Session slicing of mirrored packets
US-12184680-B2 · Dec 31, 2024 · US
US2016164889A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016164889-A1 |
| Application number | US-201414559255-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Dec 3, 2014 |
| Priority date | Dec 3, 2014 |
| Publication date | Jun 9, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Methods and systems for detecting on-wire unauthorized/rogue access points (APs) within a network are provided. According to one embodiment, a potential rogue AP is detected by a managed access point (AP) within a network. The managed AP causes a network element on a wired side of the network to inject a special network packet having a defined pattern onto the network. When the managed AP detects the special network packet has been transmitted by the potential rogue AP, then the potential rogue AP is identified by the managed AP as a confirmed on-wire rogue AP.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A method comprising: 2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the network element comprises one or a combination of a network controller, a gateway, a router, a firewall, a hub and a switch. 3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said detecting a potential rogue AP in the network comprises scanning, by the managed AP, the network for an AP that is not among those on a list of valid APs. 4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the list of valid APs includes Media Access Control (MAC) addresses of the valid APs. 5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising injecting, by the network element, the special network packet through a wired interface within one or more communication sessions associated with the potential rogue AP. 6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the one or more communication sessions comprise a transmission control protocol (TCP) session and wherein the special network packet comprises a TCP packet. 7 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the one or more communication sessions comprise a user datagram protocol (UDP) session and wherein the special network packet comprises a UDP packet. 8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the defined pattern comprises a length of the special network packet. 9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the potential rogue AP comprises a layer 3 AP. 10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said detecting whether the special network packet is transmitted by the potential rogue AP comprises receiving, by the managed AP, the special network packet on a wireless interface of the managed AP. 11 . A system for detecting a rogue access point (AP) comprising: a potential rogue AP identification module, operable within a managed AP of a network, configured to detect a potential rogue AP in the network; a special packet injection module, operable within a network element on a wired side of the network, configured to inject a special network packet having a defined pattern onto the network; a rogue AP evaluation module, operable within the managed AP, configured to detect whether the special network packet is transmitted by the potential rogue AP; and wherein responsive to receiving an indication from the rogue AP evaluation module that the special network packet has been detected by the rogue AP evaluation module, the managed AP identifies the potential rogue AP as a confirmed on-wire rogue AP. 12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the network element comprises one or a combination of a network controller, a gateway, a router, a firewall, a hub and a switch. 13 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the potential rogue AP is detected by the managed AP by scanning the network for an AP that is not among those on a list of valid APs. 14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the list of valid APs includes Media Access Control (MAC) addresses of the valid APs. 15 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the network element injects the special network packet through a wired interface within one or more communication sessions associated with the potential rogue AP. 16 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the one or more communication sessions comprise a transmission control protocol (TCP) session and wherein the special network packet comprises a TCP packet. 17 . The system of claim 15 , wherein said one or more communication sessions comprise a user datagram protocol (UDP) session and wherein the special network packet comprises a UDP packet. 18 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the defined pattern comprises a length of the special network packet. 19 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the potential rogue AP comprises a layer 3 AP. 20 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the rogue AP evaluation module detects the special network packet when the managed AP receives the special network packet on a wireless interface of the managed AP.
Event detection, e.g. attack signature detection · CPC title
at the network layer · CPC title
Counter-measures against attacks; Protection against rogue devices · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.