Method and appapatus for normalizing size of cotent in multi-projection theater and computer-readable recording medium
US-2016134862-A1 · May 12, 2016 · US
US2016178361A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016178361-A1 |
| Application number | US-201514961353-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Dec 7, 2015 |
| Priority date | Dec 19, 2014 |
| Publication date | Jun 23, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The present invention relates to a method of determining content screening suitabilities in a multi-projection theater including a plurality of projection planes. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method of determining content screening suitabilities based on a series of operation equations using content attribute values, such as the horizontal length and vertical length of an output screen when content is played back, and theater attribute values, such as the length and height of the surface of a front or side wall within a theater building. The method may include calculating at least one of a screen attribute value and a theater attribute value, calculating a suitability based on the screen attribute value or the theater attribute value, and determining whether the calculated suitability falls within a predetermined range.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A method for determining content screening suitabilities in a multi-projection theater, the method comprising: calculating at least one of a screen attribute value and a theater attribute value; calculating a suitability based on the screen attribute value or the theater attribute value; and determining whether the calculated suitability falls within a predetermined range. 2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein: calculating at least one of the screen attribute value and the theater attribute value comprises calculating a plurality of the screen attribute values and a plurality of the theater attribute values, calculating the suitability comprises calculating one or suitabilities based on the plurality of screen attribute values and the plurality of theater attribute values, and determining whether the calculated suitability falls within the predetermined range comprises determining whether content is suitable for being screened according to each of the suitabilities by determining whether each of the suitabilities falls within a predetermined range. 3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining whether the calculated suitability falls within the predetermined range comprises assigning a class corresponding to a predetermined range to a suitability if, as a result of the determination, each of the suitabilities is determined to fall within any one of a plurality of the predetermined ranges. 4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein: the screen attribute value comprises a width of a content output screen, the theater attribute value comprises a width of a projection surface within the theater, and the suitability comprises an effective area ratio calculated by Equation 1. Screen width value Projection surface width value = Effective area ratio ( 1 ) 5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the content screening suitability is determined to be satisfied if the effective area ratio is 0.7 or more to 1.0 or less. 6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein: the screen attribute value comprises a front traverse length and side traverse length of a content output screen, and the suitability comprises a front side ratio (FSR) calculated by Equation 2. Side traverse length Front traverse length = FSR ( 2 ) 7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the content screening suitability is determined to be satisfied if the FSR is 1.75 or more to 2.25 or less. 8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein: the screen attribute value comprises a traverse length of a content output screen, the theater attribute value comprises a traverse length of a projection plane within the theater, and the suitability comprises a front offset ratio (FOR) calculated by Equation 3. Traverse length of projection plane Traverse length of screen = FOR ( 3 ) 9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the content screening suitability is determined to be satisfied if the front offset ratio is 1.0 or more to 1.2 or less. 10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein: the theater attribute value comprises a left bezel and a right bezel, and the suitability
Equipment specially adapted for cinemas (cinematographic projection means G03B) · CPC title
Multi-projection systems (video walls G06F3/1446) · CPC title
with cameras or projectors providing touching or overlapping fields of view · CPC title
Processing of content or additional data; Elementary server operations; Server middleware · CPC title
Reflectors in projection beam {(in illumination beam G03B21/2066)} · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.