Computer-aided card design validation

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-2016188783-A1
Application number	US-201514977617-A
Country	US
Kind code	A1
Filing date	Dec 21, 2015
Priority date	Dec 26, 2014
Publication date	Jun 30, 2016
Grant date	—

Abstract

A method for computer-aided validation of a card design is disclosed, the method comprising the steps of detecting a plurality of design elements related to a card design via an image recognition device and encoding the design elements into data elements; comparing the data elements against design requirement encoded as design requirement data; validating the card design by determining if each of the data elements are compliant with the design requirement; wherein the comparison of the data elements and the validation of the card design is performed at a processor; and providing a result of the validation via a user interface.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1 . A method for computer-aided validation of a card design, the method comprising the steps of:
detecting a plurality of design elements related to a card design via an image recognition device and encoding the design elements into data elements; comparing the data elements against design requirement encoded as design requirement data; validating the card design by determining if each of the data elements are compliant with the design requirement; wherein the comparison of the data elements and the validation of the card design is performed at a processor; and providing a result of the validation via a user interface.

2 . The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the result of the validation, provided via the user interface, is an indication of a degree of compliance that the data element has with the design requirement.

3 . The method in accordance with claim 2 , wherein the indication, provided via the user interface, comprises a message providing details of the degree of compliance and acceptability to the design requirement; and/or
wherein the indication, provided via the user interface, comprises a graphical element directing attention to a compliant or non-compliant design element.

4 . The method in accordance with claim 1 , further comprising recognising at least one of the data elements that are proprietary to the card design; and
determining whether the at least one of the data elements are in compliance with the design requirement of the proprietary design element.

5 . The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the design requirement comprises any one or more of the card dimensions including length, width, thickness, and radius of corners of the card;
wherein the design requirement comprises any one or more of text and number requirements including typeface, colour, size, height, contrast, italicisation, spacing, abbreviation, presentation format, and content; wherein the design requirement comprises any one or more of graphical object requirements including orientation, positioning, aspect ratio, dimension, opacity, sharpness, presence, and relative distances; wherein the design requirement comprises any one or more of colour parameter requirements including value, hue, and chroma; and/or wherein the design requirement comprises a layout that is compliant to any one or more standards including International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 7810, ISO/IEC 7811, ISO/IEC 7816, and/or card design guidelines.

6 . The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the step of detecting the plurality of design elements is performed using an automated image recognition technique.

7 . The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the step of validating the card design is performed using a rule based validation technique.

8 . The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the step of validating the card design comprises the step of:
configuring the processor to retrieve the set of design requirement data related to the card design from a database; and comparing the data elements with the retrieved set of design requirement data at the processor.

9 . The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the result, provided via the user interface, comprises a score calculated from the number of data elements that are compliant with the design requirements.

10 . The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the result, provided via the user interface, comprises one or more suggestions to adjust the design elements to comply with the design requirements.

11 . The method in accordance with claim 10 , wherein the adjustment of the design elements is performed automatically.

12 . The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the card design is for a physical or an electronic design.

13 . A computer system for computer-aided validation of a card design, the computer system comprising an image recognition device, a user interface, at least one processor, and at least one memory including computer program code, the at least one memory and the computer program code configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the computer system at least to:
detect a plurality of design elements related to a card design via the image recognition device and encode the design elements into data elements; compare the data elements against design requirement encoded as design requirement data; validate the card design by determining if each of the data elements are compliant with the design requirement; wherein the comparison of the data elements and the validation of the card design is performed at the at least one processor; and provide a result of the validation via the user interface.

14 . The computer system of claim 13 , wherein the result of the validation, provided via the user interface, is an indication of a degree of compliance that a data element has with the design requirement.

15 . The computer system of claim 14 , wherein the indication, provided via the user interface, comprises a message providing details of the degree of compliance and acceptability to the design requirement; and/or
wherein the indication, provided via the user interface, comprises a graphical element directing attention to a compliant or non-compliant design element.

16 . The computer system of claim 13 , wherein the detection of the plurality of design elements is performed using an automated image recognition technique.

17 . The computer system of claim 13 , wherein the validation of the card design is performed using a rule based validation technique.

18 . The computer system of claim 13 , wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the computer system, when validating the card design, at least to:
retrieve the set of design requirement data related to the card design from a database; and compare the data elements with the retrieved set of design requirement data at the at least one processor.

19 . The computer system of claim 13 , wherein the result, provided via the user interface, comprises one or more suggestions to adjust the data elements to comply with the design requirements.

20 . The computer system of claim 19 , wherein the adjustment of the design elements is performed automatically.

21 . A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising computer executable instructions which when executed by a computer cause the computer to perform the method of:
detecting a plurality of design elements related to a card design via an image recognition device and encode the design elements into data elements; comparing the data elements against design requirement encoded as design requirement data; validating the card design by determining if each of the data elements are compliant with the design requirement; wherein the comparison of the data elements and the validation of the card design is performed at a processor; and providing a result of the validation via a user interface.

Assignees

• Mastercard Asia Pacific Pte Ltd

Inventors

• Li Jiaming
• Huang Donghao
• Lee Alvin
• Mccreary Eric
• Low Andy

Classifications

• G06F30/00 Primary

  Computer-aided design [CAD] · CPC title

• G06F30/398 Primary

  Design verification or optimisation, e.g. using design rule check [DRC], layout versus schematics [LVS] or finite element methods [FEM] (optical proximity correction [OPC] design processes G03F1/36) · CPC title

• G06F17/5081 Primary

  Physics · mapped topic