Methods for retargeting circuit design layouts and for fabricating semiconductor devices using retargeted layouts

US2016188781A1 · US · A1

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-2016188781-A1
Application numberUS-201514699705-A
CountryUS
Kind codeA1
Filing dateApr 29, 2015
Priority dateDec 29, 2014
Publication dateJun 30, 2016
Grant date

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Methods for retargeting a circuit design layout for a multiple patterning lithography process and for fabricating a semiconductor device are provided. In an exemplary embodiment, a computer-executed method for retargeting a circuit design layout for a multiple patterning lithography process is provided. The method includes decomposing a circuit design layout file to produce decomposed layout files in a computer. Each decomposed layout file is associated with a respective mask for use in the multiple patterning lithography process. The method includes preparing retargeted layout files in the computer by retargeting selected decomposed layout files based on photolithography limitations specific to each selected decomposed layout file to produce retargeted layout files. Also, the method includes determining in the computer that a combination of layout files includes a spacing conflict. The method further includes resolving the spacing conflict in the computer by modifying the layout file or layout files causing the spacing conflict.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1 . A computer-executed method for retargeting a circuit design layout for a multiple patterning lithography process, the method comprising: decomposing a circuit design layout file to produce decomposed layout files in a computer, wherein each decomposed layout file is associated with a respective mask for use in the multiple patterning lithography process; retargeting selected decomposed layout files based on photolithography limitations specific to each selected decomposed layout file to produce retargeted layout files; determining in the computer that a combination of layout files includes a spacing conflict; and resolving the spacing conflict in the computer by modifying the layout file or layout files causing the spacing conflict. 2 . The computer-executed method of claim 1 wherein: the circuit design layout file includes a pattern of features; each decomposed layout file includes a feature; and retargeting a first selected decomposed layout file comprises adjusting a width of a respective feature in the first selected decomposed layout file to form an adjusted feature. 3 . The computer-executed method of claim 2 wherein: the first selected decomposed layout file includes a terminal feature and a non-terminal feature; and retargeting the first selected decomposed layout file comprises making a greater adjustment to the width of the terminal feature than to the width of the non-terminal feature. 4 . The computer-executed method of claim 2 wherein: the first selected decomposed layout file includes isolated features and non-isolated features; and retargeting the first selected decomposed layout file comprises making a greater adjustment to the widths of the isolated features than to the widths of the non-isolated features. 5 . The computer-executed method of claim 2 wherein determining that the combination of layout files includes a spacing conflict comprises analyzing whether adjacent features in the combination of layout files violate a minimum spacing therebetween. 6 . The computer-executed method of claim 5 wherein resolving the spacing conflict comprises modifying the layout file or layout files causing the spacing conflict using equal violation retract. 7 . The computer-executed method of claim 5 wherein resolving the spacing conflict comprises modifying the layout file or layout files causing the spacing conflict using conflict resolution tables. 8 . A computer-executed method for retargeting a circuit design layout for a multiple patterning lithography process, the method comprising: decomposing a circuit design layout file to produce decomposed layout files in a computer, wherein each decomposed layout file is associated with a respective mask for use in the multiple patterning lithography process, and wherein each decomposed layout file includes at least one feature; creating an estimated layout file in the computer for each decomposed layout file by estimating an adjustment for each feature therein based on a lithography process window of each feature relative to the respective decomposed layout file; and preparing retargeted layout files in the computer by retargeting each decomposed layout file based on the adjustments. 9 . The computer-executed method of claim 8 wherein creating an estimated layout file for each decomposed layout file comprises estimating a width adjustment for a selected feature. 10 . The computer-executed method of claim 8 wherein creating an estimated layout file for each decomposed layout file comprises estimating a location adjustment for a selected feature. 11 . The computer-executed method of claim 8 further comprising: determining in the computer whether a combination of the estimated layout files includes spacing conflicts; and resolving spacing conflicts in the computer by modifying selected adjustments. 12 . The computer-executed method of claim 11 wherein determining whether the combination of the estimated layout files includes spacing conflicts comprises analyzing whether adjacent features in the combination of the estimated layout files violate a minimum spacing therebetween. 13 . The computer-executed method of claim 12 wherein resolving the spacing conflicts comprises modifying the selected adjustments using equal violation retract. 14 . The computer-executed method of claim 12 wherein resolving the spacing conflicts comprises modifying the selected adjustments using conflict resolution tables. 15 . The computer-executed method of claim 8 wherein estimating the adjustment for each feature comprises estimating an adjustment to a width of a respective feature if the respective feature violates a respective photolithography limitation. 16 . The computer-executed method of claim 8 wherein: a selected decomposed layout file includes a terminal feature and a non-terminal feature; and creating the estimated layout file comprises estimating a greater adjustment for terminal feature than for the non-terminal feature. 17 . The computer-executed method of claim 8 wherein: the decomposed layout files include isolated features and non-isolated features; and creating the estimated layout file comprises estimating a greater adjustment for the isolated features than for the non-isolated features. 18 . A method for fabricating a semiconductor device, the method comprising: decomposing a circuit design layout file to produce decomposed layout files; preparing retargeted layout files by retargeting each decomposed layout file based on photolithography limitations specific to each decomposed layout file; determining whether a combination of the retargeted layout files includes spacing conflicts; resolving the spacing conflicts by modifying selected retargeted layout files; fabricating a plurality of masks based on the retargeted layout files; and performing a multiple patterning lithography process with the plurality of masks on a semiconductor substrate. 19 . The method of claim 18 wherein: each decomposed layout file includes at least one feature; and retargeting each decomposed layout file comprises adjusting a width or location of a selected feature in each decomposed layout file. 20 . The method of claim 18 wherein: each decomposed layout file includes at least one feature; and determining whether the combination of the retargeted layout files includes spacing conflicts comprises analyzing whether adjacent features in the combination of the retargeted layout files violate a minimum spacing therebetween.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Masks having proximity correction features; Preparation thereof, e.g. optical proximity correction [OPC] design processes · CPC title

  • G06F30/398Primary

    Design verification or optimisation, e.g. using design rule check [DRC], layout versus schematics [LVS] or finite element methods [FEM] (optical proximity correction [OPC] design processes G03F1/36) · CPC title

  • G03F1/70Primary

    Adapting basic layout or design of masks to lithographic process requirements, e.g., second iteration correction of mask patterns for imaging · CPC title

  • Manufacturability analysis or optimisation for manufacturability · CPC title

  • Physics · mapped topic

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US2016188781A1 cover?
Methods for retargeting a circuit design layout for a multiple patterning lithography process and for fabricating a semiconductor device are provided. In an exemplary embodiment, a computer-executed method for retargeting a circuit design layout for a multiple patterning lithography process is provided. The method includes decomposing a circuit design layout file to produce decomposed layout fi…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Globalfoundries Inc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06F30/398. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Thu Jun 30 2016 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (A1). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).