System and method of anomaly detection
US-8941484-B2 · Jan 27, 2015 · US
US2016149944A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016149944-A1 |
| Application number | US-201514945692-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Nov 19, 2015 |
| Priority date | Nov 21, 2014 |
| Publication date | May 26, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method and system for automatic signalling an alert when a possible intrusion occurs in an industrial automation and control system, based on security events which occur in the industrial automation and control system or are externally fed into the system. The method includes the steps of: (a) determining a correlation of a first and second security event and storing the correlation in an event database, wherein the correlation includes a probability that the first security event is followed by the second security event within a normalised time period, (b) identifying a candidate event as the first security event, based on event information of the candidate event, upon occurrence of the candidate event, (c) classifying the candidate event as anomalous when the probability exceeds a predetermined threshold and no second security event follows the candidate event within the normalised time period, and (d) signalling the alert indicating the candidate event.
Opening claim text (preview).
1 . A method for automatic signalling an alert when a possible intrusion occurs in an industrial automation and control system, comprising: (a) determining a correlation of a first E 1 and second security event E 2 and storing the correlation in an event database, wherein the correlation includes a probability P E1,E2 that the first security event is directly followed by the second security event within a normalised time period, (b) identifying a candidate event as the first security event, based on event information of the candidate event, upon occurrence of the candidate event, (c) classifying the candidate event as anomalous when the probability P E1,E2 exceeds a predetermined threshold and no second security event follows the candidate event within the normalised time period, and (d) signalling the alert indicating the candidate event. 2 . The method according to claim 1 , further comprising: accumulating the correlation of the first and second security event upon their re-occurrence, and updating the event database. 3 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the predetermined threshold P thres is 0.8, preferably 0.9. 4 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the probability P E1,E2 is a distributed probability. 5 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the probability P E1,E2 increases with elapsed time since the occurrence of the first security event. 6 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the event information comprises a provider identification and an event identification. 7 . A system for automatic signalling when a possible intrusion occurs in an industrial automation and control system, adapted to (a) determine a correlation of a first E 1 and second security event E 2 and store the correlation in an event database, wherein the correlation includes a probability P E1,E2 that the first security event is followed by the second security event within a normalised time period, (b) identify a candidate event as the first security event, based on event information of the candidate event, upon occurrence of the candidate event, (c) classify the candidate event as anomalous when the probability P E1,E2 exceeds a predetermined threshold and no second security event follows the candidate event within the normalised time period, and (d) signal the alert indicating the candidate event. 8 . The system according to claim 7 , further adapted to accumulate the correlation of the first and second security even upon their re-occurrence, and updating the event database. 9 . The system according to claim 7 , wherein the predetermined threshold P thres is 0.8, preferably 0.9. 10 . The system according to claim 7 , wherein the probability P E1,E2 is a distributed probability. 11 . The system according to claim 7 , wherein the probability P E1,E1 increases with elapsed time since the occurrence of the first security event. 12 . The system according to claim 7 , wherein the event information comprises a provider identification and an event identification.
involving event detection and direct action · CPC title
involving simulating, designing, planning or modelling of a network · CPC title
Safe mode, secure program, environment in case of error, intrusion · CPC title
Updating · CPC title
Event management; Broadcasting; Multicasting; Notifications · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.