Identifying prompts used for training of inference models
US-2024273300-A1 · Aug 15, 2024 · US
US2016154782A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016154782-A1 |
| Application number | US-201514951546-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Nov 25, 2015 |
| Priority date | Oct 31, 2013 |
| Publication date | Jun 2, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The disclosed solution uses machine learning-based methods to improve the knowledge extraction process in a specific domain or business environment. By formulizing a specific company's internal knowledge and terminology, the ontology programming accounts for linguistic meaning to surface relevant and important content for analysis. Based on the self-training mechanism developed by the inventors, the ontology programming automatically trains itself to understand the business environment by processing and analyzing a defined corpus of communication data. For example, the disclosed ontology programming adapts to the language used in a specific domain, including linguistic patterns and properties, such as word order, relationships between terms, and syntactical variations. The disclosed system and method further relates to leveraging the ontology to assess a dataset and conduct a funnel analysis to identify patterns, or sequences of events, in the dataset.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . A method of automated discourse analysis of interaction transcriptions, the method comprising; receiving, by at least one processor, a plurality of interaction transcriptions; for each respective interaction transcript of the plurality of interaction transcriptions: identifying, by the at least one processor, a plurality of meaning units within the respective interaction transcription; classifying, by the at least one processor, the plurality of meaning units into dialog acts, the dialog acts include at least the following categories: social, information, request, response and repetition, the repetition category being used to identify a repetition of a immediately previous dialog act when one party to a given interaction repeats a meaning unit previously spoken by another party to the given interaction; and identifying, by the at least one processor, durations between the dialog acts; selecting, by the at least one processor, a subset of the plurality of interaction transcriptions based on the durations; extracting, by the at least one processor, syntactic patterns from the selected subset; and outing, by the at least one processor, the extracted patterns as a visual presentation on a graphical display. 2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising selecting, by the at least one processor, the subset with long call duration. 3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising selecting, by the at least one processor, the subset with the longest identified durations between dialog acts. 4 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the extracted patterns include an identification of the agent or group of customer service agents represented in the selected subset with long call duration. 5 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the extracted patterns include an identification of a reason for call length of the selected subset with long call duration and an indication of which particular topics, events or dialog acts are most likely to result in abnormally long calls. 6 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the extracted patterns include an identification of the agent or group of customer service agents represented in the selected subset with the longest identified durations between dialog acts. 7 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the extracted patterns include an identification of a reason for call length of the selected subset with the longest identified durations between dialog acts and an identification of which dialog acts are most likely to result in abnormally long calls. 8 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising selecting, by the at least one processor, the subset that resulted in a sales outcome. 9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the extracted patterns include an identification of how a call results in an upsell start. 10 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising selecting, by the at least one processor, the subset that resulted in a cancelation outcome. 11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the extracted patterns include an identification of what is the call flow of a call that results in a cancelation. 12 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising selecting, by the at least one processor, the subset by processing the plurality of interaction transcriptions to identify a triggering theme and then creating the subset around the identified triggering theme. 13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the subset is created as a particular number of words before and after the trigger theme appearance. 14 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the subset is created as a particular number of back and forth interactions between an agent and a customer. 15 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions that when executed by a hardware processor, cause the processor to perform a method comprising; receiving a plurality of interaction transcriptions; for each respective interaction transcript of the plurality of interaction transcriptions: identifying a plurality of meaning units within the respective interaction transcription; classifying the plurality of meaning units into dialog acts, the dialog acts include at least the following categories: social, information, request, response and repetition, the repetition category being used to identify a repetition of a immediately previous dialog act when one party to a given interaction repeats a meaning unit previously spoken by another party to the given interaction; and identifying durations between the dialog acts; selecting a subset of the plurality of interaction transcriptions based on the durations; extracting syntactic patterns from the selected subset; and outing the extracted patterns as a visual presentation on a graphical display. 16 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the method further comprises selecting the subset with long call duration. 17 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the method further comprises selecting the subset with the longest identified durations between dialog acts. 18 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the method further comprises selecting the subset that resulted in a sales outcome. 19 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the method further comprises selecting the subset that resulted in a cancelation outcome. 20 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the method further comprises selecting the subset by processing the plurality of interaction transcriptions to identify a triggering theme and then creating the subset around the identified triggering theme.
Call context notifications · CPC title
Conversation recording systems (at the subscriber's set H04M1/656) · CPC title
Call or contact centers supervision arrangements · CPC title
Call detail recording · CPC title
Syntactic parsing, e.g. based on context-free grammar [CFG] or unification grammars · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.