Quantitative comparative analysis method for molecular orbital distributions according to state of charge, and system using same
US-2016378955-A1 · Dec 29, 2016 · US
US2016171182A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016171182-A1 |
| Application number | US-201414904651-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Jul 15, 2014 |
| Priority date | Jul 15, 2013 |
| Publication date | Jun 16, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The present invention relates to a molecular orbital similarity deviation evaluation method comprising: a) a step for selecting two subject molecular orbitals, the molecular orbital similarity of which is to be compared, then obtaining N x multi-block spectrums (MBS) having different block sizes, and subsequently combining N x MBS pairs having the same block size; b) a step for calculating a TSS(m) score for each MBS pair (m being the number of the MBS and being from 1 to N x ) by carrying out a multi-step uniformity evaluation on the N x MBS pairs; and c) a step for calculating the standard deviation of the TSS(m) scores for the N x MBS pairs and using same to quantitatively evaluate the molecular orbital similarity deviation.
Opening claim text (preview).
1 . A method for evaluating similarity deviation between molecular orbitals, comprising: a) selecting two molecular orbitals to be compared for molecular orbital similarity, and obtaining N x MBS pairs by i) computing molecular orbital distributions by a quantum chemistry calculation, ii) building N blocks arranged in a radial direction from the center of the molecular structure, iii) calculating a molecular orbital ratio (BX(k)) associated with each of the blocks (k is a natural number and represents a block number ranging from 1 to N), iv) rearranging the blocks consecutively by orbital ratio (BX(k)) size, v) with the exception that blocks are built at different sizes, repeating steps ii) to iv) for the individual molecular orbitals of interest to give N x MBS (multi-block spectra) per molecular orbital, the MBS being different in block size, and assembling N x MBS pairs by block size; b) performing multi-step identity estimation on the N x MBS pairs to calculate TSS(m) for each of the MBS pairs (m is an MBS number ranging from 1 to N x ); and c) calculating a standard deviation of TSS (m) for each of the MBS pairs, and evaluating similarity deviation between molecular orbitals on the basis of the calculated deviations. 2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the quantum chemistry calculation of step i) is conducted through distribution of the electron density function (ψ2), which is a square of the orbital wave function (ψ), in each point determined with regard to a molecular structure. 3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the quantum chemistry calculation of step i) is conducted through single-point energy calculation or geometry optimization calculation. 4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the orbital ratio (BX(k)) associated with each of the blocks in step iii) is obtained by calculating individual molecular orbitals BMO(k)) associated with individual blocks, calculating a total sum of the entire molecular orbital from the individual molecular orbitals, and dividing the individual molecular orbitals BMO(k)) associated with each of the blocks by a total sum of the entre molecular orbital. 5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the quantum chemistry calculation of step a) uses an RDM calculation method. 6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the multi-step identity estimation is carried out in a total of three steps for estimating the N x MBS pairs for similarity. 7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein a first identity estimation of the three steps is carried out in such a manner that when the block spectrum sequences of each of the N x MBS pairs are compared at the same sequence positions, SC (m, n) is assigned to the same blocks, with lower SC (m, n) values at higher n (m is an MBS number ranging from 1 to N x ). 8 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the first identity estimation is carried out in such a manner that when m is 1, SC(m, n)=X is assigned to the same blocks at n=1, SC(m, n)=Y is assigned to the same blocks at l=2, and SC(m, n)=Z is assigned to the same blocks at l>2, and X is between 0 (zero) and 0.6 (exclusive of zero, inclusive of 0.6), Y is between 0 and 0.5 (exclusive of 0, inclusive of 0.5), and Z ranges from 0 to 0.3, with the proviso of X+Y+(N−2)×Z=1.0. 9 . The method of claim 6 , wherein a second-step identity estimation of the three steps comprises: i) assigning an SC(m, n) value if the following condition is met : of the block spectra for each of the N x MBS pairs, a block at n=1 in a first block spectrum is identical to that at n=2 in a second block spectrum, and a block at n=2 in the first block spectrum is identical to that at n=1 in the second block spectrum, and ii) assigning an SC(m,n) value if the following condition is met: a block at n=2 in the first block spectrum is identical to that at n=3 in the second block spectrum and a block at n=3 in the first block spectrum is identical to that at n=2 in the second block spectrum, the SC(m, n) values assigned in step i) being greater than that assigned in step ii). 10 . The method of claim 6 , wherein a third-step identity estimation of the three steps is carried out in such a manner that a criterion for a block sequence distance (d_BL{m,n}) at the same sequence position for each of the MBS pairs is established, and if a block sequence distance at each position is identical to the block sequence distance (d_BL{l}) criterion, an SC(m, n) value is assigned, with the proviso that the SC(m, n) value decreases with an increase in n. 11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the TSS(m) of step b) is calculated according to the following Mathematical Formula 1: TSS { m } = ( ∑ n = 1 N { m } SC { m , n } ) × 100 ( % ) [ Math Formula 1 ] wherein m is an MBS number ranging from 1 to N x. 12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the similarity deviation between molecular orbitals in step c) is determined in such a manner that when the standard deviation is 0, there is no similarity deviation between molecular orbitals, and that a larger standard deviation means a larger similarity deviation between molecular orbitals. 13 . A system for evaluating similarity deviation between molecular orbitals, comprising: a) a blocking module for selecting two molecular orbitals to be compared for molecular orbital similarity, and obtaining N x MBS pairs by i) computing molecular orbital distributions by a quantum chemistry calculation, ii) building N blocks
Physics · mapped topic
Computational theoretical chemistry, i.e. ICT specially adapted for theoretical aspects of quantum chemistry, molecular mechanics, molecular dynamics or the like · CPC title
Other general methods · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.