A device for applying vibrations to a passenger car
US-2024402051-A1 · Dec 5, 2024 · US
US2016154407A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016154407-A1 |
| Application number | US-201514883279-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Oct 14, 2015 |
| Priority date | Oct 15, 2014 |
| Publication date | Jun 2, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A system and method for testing a test vehicle or a system on the test vehicle for warning the presence of an object proximate the test vehicle or a system to avoid a collision includes a self-powered, independently movable target configured to be positioned proximate the test vehicle, the target comprising a support frame having wheels, a motor operably coupled to one or more wheels, brakes operably coupled to each wheel and a control system coupled to the motor, brakes and wheels and configured to control acceleration, braking and steering of the wheels, and a collision avoidance system operable with the control system and configured to control the target to avoid a collision with the test vehicle.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1 . An arrangement for testing a test vehicle or a system on the test vehicle for warning the presence of an object proximate the test vehicle or a system to avoid a collision, comprising: a self-powered, independently movable target configured to be positioned proximate the test vehicle, the target comprising a support frame with wheels, a motor operably coupled to at least one wheel, brakes operably coupled to each wheel and a control system coupled to the motor, brakes and wheels and configured to control acceleration, braking and steering of the wheels, and a collision avoidance system operable with the control system and configured to control the target to avoid a collision with the test vehicle. 2 . The arrangement of claim 1 and further comprising a fan configured to create a vacuum under the target. 3 . The arrangement of claim 2 and further comprising cavity formed in a panel under the target and fluidly coupled to the fan. 4 . The arrangement of claim 1 and further comprising a first wireless communication device apart from any system under test and configured to be mounted on the test vehicle, and wherein the target includes a second wireless communication device in communication with the first wireless communication device and operably coupled to the collision avoidance system, the collision avoidance system configured to control the target based on information received from the second wireless device. 5 . The arrangement of claim 1 wherein the control system is configured to selectively provide more torque to one wheel over another wheel. 6 . The arrangement of claim 1 wherein the target comprises a vehicle. 7 . The arrangement of claim 6 wherein the target includes driver operated controls to steer, brake and/or control the motor of the target. 8 . The arrangement of claim 1 wherein the target comprises represents a non-motorized vehicle. 9 . The arrangement of claim 1 and a plurality of self-powered, independently movable targets configured to be positioned proximate the test vehicle, each target comprising a support frame having wheels, a motor operably coupled to the wheels, brakes operably coupled to each wheel and a control system coupled to the motor, brakes and wheels and configured to control acceleration, braking and steering of the wheels, and a collision avoidance system operable with the control system and configured to control the target to avoid a collision with the test vehicle. 10 . The arrangement of claim 1 wherein the target has one of longitudinal acceleration or lateral acceleration substantially better than the test vehicle. 11 . The arrangement of claim 10 wherein longitudinal acceleration is at least 25% better than the test vehicle. 12 . The arrangement of claim 10 wherein longitudinal acceleration is at least 50% better than the test vehicle. 13 . The arrangement of claim 10 wherein longitudinal acceleration is at least 75% better than the test vehicle. 14 . The arrangement of claim 10 wherein lateral acceleration is at least 50% better than the test vehicle. 15 . The arrangement of claim 10 wherein lateral acceleration is at least 100% better than the test vehicle. 16 . The arrangement of claim 10 wherein lateral acceleration is at least 150% better than the test vehicle. 17 . A method for testing a test vehicle or a system on the test vehicle for warning the presence of an object proximate the test vehicle or a system to avoid a collision, comprising: maneuvering a test vehicle in a test situation proximate a target, the target one or more performance characteristics substantially better than that of the test vehicle; monitoring for a likelihood of a collision between the test vehicle and the target; and maneuvering the target to avoid the collision in the event the likelihood of a collision. 18 . The method of comprising a plurality of targets, each target being maneuvered during the test, each target having one or more performance characteristics substantially better than that of the test vehicle. 19 . The method of claim 17 wherein the target has one of longitudinal acceleration or lateral acceleration substantially better than the test vehicle. 20 . The method of claim 17 wherein longitudinal acceleration is at least 25% better than the test vehicle. 21 . The method of claim 17 wherein longitudinal acceleration is at least 50% better than the test vehicle. 22 . The method of claim 17 wherein longitudinal acceleration is at least 75% better than the test vehicle. 23 . The method of claim 17 wherein lateral acceleration is at least 50% better than the test vehicle. 24 . The method of claim 17 wherein lateral acceleration is at least 100% better than the test vehicle. 25 . The method of claim 17 wherein lateral acceleration is at least 150% better than the test vehicle. 26 . The method of claim 17 wherein the target comprises a ground effect system. 27 . A wheeled apparatus comprising: a support frame with wheels; a motor operably coupled to one or more wheels; brakes operably coupled to each wheel; a control system coupled to the motor, brakes and the wheels and configured to autonomously control acceleration, braking and steering of the wheels; a collision avoidance system operable with the control system and configured to avoid a collision with a test vehicle; and a ground effect system configured to create a vacuum between a downwardly facing panel on the carriage and a surface upon which the apparatus travels upon. 28 . The wheeled apparatus of claim 27 wherein the ground effect system includes a fan. 29 . The wheeled apparatus of claim 28 wherein the ground effect system includes a cavity fluidly coupled to the fan. 30 . The wheeled apparatus of claim 27 wherein the motor comprises an electric motor. 31 . The wheeled apparatus of claim 27 wherein the motor comprises an internal combustion engine.
for active traffic, e.g. moving vehicles, pedestrians, bikes · CPC title
Shock-testing of vehicles · CPC title
Details, e.g. roller construction, vehicle restraining devices · CPC title
for avoiding collisions between vehicles · CPC title
Control of position or course in two dimensions [2D] · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.