Using Content Structure to Socially Connect Users
US-2015339270-A1 · Nov 26, 2015 · US
US2016132591A1 · US · A1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-2016132591-A1 |
| Application number | US-201414537182-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | A1 |
| Filing date | Nov 10, 2014 |
| Priority date | Nov 10, 2014 |
| Publication date | May 12, 2016 |
| Grant date | — |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A computer-implemented method for cognitive matching of narrative data may include collecting a set of data for a party and determining, by analyzing the set of data, an identifiable event for the party. In addition, the method may include identifying, using the identifiable event, a relevant feature of a corpus and providing an output corresponding to the relevant feature.
Opening claim text (preview).
1 . A computer implemented method for cognitive matching of narrative data, the method comprising: collecting a set of data for a party; determining, by analyzing the set of data, an identifiable event for the party; identifying, using the identifiable event, a relevant feature of a corpus; and providing an output corresponding to the relevant feature. 2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein collecting the set of data for the user includes aggregating user generated data selected from a group consisting of: a web page, a user profile, a user status, a comment, or a blog. 3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the corpus includes a narrative content database having one or more types of narrative content selected from a group consisting of: literature data, film data, television data, audio data, and electronic game data. 4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the narrative content is structured in a set of ontological relationships. 5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining, by analyzing the set of data, the identifiable event for the party includes: extracting metadata from the set of data; determining, based on the metadata of the set of data, a prominence factor of the set of data; and ascertaining that the prominence factor of the set of data achieves a prominence criterion. 6 . The method of claim 5 , further comprising: parsing, by a natural language processing technique configured to analyze semantic and syntactic content, unstructured data of the set of data; identifying, from the unstructured data of the set of data, a set of story elements; extracting, using the natural language processing technique, a sentiment feature coupled with the set of story elements; and establishing, using the set of story elements and the sentiment feature, a framework component. 7 . The method of claim 1 , identifying, using the identifiable event, the relevant feature of the corpus includes: comparing a framework component to narrative content of a narrative content database; and determining, based on a set of story elements and a sentiment feature of the framework component and a set of ontological relationships of the narrative content, the relevant feature corresponding to the identifiable event. 8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein providing the output corresponding to the relevant feature includes: generating, based on the relevant feature, a set of content suggestions; and transmitting, to a user, the set of content suggestions. 9 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising assigning, to the set of content suggestions, a confidence score based on a relationship between the framework component and the relevant feature. 10 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving a set of user ratings for the output; and defining, using a machine learning technique configured to process the set of user ratings for the output, a decision parameter for identifying the relevant feature of the corpus. 11 - 20 . (canceled)
Filtering based on additional data, e.g. user or group profiles (filtering in web context G06F16/9535, G06F16/9536) · CPC title
Semantic analysis · CPC title
Parsing · CPC title
Machine learning · CPC title
using natural language analysis · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.