computer-executable instructions that, when executed, further cause the apparatus to perform a method comprising: when the cash-handling machine is assigned the first chronic value and the cash-handling machine remains problematic for a third time period, re-assigning a fourth chronic value to the cash-handling machine, wherein the third time period is greater than the second time period and wherein the fourth chronic value corresponds to a more problematic condition than the third chronic value. 14 . The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the computer-executable instructions that, when executed, further cause the apparatus to perform a method comprising: when communication-type faults occur more than a predetermined amount during a predetermined time duration, generating a chronic communications failure ticket. 15 . A computer program product, comprising a computer usable, non-transitory medium having a computer readable program code embodied therein, said computer readable program code adapted to be executed by a processor to implement a method comprising: determining whether a determined fault exists in a cash-handling machine; when the determined fault occurs, assigning a first chronic value to the cash-handling machine based on a predetermined set of criteria, wherein the determined fault comprises at least two of a hardware fault type, a communication fault type, a cash reject rate fault type, an image handling fault type, a crash rate fault type, a user claim rate fault type, and a check handling accuracy fault type; displaying the classification value of the cash-handling machine; and when the cash-handling machine is assigned the first chronic value and the cash-handling machine operates without faults for a first predetermined time period without servicing, re-assign a second chronic value to the cash-handling machine, wherein the second chronic value corresponds to a less problematic condition than the first chronic value. 16 . The computer program product of claim 15 wherein the cash-handling machine is considered problematic if it is unavailable for a predetermined amount of time at least once within a predetermined number of days. 17 . The computer program product of claim 15 wherein the processor is configured to determine the predetermined set of criteria based on tracking information. 18 . The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the computer readable program code is adapted to be executed by the processor to implement a method comprising: when the cash-handling machine is assigned the first chronic value and the cash-handling machine remains problematic for a second time period, re-assigning a third chronic value to the cash-handling machine, wherein the third chronic value corresponds to a more problematic condition than the first chronic value. 19 . The computer program product of claim 18 , wherein t
by exceeding a count or rate limit, e.g. word- or bit count limit · CPC title
Error or fault detection not based on redundancy (power supply failures G06F1/30; network fault management H04L41/06) · CPC title
in functional embedded systems, i.e. in a data processing system designed as a combination of hardware and software dedicated to performing a certain function (testing or monitoring of automated control systems G05B23/02) · CPC title
Root cause analysis, i.e. error or fault diagnosis (in a hardware test environment G06F11/22; in a software test environment G06F11/36) · CPC title
Storage of error reports, e.g. persistent data storage, storage using memory protection · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.